Topographical Variation of Equivalent EEG Generators During Cognitive Decline in Patients with Dementia of Alzheimer Type

  • T. Dierks
  • K. Maurer
  • L. Frölich
  • R. Ihl
Conference paper


Since Berger described the human EEG in 1929 (Berger 1929) clinicians as well as researchers have attempted to conceptualize electrical activity of the brain as a reflection of mental processes. Due to recent advances in computer software and hardware it is now possible to sample more electrical information from the brain and make the concept of the EEG as an electrical brain mirror tangible. However, the increasing amount of data make a sensible interpretation of the data difficult. One way to reduce data in a reasonable way is to calculate equivalent dipoles, which describe the electrical activity of the brain as one or more dipoles generating the electrical field over the surface of the scalp. The calculation of dipoles have mostly been accomplished in the time domain, for example, epileptic discharges or evoked potentials. For the investigation of psychiatric diseases, however, the analysis of frequency bands is of higher interest than an analysis of the time domain.


Cognitive Decline Peak Frequency Alzheimer Type Topographical Variation Beta Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berger H (1929) On the electroencephalogram of man. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 87:527–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenner RP, Ulrich RF, Spiker DG et al. (1986) Computerized EEG spectralanalysis in elderly normal, demented and depressed subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 64:483–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslau J, Starr A, Sicotte N, Higa J, Buchsbaum MS (1989) Topographic EEG changes with normal aging and SDAT. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coben LA, Danziger WL, Berg L (1983) Frequency analysis of the resting awake EEG in mild senile dementia of Alzheimer type. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:372–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dierks T, Perisic I, Frölich L, Ihl R, Maurer K (1991) Topography of the quantitative electroencephalogram in dementia of the Alzheimer type: Relation to severity of dementia. Psychiatry Res 40:181–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erzigkeit H (1986) Manual zum SKT Formen A-E (Ein Kurztest zur Erfassung von Aufmerksamkeits- und Gedachnisstorungen). Vless, EbersbergGoogle Scholar
  7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”, a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Froelich L, Eilles C, Ihl R, Maurer K, Lanczik M (1989) Stage-dependent reductions of regional blood flow measured by HMPAO-SPECT in dementia of Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res 29:347–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon EB, Sim M (1967) The EEG in presenile dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 30:285–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ihl R, Froelich L, Maurer K, Dierks T, Perisic I (1988) Electrical activity and degree of cognitive impairment in dementia of alzheimer-type. Brain Topogr 1/2:146 (abstr)Google Scholar
  11. Lehmann D, Michel CM (1989) Intracerebral dipole sources of EEG FFT power maps. Brain Topogr 2:155–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehmann D, Michel CM (1990) Intracerebral dipole source localization for FFT power maps. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Letemendia F, Pampligione G (1958) Clinical and electroencephalographic observations in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 21:167–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human services task force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34:939–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohs RC, Cohen L (1988) Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS). Psychopharmacol Bull 24/4:627–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Norcia AM, Sutter EE, Tyler CW (1985) Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of coarse and fine disparity mechanism in human. Vision Res 25: 1603–1611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penttilä M, Partanen JV, Soininen H, Riekkinen PJ (1985) Quantitative analysis of occipital EEG in different stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Primavera A, Novello P, Finocchi C, Canevari E, Corsello L (1990) Correlation between mini-mental state examination and quantitative electroencephalography in senile dementia of Alzheimer type. Neuropsychobiology 23:74–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reisberg B, London E, Ferris SH, Borenstein BA, Scheler L, de Leon MJ (1983) The brief cognitive rating scale: language, motoric, and mood concomitans in primary degenerative dementia. Psychopharmacol Bull 19/4:702–708Google Scholar
  20. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davies KL (1984) A new rating scale for Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 14:1356–1364Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Dierks
    • 1
  • K. Maurer
  • L. Frölich
  • R. Ihl
  1. 1.Abt. für PsychiatrieUniversitäts-Nervenklinik WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations