Dense FDM Coherent Optical Switching System
We report the results obtained with a dense FDM coherent optical star network operated as a computer-controlled high capacity switch. The system provides switching connectivity between the input signals modulating the transmitting lasers and the output signals demodulated by optical receivers. It consists of eight FSK-modulated channels multiplexed by a 16×16 optical star coupler. Six of these channels arc generated by individual digitally tuned optical frequency synthesizers. The frequency of these six channels can be randomly selected from a set of equi-spaced frequencies (2.2 GHz). Two of the sixteen multi-channel signals, coming out of the star coupler, arc demultiplexed by their individual digitally tuned heterodyne receivers. Each receiver can randomly select a desired channel by computer command. Switching is performed by rerouting, from the computer keyboard, the transmitted channels between the receivers. The receivers can identify missing channels. More importantly, the digital tuning of the frequency synthesizers and of the receivers is insensitive to variation of the frequency-tuning current relationship of the lasers.
KeywordsTuning Range Optical Frequency Channel Selection Distribute Bragg Reflector Optical Receiver
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.M. Fujiwara, N. Shimosaka, M. Nishio, S. Susuki, S. Yamazaki, S. Murata and K. Kaede, “A Coherent Photonic Wavelength - Division Switching Systems for Broadband Networks”, ECOC’88 11–15 Sept. 1988, Brighton Center, Brighton, U.K.Google Scholar
- 2.N. Nishio, T. Numai, S. Suzuki, M. Fujiwara, M. Iloh and S. Murata, “Eight-Channel Wavelength-Division Switching Experiment Using Wide-Tuning-Range DFB LD Filters”, OFC’89 6–9 Feb. 1989, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
- 3.K. Y. Eng and M. Santoro, “Multi-Gb/s Optical Cross-connect Switch Architectures: TDM versus FDM Techniques”, Proceeding IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp 999–1003 Dallas, Texas November 27–30, 1989.Google Scholar
- 9.B. Glance, T. L. Koch, O. Scaramucci, K. C. Reichmann, L. D. Tzeng, U. Koren and C. A. Burrus, “Densely Spaced DFM Coherent System With Near Quantum-Limited Sensitivity and Computer - Controlled Random Access Channel Selection”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 14, pp. 883–885, July 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.M. Okai, N. Chinonc and T. Harada “Narrow Linewidth Tunable Multiple Quantum Well x/y Shifted Distributed Feedback Laser”, Technical Digest OFC’90, San Francisco, 22–26 Jan. 1990.Google Scholar
- 11.B. Glance, O. Scaramucci, T. L. Koch and J. Stone, “Optical Frequency Synthesizer”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 17, Aug. 1989.Google Scholar
- 12.B. Glance and O. Scaramucci, “Optical Heterodyne Receiver Providing Random Channel Selection”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 19, Sept. 1989.Google Scholar
- 13.J. Stone, “Optical-fibre Fabry-Perot Interferometer With Finesse of 300”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 21, No. 11, May 1985.Google Scholar
- 14.B. Glance, J. Stone, K. J. Pollock, P. J. Fitzgerald, C. A. Burrus, B. L. Kasper and L. W. Stulz, “Densely Spaced FDM Coherent Star Network With Optical Signals Confined to Equally Spaced Frequencies”, Journal of Lightwave Techn., Vol. 16, No. 11, November 1988.Google Scholar