Aspects of the Present Heliospheric Research

  • H. J. Fahr
Conference paper
Part of the Reviews in Modern Astronomy book series (MOD.ASTRONOMY, volume 4)

Abstract

First of all the question is raised here why the sun at all is surrounded by a circumsolar heliosphere, instead by a Strömgren sphere configuration. The fact that counts most in this context is the evident peculiar motion of the sun relative to the ambient interstellar medium. An interesting puzzle thus is how the inner heliospheric plasma properties reflect this fact. Here we briefly will follow the lines by which the interstellar medium influences the heliospheric plasma.

Neutrals and ions are strongly coupled in interstellar/interplanetary space by mutual charge exchange reactions. Over distance scales of the order of charge exchange mean free paths the thermodynamic state of neutral and ionized media thereby is mutually communicated. In the following we study the penetration of neutral interstellar atoms through the perturbed plasma region ahead of the solar system into the inner regions of the heliosphere where their presence has been proven by their typical resonance glows. First we give the main outlines of the theory connected with this problem and then address in detail the question of the neutral hydrogen and oxygen presence in the heliosphere. The conclusion is reached that for interstellar ion densities of 10−2 cm −3 or greater neutral LISM hydrogen or oxygen will be depleted at least by factors of 0.5 or 0.1, respectively. The problem still stands whether or not the anomalous cosmic ray components showing up as He+,O +,Ne +,N +-ions of about 10 MeV/Nucleon in the inner heliosphere can be ascribed to LISM neutrals entering the heliosphere and becoming ionized and reenergized there.

We follow these claims for the origin of the anomalous cosmic rays and discuss in this context quantitative results connected with theoretical predictions for the LISM penetration into the heliosphere. We reach the conclusion that the ratios between the production rates for He+,O +,Ne +,N +-ions cannot be brought into accordance with those values needed to explain the anomalous cosmic ray observations, unless element-specific reenergization efficiencies are admitted.

Keywords

Filtration Convection Recombination Helium Suffix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baranov, V.B. and Lebedev, M. (1989): COSPAR-Symposium on “Physics of the outer heliosphere”, Warsaw, Sept. 1989, Pergamon Press, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  2. Baranov, V.B. (1990): Space Science Reviews, 52, 89–120CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt, J.C. (1964): Icarus, 3, 253CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleszinski, S. (1987): Astron. Astrophys., 180, 201ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, A.G.W. (1973): Space Sci. Rev., 14, 392CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, D.P. and Reynolds, R.J. (1987): Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 25, 303CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahr, H.J. (1980): Mitt. Astron. Gesellschaft, 47, 233–276ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahr, H.J. (1986): Advances Space Res., 6 (2), 13CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Fahr, H.J. (1989): “Filtration of the interstellar neutrals at the heliospheric interface and their coupling to the solar wind”, COSPAR-Symposium on “Physics of the Outer Heliosphere”, Warsaw ( Poland ) Sept. 1989, Pergamon Press, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahr, H,J. (1990): “Local interstellar oxygen in the heliosphere: its analytic representation and observational consequences”, Astron. Astrophys., in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahr, H.J. and Fichtner, H. (1990): “Causes and consequences for a three dimensional structure of the heliosphere”, Space Science Reviews, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahr, H.J. and Neutsch, W. (1983): Astron. Astrophys., 118, 57MATHADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahr, H.J. and Ripken, H.W. (1984): Astron. Astrophys., 139, 551ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Fahr, H.J., Fichtner, H., and Neutsch, W. (1990): Planet. Space Sci., 38, 383CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Fahr, H.J., Rucinski, D., and Nass, H.U. (1987): Ann.Geophys., A5, 255ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisk, L.A. (1976a): J. Geophys. Res., 81, 4633CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisk, L.A. (19766): J. Geophys. Res., 81, 4641Google Scholar
  18. Fisk, L.A. (1976c): Astrophys, J., 206, 333CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisk,L.A. (1986): In “The sun and the heliosphere in three dimensions”, pp. 401, Ed. by R.G. Marsden, D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Doordrecht HollandGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisk, L.A., Kozlovsky, B., and Ramaty, R. (1974): Astrophys. J., 190, L35Google Scholar
  21. Frisch, P.C., York, D.G., and Fowler, J.R. (1987): Astrophys. J., 320, 842CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Frisch, P.C., Welty, D.E., York, D.G., and Fowler, J.R. (1989): Astrophys. J. (submitted)Google Scholar
  23. Garcia-Munoz, M., Mason, G.M., and Simpson, J.A. (1973): Astrophys. J., 182, L81CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Garcia-Munoz, M., Mason, G.M., and Simpson, J.A. (1975): Astrophys. J., 202, 265CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Gleeson, L.J. and Axford, W.I. (1968a): Astrophys.J., 154, 1011CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Gleeson, L.J. and Axford, W.I. (19686): Astrophys. Space Sci., 2, 431Google Scholar
  27. Gleeson, L.J. and Urch, I.H. (1971): Astrophys. Space Sci., 11, 288CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Isenberg, P.A. (1987): J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1067CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Jokipii, J.R. (1971): Rev. Geophys. Space Res., 9, 27CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Jokipii, J.R. (1986): In “The sun and the heliosphere in three dimensions” pp. 375, Ed. by. R.G. Marsden, D. Reidel Publ. Comp., Doordrecht HollandGoogle Scholar
  31. Klecker, B. (1977): J. Geophys. Res., 82, 5287CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Klecker, B., Hovestadt, D., Gloeckler, G., and Fan, C.Y. (1977): Astrophys. J., 212, 290CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsuda, T., Fujimoto, Y., Shima, E., Sawada, K., and Inaguchi, T. (1989): Progress of Theoret. Physics, 81, 810–822Google Scholar
  34. Möbius, E. D., Hovestadt, D., Klecker, B., Scholer, M., Gloeckler, G., Ipavich, F.M, and Lühr, H. (1986): Nature, 318, 426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Möbius, E.D., Klecker, B., Hovestadt, D., and Scholer, M. (1988): Astrophys. Space. Sci., 144, 487ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker, E.N. (1958): Astrophys. J., 128, 664CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker, E.N. (1963): In “Interplanetary dynamical processes”, Interscience Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds, R.J. (1989): “Lower limit on the ionization fraction of the very local medium”, Preprint, Symposium on COSMIC GAS DYNAMICS, Moscow ( USSR ), Oct. 1988Google Scholar
  39. Ripken, H.W. and Fahr, H.J. (1983): Astron. Astrophys., 122, 181ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Siscoe, G.L. and Mukherjee, N.R. (1972): J. Geophys. Res., 77, 6042CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Shima, E., Takuya, M., and Inaguchi, T. (1986): Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 221, 687ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. Strömgren, B. (1939): Astrophys. J., 89, 856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallis, M.K. (1984): Astron. Astrophys., 130, 200ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, K.G. (1965): Astrophys. J., 142, 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Fahr
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Astrophysik und Extraterrestrische ForschungUniversität BonnBonn 1Fed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations