Advertisement

The Reconstruction of “Genetic Kinship” in Prehistoric Burial Complexes — Problems and Statistics

  • Kurt W. Alt
  • Werner Vach
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

Establishment of kinship in burial complexes has been a desideratum for decades. In recent years, paleoanthropologists have attempted to conduct kinship analyses primarily by means of epigentic variants of the skull. As with other anthropological questions, teeth and maxillary bones seem well suited for the reconstruction of genetic kinship in skeletal material. The authors analyse incidence and distribution of hypodontia in a burial complex and from the distribution of the trait deduce possible genetic relations of it’s bearers. Statistical analysis was applied to test whether the distribution of the trait was random or whether it supports the hypothesis of burial in family-groups.

Keywords

Kinship Analysis Tooth Germ Physical Anthropology Epigenetic Variant Maxillary Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alt, K.W. (1989): Zur Problematik odontologischer Verwandtschaftsanalysen in der prähistorischen Anthropologie am Beispiel der Aplasie/Hypodontie. Z. Morph. Anthrop. 78 43–71.Google Scholar
  2. Alt, K.W. (in press): Zur Epidemiologie der kongenitalen Zahnunterzahl im alamannischen Gräberfeld Neresheim, Ostalbkreis — Ein odontologischer Beitrag zur Verwandtschaftsanalyse. Fundberichte Baden-Württemberg 15.Google Scholar
  3. Cliff, A.D. and Ord, J.K. (1973): Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cliff, A.D. and Ord, J.K. (1981): Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Felgenhauer, F. et al. (1988): Stillfried. Archäologie-Anthropologie. Museumsverein Stillfried. Stillfried.Google Scholar
  6. Hauser, G., De Stefano, G.F. (1989): Epigenetic variants of the human skull.Google Scholar
  7. E. Schweizerbart. Stuttgart. N.N. (1986): Complex sites & infra-and interpopulation distances. In: B. Hermann (Ed.): Innovative trends in prehistoric anthropology. Mitt. d. Bln. Ges. f. Anthrop.-Ethnol. u. Urgesch. 7 51–100.Google Scholar
  8. Kaufmann, B. (1986): Estimation of similarity by combined metric/non metric traits. In: B. Hermann (Ed.): Innovative trends in prehistoric anthropology. Mitt. d. Bln. Ges. f. Anthrop.-Ethnol. u. Urgesch., 7 63–67.Google Scholar
  9. Knußmann, R. (Ed.) (1988): Anthropologie. Bd.I/1. G. Fischer. Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Lewontin, R.C. (1974): The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  11. Rösing, F.W. (1986a): Kith or kin? On the feasibility of kinship reconstruction in skeletons. In: A.R. David (Ed.): Science in Egyptology. Manchester University Press. 223–237.Google Scholar
  12. Rösing, F.W. (1986b): Group report: Kinship analysis. In: B. Hermann (Ed.): Innovative trends in prehistoric anthropology. Mitt. d. Bln. Ges. Anthrop.-Ethnol. u. Urgesch., 7 95–98.Google Scholar
  13. Sen, A. (1976): Large Sample-Size Distribution of Statistics Used in Testing for Spatial Correlation. Geographical Analysis 9, 175–184.Google Scholar
  14. Sjovold, T. (1984): A report on the heritability of some cranial measurements and non-metric traits. In: G.N. van Vark, W.W. Howells (Ed.): Multivariate statistical methods in physical anthropology, 223–246.Google Scholar
  15. Ullrich, H. (1969): Interpretation morphologisch-metrischer Ähnlichkeiten an ur-und frühgeschichtlichen Skeletten in verwandtschaftlicher Hinsicht. Z. Archäol. 3 48–88.Google Scholar
  16. Vach, W., Alt, K.W. (in press): Zur statistischen Analyse der horizontalstratigraphischen Verteilung eines odontologischen (epigenetischen) Merkmals. Fundberichte Baden-Württemberg 15.Google Scholar
  17. Van Vark, G.N, Howells, W.W. (Ed.) (1984): Multivariate statistical methods in physical anthropology. D. Reidel Publ. Comp. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster.Google Scholar
  18. Wiltschke-Schrotta, K. (1988): Das frühbronzezeitliche Gräberfeld von Franzhausen I. Analyse der morphologischen Merkmale mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der epigenetischen Varianten. Nat. Diss. Wien.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang Zhong-pei (1985): The social structure reflected in the Yuan-Junmiao cemetery. J. Anthrop. Archaeol. 4 19-33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt W. Alt
    • 1
  • Werner Vach
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Humangenetik und AnthropologieUniversität FreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Medizinische InformatikUniversität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations