Does Defibrillation Obey the Fundamental Law of Electrostimulation?
Since the introduction of external DC defibrillation, it has been common to use the energy as the defibrillation dose. This has historical reasons, as external defibrillators could not measure the voltage applied to the paddles, the current, or the duration of the pulse, as is usually done in electrostimulation. The only measurable quantity was the voltage to which the output capacitor was charged. Using the well-known formula that the stored energy is equal to half the capacitance of the charged capacitor times the voltage squared, the manufacturers were able to specify the energy of a pulse. This expedient in defining the dosage has greatly influenced the thinking of those engaged in defibrillation. Nonetheless, one has to ask whether the current practice is in accordance with the theories of electrostimulation and, if not, whether defibrillation obeys the laws of electrostimulation!
KeywordsPermeability Catheter Posite Auger Dura
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Auger PM, Bardou A, Coulombe A Et Al. (1989) Computer stimulation of defibrillating electric shocks: critical mass. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 11th Ann Int Conf, pp 75–76Google Scholar
- 2.Borman JB, Tannenbaum J, Merin B et al. (1971) External-internal defibrillation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62: 98–105Google Scholar
- 3.Braunwald E, Ross F, Sonnenblick EH (1967) Mechanisms of contraction of the normal and failing heart. Little, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dillon SM, Wit AL (1989) Action potential prolongation by shock as a possible mechanism for electrical defibrillation. Circulation 80: 11 - 96Google Scholar
- 8.Ideker RE, Krassowska W, Wharton JM Et Al. (1989) Experimental results pertinent to the modelling of defibrillation. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 11th Ann Int Conf, pp 77–78Google Scholar
- 9.Irnich W (1976) Elektrotherapie des Herzens - physiologische und biotechnische Aspekte. Schiele and Schön, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 10.Irnich W (1985) The electrode myocardial interface. Clin Prog Electro- physiol Pacing 3: 338–348Google Scholar
- 14.Lapicque L (1909) Definition expérimentale de l’excitabilité. Soc Biol 77: 280–283Google Scholar
- 15.McDaniel WC, Schuder JC (1985) The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold-inherent limitations in its interpretation. AAMI 20th Ann Meeting, Boston, May 6–8Google Scholar
- 22.Weiss G (1901) Sur la possibilité de rendre comparable entre eux les appareils servant a 1’excitation électrique. Arch Ital Biol 35: 413–446Google Scholar