Adjustment of Triangulation in Space

  • Martin Hotine


The science of geodesy bears unmistakeable marks of its two-dimensional origin. It is true that geodesists no longer consider that the Earth is flat, in the sense of being expressible in two Euclidian dimensions — we have, in the course of 2000 or more years, progressed to the stage of two non-Euclidian dimensions — but whenever a third dimension obtrudes, as in Nature it must, it is to be got rid of immediately by means of “corrections”, or simply ignored, so that all calculations may be done on a surface.


Equipotential Surface Cartesian Component Plane Triangle Geodetic System Zenith Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


References to Paper 2

  1. Eisenhart L (1960) Riemannian geometry. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Marussi A (1949) Fondements de géométrie différentielle absolue du champ potential terrestre. Bull Géod 14:411–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Marussi A (1950) Principi die geodesia intrinseca applicati al campo di Somigliana. Boll Geod Sci Aff, anno IX: 1–8; = Principles of intrinsic geodesy applied to the field of Somigliana, re-printed in IG, 101–108Google Scholar
  4. McConnell AJ (1931) Applications of the absolute differential calculus. Blackie, LondonGoogle Scholar

References to Editorial Commentary

  1. Blaha G (1984) Tensor structure applied to least squares revisited. Bull Géod 58, 1:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaha G, Bessette R (1989) Non-linear least squares method by an isomorphic geometric setup. Bull Géod 63, 2:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brazier HH, Windsor LM (1957) A test triangulation, a report presented to Study Group No. 1 at the I.A.G. Toronto Assembly. This is a companion to item (4) in this monograph and Hotine’s reference. A test triangulation (1957) in paper 3Google Scholar
  4. Levallois JJ (1963) La réhabilitation de la géodésie classique et la géodésie tridimensionelle. Bull Géod 68:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Reilly WI (1980) Three-dimensional adjustment of geodetic networks with incorporation of gravity field data. Report 160, Dep Sci Ind Res, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  6. Teunissen P (1985) The geometry of geodetic inverse linear mapping and non-linear adjustment. Neth Geod Comm Publ Geod, New Ser 8; 1:177Google Scholar
  7. Vanicek P (1979) Tensor structure and the least squares. Bull Géod 53:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Hotine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations