The Case for Quality of Life Assessment in Glaucoma Clinical Trials
The pros and cons of medical or surgical therapy are commonly compared by assessing the risks and benefits of each therapeutic approach. This concept emphasizes that physicians and patients need to consider that every form of therapeutic intervention, while undertaken to make things better, could, in fact, in some ways make them worse. Ophthalmologists discuss the risk/benefit concept when, for example, they discuss cataract surgery with their patients. The patient weighs the potential benefits of improved vision (and improved quality of life) against the risks of surgical complications which could make their vision (and quality of life) worse.
KeywordsMedical Therapy Intraocular Pressure Glaucoma Patient Filtration Surgery Quality Oflife
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bernth-Peterson P (1982) Outcome of cataract surgery. IV. socio-economic aspects. Acta Ophthalmol 60:461–468Google Scholar
- Hollenberg NK (1987) Initial therapy in hypertension: quality of life considerations. J Hypertension 5 (Suppl 1): S3-S7Google Scholar
- Shipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M (1984) Measuring the qualify of life of cancer patients: the functional living index — cancer. J Clin Oncol 2:472–483Google Scholar