Advertisement

The Epidemiology of Vascular Dementia

  • G. C. Román

Abstract

The first step in the methodology of modern epidemiology is the definition of the nature of the problem [5]. In the case of vascular dementia, both the definition of the epidemiologic case and the development of adequate diagnostic criteria have been extremely difficult. This is due to several factors: First, the clinical diagnosis of dementia is not a simple procedure since it is influenced by the confounding effect of cultural and educational factors which may mask early and mild cases. Furthermore, the diagnosis requires careful separation from delirium, depression, mental retardation, and psychiatric diseases, as well as from isolated cortical deficits such as aphasia, apraxia, or agnosia. Second, when the diagnosis of dementia is suspected, particularly in early cases, it usually needs confirmation by formal neuropsychologic testing. Third, once the diagnosis of dementia is confirmed, the possible causes — in particular treatable ones — should be investigated [12]. This is a long, complex, and usually unrewarding process which ends in most cases in the trifurcate, dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), vascular or multi-infarct dementia (MID), and mixed forms (MIX) resulting from the combination of DAT and MID. The main difficulty with this process of exclusion is that it is virtually impossible to determine if the vascular lesions are simply a marker for vascular dementia, coincidental lesions, the cause of the dementia, or a contributing factor.

Keywords

Single Photon Emission Compute Tomography Vascular Dementia White Matter Lesion Pseudobulbar Palsy Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boller F, Lopez OL, Moosay J (1989) Diagnosis of dementia: Clinicopathologic correlations. Neurology 39:76–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brun A, Englund E (1986) A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: A pathoanatomical study. Ann Neurol 19:253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandler JD, Chandler JE (1988) The prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders in a nursing home population. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1:71–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark EG (1955) Modern concepts of epidemiology. J Chronic Dis 2:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewey ME, Copeland JRM, Hofman A, editors (1990) Case Finding for Dementia in Epidemiological Studies. Institute of Human Ageing, Liverpool, (EURODEM Report 1)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erkinjuntti T, Haltia M, Palo J, Sulkava R, Paetau A (1988) Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vascular dementia: a prospective clinical and post-mortem neuropathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 51:1037–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hachinski VC (1990) The decline and resurgence of vascular dementia. Can Med Assoc J 142:107–111Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E et al. (1975) Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 32:632–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hagnell O, Lanke J, Rorsman B et al. (1981) Does the incidence of age psychosis decrease? A prospective, longitudinal study of complete population investigated during the 25-year period 1947–1972: The Lundby Study. Neuropsychobiology 7:201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jorm AF, Korten AE, Henderson AS (1987) The prevalence of dementia: a quantitative integration of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand 76:465–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loeb C, Gandolfo C (1983) Diagnostic evaluation of degenerative and vascular dementia. Stroke 14:399–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masdeu JC, Wolfson L, Lantos G et al. (1989) Brain white-matter changes in the elderly prone to falling. Arch Neurol 46:1292–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M et al. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34: 939–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mirson T, Hachinski V (1988) Epidemiology and classification of vascular and multi-infarct dementia. In Meyer JS et al. (ed): Vascular and multi-infarct dementia. Future, Mount Kisco, NY, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rocca WA, Hofman A, Amaducci L, for the EURODEM Prevalence Research Group (1990) The prevalence of dementia in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980–1990 findings. Ann Neurol 1991 (in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rocca WA, Bonaiuto S, Lippi A et al. (1990) Prevalence of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease and other dementing disorders: a door-to-door survey in Appignano, Macerata Province, Italy. Neurology 40:626–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roman GC (1987) Senile dementia of the Binswanger type: A vascular form of dementia in the elderly. JAMA 258:1782–1788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Román GC (1987) Cerebral congestion: a vanished disease. Arch Neurol 44:444–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Román GC (1990) The meaning of white matter lesions in the elderly. In: Hachinski VC (ed) Challenges in neurology. Davis (in press)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schoenberg BS, Anderson DW, Haerer AF (1985) Severe dementia: Prevalence and clinical features in a biracial US population. Arch Neurol 42:740–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schoenberg BS, Kokmen E, Okazaki H (1987) Alzheimer’s disease and other dementing illnesses in a defined United States population: Incidence rates and clinical features. Ann Neurol 22:724–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. Román
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroepidemiology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations