Zusammenfassung
Skalen zur Schweregradbeurteilung dienen in klinischen Studien (1) zur Feststellung des Vorhandenseins minimal notwendiger Symptome als Aufnahmekriterium für eine Therapiestudie, (2) zur Abbildung des Beschwerdeverlaufs, (3) zur Beurteilung der Wirksamkeit einer Behandlung (Bech et al. 1986; Maier et al. 1988b).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Andreasen NC, McDonald-Scott P, Grove WM, Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Hirschfeld RM A (1982) Assessment of reliability in multicenter collaborative research with a videotype approach. Am J Psychiatry 139 (7): 876–882
Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT (1976) On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 163: 307–317
Bech P, Haaber A, Joyce CRB (1986) Experiments on clinical observation and judgement in the assessment of depression: profiled videotapes and judgement analysis. Psychol Med 16: 873–883
Cicchetti DV, Prusoff BA (1983) Reliability of depression and associated clinical symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40: 987–990
Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1976) The global assessment scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33: 766–771
Fleiss JL (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore
Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23: 56–62
Hamilton M (1969) Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Br J Psychiatry Special Publication 3: 76–79
Hebenstreit M (1990) Reliabilitätsprobleme bei der Anwendung von Schweregradskalen in multizentrischen Studien. (In Vorbereitung)
Lipman RS (1982) Differentiating anxiety and depression in anxiety disorders: use of rating scales. Psychopharmacol Bull 18: 69–82
Maier W, Buller R, Philipp M, Heuser I (1988a) The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord 14: 61–68
Maier W, Philipp M, Heuser I, Schlegel S, Buller R, Wetzel H (1988b) Improving depression severity assessment. I. Reliability, internal validity and sensitivity to change of three observer depression scales. J Psychiatry Res 22: 3–12
Raskin A, Schulterbrandt J, Reatig N et al. (1969) Replication of factors of psychopathology in interview, ward behavior and self-report ratings of hospitalized depressives. J Nerv Ment Dis 148: 87–98
Sheehan DV (1984) The relative efficacy of phenelzine, imipramine, alprazolam and placebo in the treatment of panic disorder. Vortrag anläßlich des „Annual Meeting” of the American Psychiatric Association, Los Angeles, Mai 5–11
Williams JBW (1988) A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45: 742–747
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hebenstreit, M., Buller, R. (1993). Der Einsatz von Videointerviews zur Optimierung der Reliabilität von Schweregradbeurteilungen für Angst, Depression und globale Beeinträchtigung. In: Ronge, J., Kügelgen, B. (eds) Perspektiven des Videos in der klinischen Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77188-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77188-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54981-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77188-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive