Automated Detection of Bacterial Growth for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Many pathogens show highly variable in vitro antibiotic susceptibility test patterns. Availability of susceptibility results on organisms isolated from the patient is most important in assisting the clinician in selection of therapeutic agents. Unfortunately, most susceptibility testing procedures require considerable time for completion. Therefore, the choice of antimicrobial drug depends on disease symptoms, and the anticipated susceptibility pattern of organisms likely to cause such symptoms. Additionally, local susceptibility patterns are monitored to avoid prescribing drugs to which the population is resistant and to detect emergence of new resistant patterns or newly resistant strains.
KeywordsAntibiotic Susceptibility Bacterial Mass Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex Susceptibility Test Result Muller Hinton Broth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barry AL (1989) Standardization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: Schoenknecht FD, Tenover FC (eds) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinic Lan Med 9: 203–219Google Scholar
- Bascomb S (1987) Enzyme tests in bacterial identification. Methods Microbio 119:105–160Google Scholar
- Gill VJ, Witebsky FG, MacLowry JD (1989) Multicategory interpretive reporting of susceptibility testing with selected antimicrobial concentrations; ten years of laboratory and clinical experience. In: Schoenknecht FD, Tenover FC (eds) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinic Lab Med 9: 221–238Google Scholar
- Hojer H, Nilsson L, Ansehn S, Thore A (1976) In-vitro effect of doxycyline on levels of adenosine triphosphate in bacterial cultures: possible clinical applications. Scan J Infect Dis (Suppl) 9: 58–61Google Scholar
- Kanazawa Y, Kuramata T (1966) Resazurin disc method for rapid determination of drug sensitivities of microorganisms. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 19: 229–233Google Scholar
- Kiehlbauch J, Kendle JM, Carlson LG, Schoenknecht FD, Plorde JJ (1989) Automated antibiotic susceptibility testing: comparative evaluation of four commercial systems and present state. In: Schoenknecht FD, Tenover FC (eds) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical Lab Med 9: 319–340Google Scholar
- Kroemer G, Bruckler J, Blobel H (1977) Use of microtiter-system for the determination of the antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci with tetrazolium salts. Zentralbl Bakteriol Hyg I Abt Orig A 239: 42–45Google Scholar
- Matteo MR et al. (1980) Abstr Annu Meet Am Soc Microbiol c201, p308Google Scholar
- Tenover FC (1989) DNA Probes for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: Schoenknecht FD, Tenover FC (eds) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinic Lab Med 9: 341–347Google Scholar
- Tomioka H, Yamada Y, Saito H, Jidoi J (1989) Susceptibilities of Mycobacterium leprae and M.avium complex to the H2O2-Fe-mediated halogenation system supplemented with antimicrobial agents. Int J Leprosy 57: 628–632Google Scholar
- Urban T, Jarstrand C (1979) Nitroblue tetrazolium ( NBT) reduction by bacteria. Acta Path Microbiol Scand Sect B 87: 227–233Google Scholar