Destabilization and Aggregation in Turbulent Pipe Flow

  • Rudolf Klute

Abstract

The application of hydrolyzing aluminium and iron salts in chemical water and wastewater treatment requires a rapid and uniform distribution of the chemicals in the raw water. This can be attributed to the short reaction times involved in the formation of hydroxocomplex species and their adsorption onto the particle surface, which are in the range of 10-4-1 s. However, coagulation experiments in stirred continuous flow reactors do not allow defined reaction times on this order of magnitude to be adjusted. Therefore, a pipe flow reactor for particle destabilization and aggregation investigations has been constructed, permitting a minimum defined reaction time of 0.05 s. This plug flow type reactor has been used to investigate the destabilization kinetics of silica particles with aluminium and prepolymerized aluminium under controlled flow conditions during the very first reaction phase.

The results show that aluminium hydroxocomplex species with a maximum destabilization potential axe formed within an interval of less than 0.1 s. Increased reaction times result in the formation of hydrolysis species, characterized by a decreasing destabilization efficiency. After 6 s, the hydrolysis reaction is terminated and sweep coagulation is the dominating process. There are indications that pre-polymerized aluminium products are more stable after dosing and dilution than polymeric species of Al3+, formed during the hydrolysis reaction after dosing. The importance of high-intensity mixing during the destabilization phase is emphasized by these results. A comparison with data from technical scale plants leads to the conclusion that coagulation process efficiency can be improved with a proper design of the mixing device for the chemicals.

Keywords

Hydrolysis Phosphorus Filtration Hydroxide Sedimentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. [1]
    Levenspiel, O.: Chemical Reaction Engineering. Wiley, New York 1972Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hahn, H.H., Stumm, W The Rate-Determing Step. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 28 (1968) 134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Letterman, R.D., Quon, J.E., Gemmell, R.S.: Influence of Rapid-Mix Parameters on Flocculation. J. AWWA 65 (1973) 716–722Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Amirtharajah, A., Mills, K.M.: Rapid-Mix Design for Mechanisms of Alum Coagulation. J. AWWA 74 (1982) 210–216Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Klute, R., Dierschke, M.: Particle Destabilization in Pipe Flow: The Effect of Aluminium Hydrolysis Species. Z. Wasser-Abwasser-Forschung (1990) (in press)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Klute, R.: Rapid Mixing in Coagulation Processes - Design Criteria. In: Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment (A. Grohmann, H.H. Hahn, R. Klute (eds.)). Fischer, Stuttgart/New York 1985Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dittmann, W., Grohmann, A., Klute, R., Wiesmann, U.: Mixing Systems for Pipe Reactors in Water Treatment. Vom Wasser 70 (1988) 129–140Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hahn, H.H., Stumm, W.: Coagulation by Al(III): The Role of Adsorption of Hydrolyzed Aluminium in the Kinetics of Coagulation. Advances in Chemistry Series No. 79, Adsorption from Aqueous Solution (1968) 91–111Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Amirtharajah, A.: Design of Rapid-Mix Units. In: Water Treatment Plant Design for the Practising Engineer (R.L. Sanks (ed.)). Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1978Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dittmann, W., Grohmann, A., Klute, R., Wiesmann, U.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Einfluß von Mischprozessen auf die Wirkung von Flok- kungsmitteln bei der Wasseraufbereitung. Report BMFT 02-WT 438, Federal Ministry of Research, Bonn, West-Germany (1989)Google Scholar
  11. [11] O’Melia, C.R., Stumm, W.: Aggregation of Silica Dispersion by Iron(III).
    J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 23 (1967) 437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    ∅degaard, H., Fettig, J., Ratnaweera, H.: Coagulation with Prepolymerized Metal Salts. In: Proceedings of the 4th Gothenburg Symposium (H.H. Hahn, R. Klute (eds.)). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1990Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Seyfried, A.: (Unpublished data, 1990)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ventresque, C., Bablon, G.: New Coagulant Injection Process. In: Pretreatment in Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment (H.H. Hahn, R. Klute, (eds.)). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1988Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Chao, J.-L., Stone, B.G.: Initial Mixing by Jet Injection Blending. J. AWWA 71 (1979) 570–573Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Grohmann, A., Hässelbarth, U., Langer, W.: Hochgeschwindigkeitsinjektion bei der Wasseraufbereitung. Vom Wasser 49 (1977) 267–275Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Stendahl, K.: Colloid Destabilization in Practice. In: Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment (A. Grohmann, H.H. Hahn, R. Klute (eds.)). Fischer, Stuttgart/New York 1985Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Bratby, J.: Coagulation and Flocculation. Uplands Press Ltd., Croydon, England, 1980Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Faison, T.K., Davis, J.C., Achenbach, P.R.: Performance of Square-Edge Orifices and Orifice-Target Combination as Air Mixers. National Bureau of Standards, Building Science Series 12, Washington, 1967Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Vrale, L., Jorden, R.M.: Rapid Mixing in Water Treatment. J. AWWA 63 (1971) 52–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudolf Klute
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für SiedlungswasserwirtschaftUniversität KarlsruheKarlsruhe 1West Germany

Personalised recommendations