Issues in Cultural Ergonomics

  • Michael Kaplan
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 73)


It is time for tomorrow’s world...


Human Factor Voice Communication Nuclear Regulatory Commission International Civil Aviation Organization Italic Mine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allnutt, M. (1990). Personal communication [Army Personnel Research Establishment, Farnborough, UK].Google Scholar
  2. Aviation Safety Reporting System. (1990). Foreign language difficulties (Special Request No. 1815 ). Mountain View, CA: Battelle Columbus, Division ASRS Office.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, S. (1989). Personal communication [British Civil Aviation Authority, Farnborough,UK].Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. (1990). Personal communication [EUROCONTROL Institute of Air Navigation Services].Google Scholar
  5. Booher, H. R., & Rouse, W. B. (1990). MANPRINT as the competitive edge. In H. R. Booher (Ed), MANPRINT: An approach to systems integration. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  6. Bornstein, M. (1985). Infant into adult: unity to diversity in the development of visual categorization. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bradbury, J. N. (1990). Personal communication [International Civil Aviation Organization].Google Scholar
  8. CCITT Study Group XlI-R5. (1985). Results of category judgment tests on wideband speech codecs (Report of Study Group X11–R5, Consultative Committee on International Telegraphy and Telephony, Appendix 3, Annex F). Geneva: International Telecommunications Union.Google Scholar
  9. Chapanis, A. (Ed.) (1975). Ethnic variables in human factors engineering. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cole, M., & Means, B. (1981) Comparative studies of how people think: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univers. Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Defence Research Group. (1989). Computer-human interaction in command and control(Final Report). Brussels: NATO Document AC/243(Panel 8/RSG.12)D/7.Google Scholar
  13. Eysenck, H. J., & Slater, P. (1958). Effects of practice and rest on fluctuations in the Muller-Google Scholar
  14. Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 49,246–256.Google Scholar
  15. EUROCONTROL Institute of Air Navigation Services. (1990). Training programme 1991. Luxembourg: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.Google Scholar
  16. Foushee, H. C. (1990). Development of a national plan for addressing future aviation human factors needs. Presentation to the ICAO Human Factors Symposium, Leningrad, USSR, Apri14, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Fudakoski, T. (1990). Personal communication [Transport Canada].Google Scholar
  18. Gleiss, N., & Renhall, P. (1986). Measurements of picture quality. TELE, 40, 21–25.(Sweden.)Google Scholar
  19. Gleiss, N. (1989). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  20. Hendrick, H. W. (1987). Macroergonomics: a concept whose time has come. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 30 (2), 1–3.Google Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Irvine, D. H. (1974). A new type of speech intelligibility test. Ergonomics, 17, 783–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan, M. (In press). Cultural ergonomics: an evolving focus for military human factors. In R. Gal & A. D. Mangelsdorff (Eds.), A handbook of military psychology. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Karnas, G. (1970). Analyse d’un poste de contrôle-décision: les stratégies op’ratoires descontrôleurs de la vente de places d’avion [Analysis of a reservation office: Operating strategies of airline ticket agents]. Le Travail Humain, 33, 59–76.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, G., Orasanu, J., & Calderwood, R. (Eds.) (In press). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  26. Leplat, J. (1980 a). Ergonomic pyschology in French-speaking countries. French-Language Psychology, 1, 307–318. Google Scholar
  27. Leplat, J. ( 1980 b). La psychologie ergonomique [Ergonomic psychology]. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
  28. Leplat, J. (1982). Personal discussion [Laboratoire de Psychologie du Travail, Paris].Google Scholar
  29. Leplat, J., & Hoc, J-M. (1981). Subsequent verbalization in the study of cognitive processes. Ergonomics, 24, 743–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lichte, W. H., & Borresen, C. R. (1967). Influence of instructions on shape constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 538–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Madni, A. M. (1988). The role of human factors in expert systems design and acceptance. Human Factors, 30, 395–414.Google Scholar
  32. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, G. A., & Selfridge, J. A. (1950). Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material.Google Scholar
  35. American Journal of Psychology,63, 176–185.Google Scholar
  36. Montmollin, M. de (1984). L’intelligence de la tache: Eléments d’ergonomie cognitive [Task intelligence: Elements of cognitive ergonomics]. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  37. Moser, H. M., & Dreher, J. J. (1953). Comparison of the US-UK and ICAO phonetic alphabets (Technical Report 519–3, part II). The Ohio State University Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. O’Brien, J. N., & Haber, S. J. ( 1989 ). Draft of the implementation plan for pilot testing the nuclear organization and management analysis concept. Engineering Technology Division, Brookhaven National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  39. Ombredane, A., & Faverge, J. M. (1955). L’analyse du travail. [The analysis of work]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  40. Phillips, L. D., & Wright, G. N. (1977). Cultural differences in viewing uncertainty and assessing probabilities. In H. Jungermann & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision,making and change in human affairs. Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  41. Pisoni, D. B. (1978). Speech perception. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., & Leplat, J. (1987). New technology and human error. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Rosch, E. (1975). Universals and cultural specifics in human categorization. In R. Brislin, S. Bochner, & W. Lonner (Eds.), Cross-Cultural perspectives on learning. New York: Halstead Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, S., Bergman, M., Plester, D., El-Mofty, A. & Satti, M.H. (1962). Presbycusis study of a relatively noise-free population in the Sudan Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 71, 727–743.Google Scholar
  46. Ruffell-Smith, H. P. (1975). Some problems of voice communication for international aviation. In A. Chapanis (Ed.), Ethnic variables in human factors engineering. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ryan, T. G. (1990). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  48. Shouksmith, G., & Burrough, S. (1988). Job stress factors for New Zealand and Canadian air traffic controllers. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 37, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singleton, W. T. (1984). Academic progress in human factors during the N.A.T.O.programme, 1967–1983. Ergonomics, 27, 833–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singleton, W. T. (1989). The mind at work: Psychological ergonomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singleton, W. T. (1990). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  52. Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures and A second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Soderquist, D. R. (1970). Frequency analysis and the critical band. Psychonomic Science, 21, 117–119.Google Scholar
  54. Stager, P., Proulx, P., Walsh, B., & Fudakowski, T. (1980). Bilingual air traffic control in Canada. Human Factors, 22, 655–670.Google Scholar
  55. Tanner, W. P., Jr., & Rivette, C. L. (1964). Experimental study of tone deafness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1465–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Triandis, H. C. (1967). Interpersonal relations in international organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wise, J. A., & McConville, K. (1989). A cross-cultural survey of personal preferences in design and operation of a lunar base. Paper presented at Human Factors Society meetings, October 18, 1989.Google Scholar
  58. Wright, G. N., Phillips, L. D., Whalley, P., Choo, G. T., Ng, K-O., Tan, I., & Wisudha, A. (1978). Cultural differences in probabilistic thinking. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, G. N., & Phillips, L. D. (1980). Cultural variation in probabilistic thinking- Alternative ways of dealing with uncertainty. International Journal of Psychology, 15, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yates, J. F., Zhu, Y., Ronis, D. L., Wang, D-F., Shinotsuka, H., & Toda, M. (1989). Probability judgment accuracy China, Japan, and the United States. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Basic ResearchU. S. Army Research InstituteAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations