Skip to main content

Staging Extent in Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate: Efficacy Versus Economy

  • Conference paper
Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

The spectrum of diagnostic procedures for clinically defining the extent of incidentally discovered carcinoma of the prostate depends to a considerable degree on the individual treatment philosophy. For proponents of a more aggressive management who consider even patients with D1 lesions as candidates for radical surgery, staging efforts may be restricted to the exclusion of distant lesions. Those who favor a rather conservative line may need more information to exclude progressive disease particularly if immediate androgen deprivation would be initiated in this situation. It is obvious that there is no undisputed, simple, efficient, and cost-saving recommendation as to which diagnostic measures are to be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benson KH, Watson RA, Spring DB, Agee RE (1981) The value of computerized tomography in evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes. J Urol 126:63–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brendler CB, Cleeve LK, Anderson EE, Paulson DF (1980) Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: risk versus benefit. J Urol 124:849–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce AW, O’Cleireachain F, Morales A, Awad SA (1977) Carcinoma of the prostate: a critical look at staging. J Urol 117:319–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Donohue RE, Mani JH, Whitesel JA, Mohr S, Scanavino D, Augspurger RR, Biber RJ, Fauver HE, Wettlaufer JN, Pfister R (1982) Pelvic lymph node dissection. Urology 20:559–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler JE Jr, Torgerson L, McLeod DG, Stutzman RE (1981) Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: observations on the accuracy of staging with lymph node frozen sections. J Urol 126:618–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freiha FS, Pistenma DA, Bagshaw MA (1979) Pelvic lymphadenectomy for staging prostatic carcinoma: Is it always necessary? J Urol 122:176–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Golimbu M, Schinella R, Morales P, Kurusu S (1978) Differences in pathological characteristics and prognosis of clinical A2 prostatic cancer from A1 and B disease. J Urol 119:618–622

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Golimbu M, Morales P, Al-Askari S, Brown J. (1979) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic cancer. J Urol 121:617–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman IC, Carpiniello V, Greenberg SH, Malloy TR, Wein AJ (1980) Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the prostate. Review of 91 cases. J Urol 124:632–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine MS, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Mulhern CB Jr, Pollack HM, Wein A-J (1981) Detecting lymphatic metastases from prostatic carcinoma: superiority of CT. AJR 137:207–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG, Weisenburger T (1980) Pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 124:635–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lytton B, Collins JT, Weiss RM, Schiff M Jr, McGuire EJ, Livolsi V (1979) Results of biopsy after early stage prostatic cancer treatment by implantation of 125I seeds. J Urol 121:306–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin AP, Saltzstein SL, McCullough DL, Gittes RF (1976) Prostatic carcinoma: incidence and location of unsuspected lymphatic metastases. J Urol 115:89–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Middleton R (1978) Pelvic lymphadenectomy: recent results. Annual Meeting, American Urological Association, 21 May 1978

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicholson TC, Richie JP (1977) Pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage B1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: justified or not? J Urol 117:199–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulson DF, Uro-Oncology Research Group (1979) The impact of current staging procedures in assessing disease extent of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 121:300–302

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prout GR Jr, Heaney JA, Griffin PP, Daly JJ, Shipley WU (1980) Nodal involvement as a prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 124:226–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schaffer DL, Pendergrass HP (1976) Comparison of enzyme, clinical radiographic and radionuclide methods of detecting bone metastases from carcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 121:431–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stamey TA, Kabalin JN (1989) Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. I. Untreated patients. J Urol 141:1070–1075

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weinerman PM, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Pollack HM, Banner MP, Wein AJ (1983) Pelvic adenopathy from bladder and prostate carcinoma: detection by rapid sequence tomography. AJR 140:95–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whitehead ED, Huh SH, Garcia RL, Rao R, Leiter E (1981) Interstitial irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate with 125iodine and simultaneous extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in 32 patients: trials, tribulations and possible triumphs. J Urol 126:366–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zincke H, Farrow GM, Myers RP, Benson RC Jr, Furlow WL, Utz DC (1982) Relationship between grade and stage of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and regional pelvic lymph node metastases. J Urol 128:498–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ackermann, R. (1991). Staging Extent in Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate: Efficacy Versus Economy. In: Altwein, J.E., Faul, P., Schneider, W. (eds) Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76129-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76129-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76131-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-76129-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics