Advertisement

Causal Analysis in Marketing Research with LISREL or a Combination of Traditional Multivariate Methods?

  • Jochen Benz
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

There are two fundamentally different ways of performing a causal analysis: Simultaneous methods (e.g. LISREL) or the successive use of the “traditional” methods of factor analysis and regression analysis. In this paper, the investigation of both alternatives in a Monte Carlo study shows that there are advantages and disadvantages of both methods. However, when applied simultaneously on the same data, they may complement each other in an efficient way. Furthermore, in the study are compared the estimation methods in both cases, regarding the criteria robustness and quality of estimation.

Keywords

Combination Method Causal Analysis Marketing Research Monte Carlo Study Reconstruction Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., Schuchard-Ficher, Chr., Weiber, R. (1987): Multivariate Analysemethoden, 4. ed., Berlin-Heidelberg-New York-Paris-TokioGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentier, P.M. (1986): Structural Equation Modeling with EQS on a Microcomputer. In: Gaul, W. and Schader, M. (eds.): Classification as a Tool of Research, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Förster, F., Fritz, W., Silberer, G., Raffée, H. (1984): Der LISREL-Ansatz der Kausalanalyse und seine Bedeutung für die Marketingforschung. In: ZfB 54 (1984), 346–367Google Scholar
  4. Gaul, W., Förster, F., Schiller, K. (1986): Typologisierung deutscher Marktforschungsinstitute. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. In: Marketing ZFP 3, August 1986, 163–172Google Scholar
  5. Hartung, J., Elpelt, B. (1986): Multivariate Statistik, 2. ed., München-WienGoogle Scholar
  6. Hildebrandt, L., Trommsdorff, V. (1983): Konfirmatorische Analysen in der empirischen Forschung. In: Forschungsgruppe Konsum und Verhalten (eds.): Innovative Marktforschung, Würzburg-WienGoogle Scholar
  7. Hodapp, V. (1984): Analyse linearer Kausalmodelle, Bern-Stuttgart-TorontoGoogle Scholar
  8. Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (1988): LISREL VII: A Guide to the Program and Applications, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawley, D.N., Maxwell, A.E. (1971): Factor analysis as a statistical method, 2. ed., LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Norusis, M. (1988): SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics V2.0, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfeifer, A., Schmidt, P. (1987): LISREL: Die Analyse komplexer Strukturgleichungsmodelle, Stuttgart-New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Schoenberg, R., Arminger, G. (1989): LINCS 2.0 Users Guide, RJS Software, KensingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Überla, K. (1977): Faktorenanalyse, reprint of the 2. ed., Berlin-Heidelberg-New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Benz
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich Angewandte Informatik und MathematikFachhochschule FuldaFuldaGermany

Personalised recommendations