Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirische Methoden bei der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs

  • Conference paper
Demenz

  • 120 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Zu Beginn meines Beitrags werde ich einen breiten Überblick über mehrdimensionale Beurteilungsverfahren geben, wobei ich besonders auf die empirische Methode eingehe. Das Modell, das ich vorschlagen werde, ist ein mehrdimensionales Verfahren, das verschiedene Beurteilungsabläufe auf ganz unterschiedlichen Achsen umfaßt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Blessed G, Tomlinson BE, Roth M (1968) The association between quantitative measure of dementia and senile changes in cerebral gray matter of elderly subjects. Br J Psychiatry 114:797–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfeiffer E (1975) Short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kay DWK (1977) The epidemiology and identification of brain deficit in the elderly. In: Eisdorfer C, Freidel RO (eds) Cognitive and emotional disturbances in the elderly. Yearbook Medical Publishers, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Copeland JRM, Kelleher MJ, Kellert JM et al. (1975) Cross-national study of diagnosis of the mental disorders: A comparison of the diagnoses of elderly psychiatric patients admitted to mental hospitals serving Queens County, New York, and the former Borough of Camberwell, London. Br J Psychiatry 126:11–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland JRM, Kelleher MJ, Kellett JM, Gourlay AJ, Gurland BJ, Fleiss JL, Sharpe L (1976) A semi-structured clinical interview for assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly: The geriatric mental state schedule. I. Development and reliability. Psychol Med 6:439–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Copeland JRM, McWilliam C, Dewey ME et al. (1986) The early recognition of dementia in the elderly: a preliminary communication about a longitudinal study using the GMS-AGECAT package (community version). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurland BJ, Kuriansky J, Sharpe L, Simon R, Stiller P, Birkett P (1977) The comprehensive assessment and referral evaluation (CARE)-rationals, development and reliability. Int J Aging Hum Dev 8:9–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurland BJ, Wilder DE (1984) The CARE interview revisited: Development of an efficient, systematic clinical assessment. J Gerontol 39:129–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfeiffer E (1975) Multidimensional functional assessment, the OARS methodology. Duke Univ Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Durham/NC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roth M, Tym E, Mountjoy CQ, Huppert FA, Hendrie M, Verma S, Goddard R (1986) CAMDEX. A standardized instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 149:698–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34:939–944

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leiver VO (1983) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zung WWK (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Overall JE, Gorham DR (1962) The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Res 10:799–812

    Google Scholar 

  17. Overall JE, Gorham DR (1988) Introduction-The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacol Bull 24:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raskin A (1985) Validation of a battery of tests designed to assess psychopathology in the elderly. In: Burrows GD, Norman TR, Dennerstein L (eds) Clinical and pharmacological studies in psychiatric disorders. Libbey, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levin HS, High WM Jr, Goethe KE et al. (1987) The neurobehavioral rating scale: assessment of behavioral sequelae of head injury by the clinician. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gottfries CG, Braine G, Steen G (1982) A new rating scale for dementia syndromes. Gerontology, [Suppl 2] 28:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, deLeon MJ, Crook T (1982) The Global Deterioration Scale (GDS): An instrument of the assessment of primary degenerative dementia (PDD). Am J Psychiatry 139:1136–1139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reisberg B, London E, Ferris SH, Borenstein J, Scheier L, deLeon MJ (1983) The Brief Cognitive Rating Scale: Language, motoric, and mood concomitants in primary degenerative dementia. Psychopharmacol Bull 19:702–708

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Franssen E (1985) An ordinal functional assessment tool for Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Hosp Community Psychiatry 36:593–595

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Linn MW, Linn BS (1982) The Rapid Disability Rating Scale-2. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gurel L, Linn MW, Linn BS (1972) Physical and mental impairment-of-function evaluation in the aged: The PAMIE scale. J Gerontol 27:83–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Erzigkeit H (1989) The SKT — A short cognitive performance test as an instrument for the assessment of clinical efficacy of cognitive enhancers. In: Bergener M, Reisberg B (eds) Senile dementia. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crook T, Ferris SH, McCarthy M (1979) The misplaced objects task: A brief test for memory dysfunction in the aged. J Am Geriatr Soc 27:284–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Crook TH, Johnson BA, Larrabee CJ (1990) Evaluation of drugs in Alzheimer’s disease and age-associated memory impairment. In: Denkert O, Maier W, Rickeis K (eds) Methodology of the evaluation of psychotropic drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  30. Larrabee GJ, Crook TH (1989) Dimensions of everyday memory in age-associated memory impairment. Psychol Assess 1:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohs RC, Rosen WG, Davis KL (1983) The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale: An instrument for assessing treatment efficacy. Psychopharmacol Bull 19:448–449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J. E. Overall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatrischen Klinik mit Poliklinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6-10, D-8520, Erlangen, Deutschland

    Eberhard Lungershausen (Direktor) (Direktor)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Overall, J.E. (1992). Empirische Methoden bei der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs. In: Lungershausen, E. (eds) Demenz. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76932-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76932-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76933-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76932-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation