Development pp 459-478 | Cite as

Skeletal Muscle Differentiation

  • Deborah F. Pinney
  • Charles P. EmersonJr.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is one of the best characterized cell types in multicellular eucaryotic animals and is a striking example of the relationship between structural organization and differentiated function. Skeletal muscle has been the subject of intense cell biological and biochemical investigations that have led to a detailed understanding of the molecular basis of contraction. In recent years, there has been progress in studies of the embryological origin of skeletal muscle cells and in related studies on the molecular genetic mechanisms that regulate skeletal muscle cell differentiation and the expression of contractile protein genes. This recent progress has made the skeletal muscle a paradigm for understanding the fundamental molecular and genetic mechanisms of cellular differentiation.

Keywords

Hydrolysis Recombination Mold Titan Oligomerization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Emerson CP Jr, Bernstein SI (1987) Molecular genetics of myosin. Annu Rev Biochem 56:695–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Engel AG, Banker BQ (eds) (1986) Myology, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Epstein HF, Fischman DA (1991) Molecular analysis of protein assembly in muscle development. Science 251:1039–1044.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harold FM (1986) The vital force: a study of bioenergetics. WH Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Maclntyre RS, Davis MB (1987) A genetic and molecular analysis of the α-glycerophosphate cycle in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Ratazzi MC, Scandalios JG, Whitt GS (eds) Isozymes: Current topics in biological and medical research, vol 14. Molecular and cellular biology. Alan R Liss, New York, p 195.Google Scholar
  6. Martini R (1989) Fundamentals of anatomy and physiology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. 2.
    Buckingham ME (1985) Actin and myosin multigene families: their expression during the formation of skeletal muscle. Essays Biochem 20:77–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhoot GK, Perry SV (1979) Distribution of polymorphic forms of troponin components and tropomyosin in skeletal muscle. Nature 278:714–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller JB, Stockdale FE (1987) What muscle cells know that nerves don’t tell them. Trends Neurosci 10:325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peckham M, Molloy JE, Sparrow JC, White DCS (1990) Physiological properties of the dorsal longitudinal flight muscle and the tergal depressor of the trochanter muscle of Drosophila melanogaster. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 11:203–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pette D, Vrbova G (1985) Neural control of phenotypic expression in mammalian muscle fibers. Muscle Nerve 8:676–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Waterston RH (1989) Molecular genetic approaches to the study of motility in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Motil Cytoskel 14:136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Whalen RG (1985) Myosin isoenzymes as molecular markers for muscle physiology. J Exp Biol 115:43–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 3.
    Bucher EA, Charles de la Brousse F, Emerson CP Jr (1989) Developmental and muscle specific regulation of avian fast skeletal troponin T isoform expression by mRNA splicing. J Biol Chem264:12482–12491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dibb NJ (1989) Sequence analysis of the complete Caenorhabditis elegans myosin heavy chain gene family. J Mol Biol 205:603–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. George EL, Ober MB, Emerson CP Jr (1989) Functional domains of the Drosophila melanogaster muscle myosin heavy chain gene are encoded by alternatively spliced exons. Mol Cell Biol 9:2957–2974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadal-Ginard B (1990) Muscle cell differentiation and alternative splicing. Curr Opinion Cell Biol 2:1058–1064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 4.
    Bejsovec A, Anderson P (1990) Functions of the myosin ATP and actin binding sites are required for C. elegans thick filament assembly. Cell 60:133–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collier VL, Kronert WA, O’Donnell PT, Edwards KA, Bernstein SI (1990) Alternative myosin hinge regions are utilized in a tissue-specific fashion that correlates with muscle contraction speed. Genes Dev 4:885–895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dibb NJ, Brown DM, Karn J, Moerman DG, Bolton SL, Waterston RJ (1985) Sequence analysis of mutations that affect the synthesis, assembly, and enzymatic activity of the unc-54 myosin heavy chain of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 183:543–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engel AG, Banker BQ (eds) (1986) Myology, vol 2. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Fyrberg E, Fyrberg CC, Beall C, Saville DL (1990) Drosophila melanogaster troponin-T mutations engender three distinct syndromes of myofibrillar abnormalities. J Mol Biol 216:657–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Homyk T Jr, Emerson CP Jr (1988) Functional interactions between unlinked muscle genes within haploinsufficient regions of the Drosophila genome. Genetics 119:105–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karlik CC, Fyrberg EA (1985) An insertion within a variably spliced tropomyosin gene blocks accumulation of only one encoded isoform. Cell 41:57–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karlik CC, Coutu MD, Fyrberg EA (1984) A nonsense mutation within the Act88F actin gene disrupts myofibril formation in Drosophila indirect flight muscles. Cell 38:711–719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koenig M, Hoffman EP, Bertelson CJ, Monaco AP, Feener C, Kunkel L (1987) Complete cloning of the Duchenne muscle dystrophy (DMD) cDNA and preliminary genomic organization of the DMD gene in normal and affected individuals. Cell 50:509–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanigawa G, Jarcho JA, Kass S, Solomon SD, Vosberg H-P, Seidman J, Seidman CE (1990) A molecular basis for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an α/β cardiac myosin heavy chain hybrid gene. Cell 62:991–998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waterston RH (1989) The minor myosin heavy chain, mchA, of Caenorhabditis elegans is necessary for the initiation of thick filament assembly. EMBO J 8:3429–3436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 5.
    Clegg CH, Linkart TA, Olwin BB, Hauschka SD (1987) Growth factor control of skeletal muscle differentiation: commitment to terminal differentiation occurs in G 1 phase and is repressed by fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Biol 105:949–956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horlick RA, Benfield PA (1989) The upstream muscle-specific enhancer of the rat muscle creatine kinase gene is composed of multiple elements. Mol Cell Biol 9:2396–2413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Konigsberg IR (1963) Clonal analysis of myogenesis. Science 140:1273–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenthal N (1989) Muscle cell differentiation. Curr Opinions Cell Biol 1:1094–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 6.
    Benezra R, Davis RL, Lockshon D, Turner DL, Weintraub H (1990) The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loophelix DNA binding proteins. Cell 61:49–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olson EN (1990) MyoD family: a paradigm for development? Genes Dev 4:1454–1461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinney DF, Pearson-White SH, Konieczny SF, Latham KE, Emerson CP Jr (1988) Myogenic lineage determination and differentiation: evidence for a regulatory gene pathway. Cell 53:781–793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinney DF, Charles de la Brousse F, Emerson CP Jr (1990) Molecular genetic basis of skeletal muscle determination and differentiation. In: Mahowald A (ed) Genetics of pattern formation and growth control. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 65–89.Google Scholar
  37. Weintraub H, Davis R, Tapscott S, Thayer M, Krause M, Benezra R, Blackwell TK, Turner D, Rupp R, Hollenberg S, Zhuang Y, Lassar A (1991) The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science 251:761–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 7.
    Brennan TJ, Olson EN (1990) Myogenin resides in the nucleus and acquires high affinity for a conserved enhancer element upon heterodimerization. Genes Dev 4:582–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Brennan TJ, Edmondson DG, Olson EN (1990) Aberrant regulation of MyoDl contributes to the partially defective myogenic phenotype of BC3H1 cells. J Cell Biol 110:929–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Buskin JN, Hauschka SD (1989) Identification of a myocytespecific nuclear factor which binds to the muscle-specific enhancer of the mouse muscle creatine kinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 9:2627–2640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Konieczny SF, Drobes BL, Menke SL, Taparowsky EJ (1989) Inhibition of myogenic differentiation by the H-ras oncogene is associated with the down regulation of the MyoD1 gene. Oncogene 4:473–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mueller PR, Wold B (1989) In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCR. Science 246:780–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murre C, McCaw PS, Vaessin H, Caudy M, Jan LY, Jan YN, Cabrera CV, Buskin JN, Hauschka SD, Lassar AB, Weintraub H, Baltimore D (1989) Interactions between heterolo-gous helix-loop-helix proteins generate complexes that bind specifically to a common DNA sequence. Cell 58:537–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorrentino V, Pepperkok R, Davis RL, Ansorge W, Philipson L (1990) Cell proliferation inhibited by MyoD1 independently of myogenic differentiation. Nature 345:813–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vaidya TB, Rhodes SJ, Taparowsky EJ, Konieczny SF (1989) Fibroblast growth factor and transforming growth factor β repress transcription of the myogenic regulatory gene MyoDl. Mol Cell Biol 9:3576–3579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yutzey KE, Rhodes SJ, Konieczny SF (1990) Differential trans-activation associated with the muscle regulatory factors MyoDl, myogenin and MRF4. Mol Cell Biol 10:3934–3944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 8.
    Balinski BI, Fabian BC (1981) An introduction to embryology. Saunders College Publ, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  48. Drake CJ, Little CD (1991) Integrins play an essential role in somite adhesion to the embryonic axis. Dev Biol 143:418–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kenny-Mobbs T, Thorogood P (1987) Autonomy of differentiation in avian brachial somites and the influence of adjacent tissues. Development 100:449–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Königsberg IR (1986) The embryonic origin of muscle. In: Engel A, Banker BQ (eds) Myology, vol 1. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 39–71.Google Scholar
  51. 9.
    Charles de la Brousse F, Emerson CP Jr (1990) Localized expression of a myogenic regulatory gene, qmf1, in the somite dermatome of avian embryos. Genes Dev 4:567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hopwood ND, Pluck A, Gurdon JB (1989) MyoD expression in the forming somite is an early response to mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos. EMBO J 8:3409–3417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sassoon D, Wright WE, Lin V, Lassar A, Weintraub H, Buckingham ME (1989) Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoDl during mouse embryogenesis. Nature 341:303–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scalles JB, Olson EN, Perry M (1990) Two distinct Xenopus genes with homology to MyoDl are expressed before somite formation in early embryogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 10:1516–1524.Google Scholar
  55. Smith JC (1989) Induction and early amphibian development. Curr Top Cell Biol 1:1061–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright WE, Sassoon DA, Lin VK (1989) Myogenin, a factor regulating myogenesis, has a domain homologous to MyoD. Cell 56:607–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 10.
    Bate M (1990) The embryonic development of larval muscles in Drosophila. Development 110:791–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Cowan AE, Mclntosh JR (1985) Mapping the distribution of differentiation potential for intestine, muscle, and hypodermis during early development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell41:923–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Dohrmann C, Azpiazu N, Frasch M (1990) A new Drosophila homeobox gene is expressed in mesodermal precursor cells of distinct muscle during embryogenesis. Genes Dev 4:2098–2111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Krause M, Fire A, Harrison SW, Priess J, Weintraub H (1990) CeMyoD accumulation defines the body wall muscle cell fate during C. elegans embryogenesis. Cell 63:907–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Michelson AM, Abmayr SM, Bate M, Arias AM, Maniatis T (1990) Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 4:2086–2097.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100:64–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah F. Pinney
  • Charles P. EmersonJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations