Advertisement

Psychological Modification and Synergetic Modelling of Perceptual Oscillations

  • P. Kruse
  • M. Stadler
  • D. Strüber
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN, volume 55)

Abstract

The rapidity, ease, and temporal stability of actual genetical order formation in perception suggests a general theoretical concept in which the perceptual process is viewed as a more or less direct informational input. The aspect of autonomous order formation in perception and the question for inner-systemic tendencies which govern the emergence of relation, form, and meaning are lost from view. Following the historical line of Gestalt psychology some old phenomena are revisited which gain special importance in investigating and modelling perceptual processes on the background of self-organization theory. On the basis of spontaneous perceptual oscillations and reorganizations some theoretical and empirical aspects of investigating autonomous order formation in perception are discussed and illustrated. The idea is forwarded that these perceptual phenomena and possibly perception in general can be described and understood best by describing and understanding the underlying dynamics of the cognitive system. Taking the example of perceptual multi- stability the approach of synergetics is favoured as a promising tool for further investigation.

Keywords

Order Formation Binocular Rivalry Relative Duration Intrinsic Dynamic Maximum Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. [1]
    W. Köhler: Dynamics in Psychology, (New York, liveright 1940), pp.5fGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Marr: Vision, (San Francisco, Freeman 1982)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.J. Gibson: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, (Boston, Houghton Mifflin 1979)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    See e.g. W. Köhler: The Task of Gestalt Psychology, (Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press 1969)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Stadler, P. Kruse: The self-organization perspective in cognition research: historical remarks and new experimental approaches, in Synergetics of Cognition, ed. by H. Haken and M. Stadler, (Berlin, Springer 1990), pp. 32–52Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Troxler: Ophthal. Bibliothek. 2,51–53 (1804)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    V. Urbantschitsch: Centralbl. med. Wiss. 13,625–628 (1875)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.P. Guilford: Amer. J. Psychol. 38, 534–538 (1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Stadler, H. Erke: Vision Res. 8,1081–1092 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E.-F. Dutour: Math. Phys. Pres. dDvers Sav. 3, 514–530 (1760)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Wheatstone: Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London 128, 371–394 (1838)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Blake: Psychol. Rev. 96,143–167 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. Porterfield: A Treatize on the Eye, the Manner and Phenomena of Vision, (Edinburgh, Hamilton and Balfour 1795)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    W. Wundt: Philosoph. Stud. 14,1–118 (1898)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Kruse: Delfin 11,35–57 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Kruse, M. Stadler: Stability and instability in cognitive systems: multi- stability, suggestion and psychosomatic interaction, in Synergetics of Cognition, ed. by H. Haken, M. Stadler (Berlin, Springer 1990)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    [WJ.M. Levelt: On Binocular Rivalry, (The Hague, Mounton 1968), p.2Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    See [1], pp. 67fGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A.H. Kawamoto, J.A. Anderson: Acta Psychol. 59,35–65 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. K. Kienker, T. J. Sejnowski, G. E. Hinton, L. E. Schumacher. Perception 15, 197–216 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Haken: Synergetics. An Introduction, (Berlin, Springer 1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. Ditzinger, H. Haken: Biol. Cybern. 61,279–287 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Ditzinger, H. Haken: Biol. Cybern, (in press)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Haken, J.A.S. Kels, H. Bunz: Biol. Cybern. 51, 347–356 (1985)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    J.A.S. Kelso, G. Schöner: Springer Proc. Phys. 19, 224 (1987)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. A. S. Kelso: Phase transitions: foundations of behavior, in Synergetics of Cognition, ed. by H. Haken, M. Stadler (Berlin, Springer 1990)Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    See e.g. G. Schöner, H. Haken, J.A.S. Kelso: Biol. Cybern. 53, 247–257 (1986)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    H. Gräser: Spontane Reversionsprozesse in der Figuralwahrnehmung, (Doct. Thesis, Trier 1977)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. Poston, I. Stewart: Behav. Sci. 23, 318–334 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    W. Metzger: Psychologie, (Dresden, Steinkopff 1941)Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    H.S. Hock, J.A.S. Kelso, G. Schöner: Bistability, hysteresis, and loss of temporal stability in the perceptual organization of apparent motion (in prep.)Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Finlay, T. Caelli: Perception 8,595–602 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    P. Kruse, M. Stadler, T. Wehner: Vision Res. 26, 327–335 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    A. Borsellino, F. Carlini, M. Riani, M. T. Tuccio, A. DeMarco, P. Penengo, A. Trabucco: Perception 11,263–273 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    G. Schöner: Dynamic pattern theory of perceptual organization: An example from apparent movement (in prep.)Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    V.S. Ramachandran, S.M. Anstis. Perception 14,135–143 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Kruse
  • M. Stadler
  • D. Strüber
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenDepartment of PsychologyGermany

Personalised recommendations