Discussion: Evaluation in Constructing Neuropsychological Treatments

Conference paper


Each of the papers just presented discussed some selected aspects of methodology, and it is a little difficult to comment on such discussions. Probably no one would object to most of the statements and proposals made. Undoubtedly it is true “that investigators should spend more effort on choosing appropriate measures, particularly measures that demonstrate the clinical utility of the intervention being studied” (Wade). Therefore, one way out for a discussant is to concentrate on those aspects the speakers decided to put less weight on or to exclude.


Grip Force Cerebellar Disease Package Strategy Maximal Grip Force Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Diller L, Weinberg J (1986) Learning from failures in perceptual cognitive retraining in stroke. In: Uzzel BP, Gross Y (eds) Clinical neuropsychology of intervention. Nijhoff, Boston, pp 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dobkin BH (1989) Focused stroke rehabilitation programs do not improve outcome. Arch Neurol 46: 701–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Garfield SL, Bergin AE (eds) (1986) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Greenwald AG, Pratkanis AR, Leippe MR, Baumgardner MH (1986) Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychol Rev 93: 216–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heide FJ, Borkovec TD (1984) Relaxation-induced anxiety. Mechanism and theoretical implications. Behav Res Ther 22: 1–12Google Scholar
  6. Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting tasks with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71: 59–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kazdin AE (1986) The evalulation of psychotherapy: research design and methodology. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE (eds) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 23–68Google Scholar
  8. Mai N (1989) Residual control of isometric finger forces in hemiparetic patients. Evidence for dissociation of performance deficits. Neurosci Lett 101: 347–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mai N, Bolsinger P, Avarello M, Diener HC, Dichgans J (1988) Control of isometric finger force in patients with cerebellar disease. Brain 11: 973–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mai N, Diener HC, Dichgans J (1989) On the role of feedback in maintaining constant grip force in patients with cerebellar disease. Neurosci Lett 99: 340–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reding MJ, McDowell FH (1989) Focused stroke rehabilitation programs improve outcome. Arch Neurol 46: 700–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zihl J (1981) Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness. Effect of specific practice with saccadic localization. Exp Brain Res 44: 159–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zihl J, von Cramon D (1985) Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. Brain 108: 335–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Mai

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations