Skip to main content

Comparison of Single-Channel and Multichannel Magnetoencephalogram Recordings

  • Conference paper
Book cover Imaging of the Brain in Psychiatry and Related Fields
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

The neuronal intracellular currents which produce magnetic fields (Okada 1989; Wikswo et al. 1981) can be detected outside the head by a sensitive magnetometer, the SQUID (super conducting quantum interference device) (Zimmerman et al. 1970). The record of the spontaneous or evoked magnetic fields is called the magnetoencephalogram (MEG) and of the electric recording, the electroencephalogram (EEG). The main difference between EEG and MEG is that the magnetic field of the MEG – in contrast to the EEG – is almost never influenced by the different conductivities of different tissues, such as brain, cerebrospinal fluid, or bone (Peters and de Munck 1990); thus the MEG has advantages over the EEG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barth DS, Sutherling W, Engel J Jr, Beatty J (1982) Neuromagnetic localization of epileptiform spike activity in the human brain. Science 218:891–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RM, Romani GL, Barbanera S, Leoni R, Modena I, Ricci GB, Campitelli F (1983) SQUID instrumentation and the relative covariance for magnetic 3D localization of pathological cerebral sources. Lett Nuovo Cimento 38(2):549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Cuffin BN, Yunokucki K, Maniewski R, Purcell C, Cosgrove GR, Ives J, Kennedy JG, Schomer DL (1990) MEG versus EEG: localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann Neurol 28:811–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grummich P, Vieth J, Kober H (1991) Magnetic fields of the brain analysed by multiple dipole approach using factor analysis. Clin Phys Physiol Measurement 12[Suppl. A]:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudden F, Hoenig HE, Reichenberger H, Schittenhelm R, Schneider S (1989) Ein Vielkanalsystem zur biomagnetischen Diagnostik in Neurologie und Kardiologie: Prinzip, Methode und erste Ergebnisse. Elektromedica 57:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari R, Hämäläinen M, Ilmoniemi R, Lounasma OV (1991) MEG versus EEG localization test. Ann Neurol 30:222–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada YC (1989) Recent developments on the physiological basis of magnetoencephalography (MEG). In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M (eds) Advances in biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, pp 273–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, de Munck J (1990) On the forward and the inverse problem for EEG and MEG. In: Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani GL (eds) Auditory evoked fields and electric potentials. Advances in audiology. Karger, Basel, pp 70–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani GL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L (1982) Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 216:1339–1340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato S (1991) Localization of epileptiform activity. In: Bachmann K, Stefan H, Vieth J (eds) Multichannel biomagnetic recording. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DB, Sidman RD, Flanigin H, Henke J, Labiner D (1985) A reliable method for localizing deep intracranial sources of the EEG. Neurology 35:1702–1707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J (1990a) Magnetoencephalography in the study of stroke (cerebrovascular accident). In: Sato S (ed) Advances in neurology, vol 54. Raven, New York, pp 261–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J (1990b) State of the multichannel magnetoencephalography. Biomed Tech 35 [Suppl3]:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J, Schiller P (1989) Die Magnetoenzephalographie und ihre Moglichkeiten. In: Stefan H (ed) Praoperative Diagnostik fur die Epilepsiechirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J, Stefan H, Meyer C, Hauck D, Schüler P (1988) Herdbefunde in MEG und EEG. In: Speckmann EJ, Palm DG (eds) Epilepsie 87. Einhorn, Reinbek, pp 394–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J, Grummich P, Sack G, Kober H, Schneider S, Abraham-Fuchs K, Kerber U, Ganslandt O, Schmidt T (1990a) Three dimensional localization of the pathological area in cerebrovascular accidents with multichannel magnetoencephalography. Biomed Tech 35 [Suppl 2]:238–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J, Sack G, Grummich P, Schueler P, Schneider S, Abraham-Fuchs K, Kober H, von Harsdorf S, Kerber U, Luthin D (1990b) Areas of pathological activity localized by single- and by multi-channel MEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:S158–S159

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieth J, Schiiler P, Sack G, Ganslandt O, Dratz W, Fischer H, Grimm U (1992) Extracranial slow magnetic field changes during epileptic activity. In: Haschke W, Speckmann EJ (eds) Slow activity changes in the brain. Birkhauser, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikswo JP, Henry WP, Friedman RN, Kilroy AW, Wijesinghe RS, van Egeraat JM, Milek MA (1989) Intraoperative recording of the magnetic field of a human nerve. In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M (eds) Advances in biomagnetism. Plenum, New York, pp 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto T, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L, Nicholson C, Llinas R (1988) Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 8732–8736

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JE, Thieme P, Harding JT (1970) Design and operation of stable rf-biased superconducting point contact quantum device, a note on the properties of perfectly clean metal contacts, J Appl Physics 41:1572–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vieth, J. (1993). Comparison of Single-Channel and Multichannel Magnetoencephalogram Recordings. In: Maurer, K. (eds) Imaging of the Brain in Psychiatry and Related Fields. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77087-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77087-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77089-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77087-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics