Advertisement

Evolution pp 83-98 | Cite as

The Formation of Species

  • Charles Devillers
  • Jean Chaline

Abstract

Let us sit on the terrace of a street cafe and watch the crowds pass by. The first basic unit we observe is the individual: tall, small, fat, long-faced, round-faced — the diversity is large. Among these individuals there will be a few with particular features, such as colour of skin or type of hair, which differ from the vast majority of local individuals, thereby indicating that they originated from another part of the world. We shall install a video camera at this site and will carry out the same observations simultaneously in Paris, Dakar, and Tokyo. When the films are then brought together and shown in the same room, the observers will not fail to note that the individuals of one city have certain dominant characteristic which set them apart from the individuals of the other cities, there is thus a group of individuals who have similar features and constitute a local population. However, despite the particular features characterizing the local population, the various individuals will show a much larger number of common features. Furthermore, they may mix, as shown by couples where the two individuals are from different populations; the children accompanying such couples are proof of their fecundity. The large number of shared common features, and especially the fecundity of these combinations, show that the various individuals belong to the same species.

Keywords

Genetic Programme Parental Species Reproductive Isolation Field Mouse Dumbbell Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Mayr E (1974) Populations, espèces et évolution. Hermann, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Popper K (1954) Misère de l’historicisme. Plon, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonhomme F, Thaler L (1988) L’évolution de la souris. La Recherche 199: 606–616Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaline J (1987) Paléontologie des Vertébrés. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rousseau D-D (1985) Structures des populations quaternaires de Pupilla muscorum (Gastro- pode) en Europe du Nord. Relations avec leurs environnements. Thèse 3e Cycle, Centre des Sciences de la Terre, DijonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villard F (1987) La variation morphologique chez Vallonica costata (Gastropoda, Pulmon- ata) en relation avec le milieu. Thèse EPHE, EPHE, Univ DijonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, Cambridge ( Fac-similé, E Mayr, ed )Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayr E (1982) Processes of speciation In: Mechanisms of speciation. Alan R Liss, New York pp 1–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carson H (1982) Speciation as a major reorganization of polygenic balances In: Mechanisms of speciation. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 411–433Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Powell JR (1978) The founder-flush speciation theory: an experimental approach. Evolution 32 (3): 465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Vries H (1906) Species and varieties, their origin by mutations. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bateson W (1894) Material for the study of variation. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schindewolf O (1950) Grundfragen der Paläontologie. Schweizerbart, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vandel A (1968) La genèse du vivant. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grassé PP (1978) Biologie moléculaire, mutagenése et évolution. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaline J (1984) Le concept d’evolution polyphasée et ses implications. Gebios 17(6): 783– 795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ticehurst CB (1938) A systematic review of the genus Phylloscopus. British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Devillers
    • 1
  • Jean Chaline
    • 2
  1. 1.SceauxFrance
  2. 2.Centre des Sciences de la TerreUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations