Skip to main content

Application of Filters in Bioacoustics

  • Chapter

Abstract

One afternoon in 1981, the screen went blank on the laboratory’s real-time digital spectrograph, a recent technological advance at that time. The president and chief engineer of the company selling this spectrograph diagnosed the problem over the phone. “Oh, that’s just the filter board. What are you using the analyzer for? Bird song? For the frequency ranges of your signals you don’t really need the filters. Go ahead and bypass the filter board.” I was worried that an integral component of the machine was not working, but was uncertain about the function of the filter board. If the machine’s designer said the filter was unneccesary, then it must be. I removed the offending circuit board, bypassed the connection, and went back to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beecher MD (1988) Spectrographic analysis of animal vocalizations: implications of the “uncertainty principle”. Bioacoustics 1:187–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Marler P, Beeman K (1987) Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: An application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook EW, Miller GA (1992) Digital filtering: background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. Psychophysiology 29:350–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamming RW (1989) Digital filters. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydin S (1986) Adaptive filter theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller CH, Takahashi TT (1996) Responses to simulated echoes by neurons in the barn owl’s auditory map. J Comp Physiol A 178:499–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menne D (1989) Digital filters in auditory physiology. Bioacoustics 2:87–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Okanoya K, Dooling RJ (1987) Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. J Comp Physiol 101:7–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW (1989) Discrete-time signal processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns S, David R (1988) Signal processing algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom DC (1982) Factors to consider in recording avian sounds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Ouellet H (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. vol 1. Academic Press, New York, p 1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoddard, P.K. (1998). Application of Filters in Bioacoustics. In: Hopp, S.L., Owren, M.J., Evans, C.S. (eds) Animal Acoustic Communication. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76220-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76220-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76222-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76220-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics