Dense FDM Coherent Optical Switching System

  • B. Glance
  • O. Scaramucci
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Electronics and Photonics book series (SSEP, volume 29)


We report the results obtained with a dense FDM coherent optical star network operated as a computer-controlled high capacity switch. The system provides switching connectivity between the input signals modulating the transmitting lasers and the output signals demodulated by optical receivers. It consists of eight FSK-modulated channels multiplexed by a 16×16 optical star coupler. Six of these channels arc generated by individual digitally tuned optical frequency synthesizers. The frequency of these six channels can be randomly selected from a set of equi-spaced frequencies (2.2 GHz). Two of the sixteen multi-channel signals, coming out of the star coupler, arc demultiplexed by their individual digitally tuned heterodyne receivers. Each receiver can randomly select a desired channel by computer command. Switching is performed by rerouting, from the computer keyboard, the transmitted channels between the receivers. The receivers can identify missing channels. More importantly, the digital tuning of the frequency synthesizers and of the receivers is insensitive to variation of the frequency-tuning current relationship of the lasers.


Tuning Range Optical Frequency Channel Selection Distribute Bragg Reflector Optical Receiver 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Fujiwara, N. Shimosaka, M. Nishio, S. Susuki, S. Yamazaki, S. Murata and K. Kaede, “A Coherent Photonic Wavelength - Division Switching Systems for Broadband Networks”, ECOC’88 11–15 Sept. 1988, Brighton Center, Brighton, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Nishio, T. Numai, S. Suzuki, M. Fujiwara, M. Iloh and S. Murata, “Eight-Channel Wavelength-Division Switching Experiment Using Wide-Tuning-Range DFB LD Filters”, OFC’89 6–9 Feb. 1989, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Y. Eng and M. Santoro, “Multi-Gb/s Optical Cross-connect Switch Architectures: TDM versus FDM Techniques”, Proceeding IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp 999–1003 Dallas, Texas November 27–30, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Glance, L. D. Tzeng, T. L. Koch, O. Scaramucci, K. C. Reichmann and U. Koren, “High- Performance Coherent Optical Communication System” Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 14 pp. 932–933, July 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Murata, I. Mito and K. Kobayashi, “Over 720 GHz (5·8 nm) Frequency Tuning by a 1·5 μim DBR Laser With Phase and Bragg Wavelength Control Regions”, Electron. Lett, 1987, 23, pp. 403–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Kotaki, M. Matsuda, M. Yano, H. Ishikawa and H. Imai, “1·55 μm Wavelength Tunable FBH-DBR Laser”, ibid., 1987, 23 pp. 325–327.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. L. Koch, U. Koren, R. P. Gnall, C. A. Burrus and B. I. Miller, “Continuously Tunable 1·5 μm Multiplc-Quantum-Well InGaAs/InGaAsP Distributed-Bragg-Reflcctor Lasers,” Electron. Lett. 24, 1431 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. L. Koch, U. Koren and B. I. Miller, “High Performance Tunable 1.5 p.m InGaAs/InGaAsP Multiple Quantum Well Distributed Bragg Reflector Lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1036 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Glance, T. L. Koch, O. Scaramucci, K. C. Reichmann, L. D. Tzeng, U. Koren and C. A. Burrus, “Densely Spaced DFM Coherent System With Near Quantum-Limited Sensitivity and Computer - Controlled Random Access Channel Selection”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 14, pp. 883–885, July 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Okai, N. Chinonc and T. Harada “Narrow Linewidth Tunable Multiple Quantum Well x/y Shifted Distributed Feedback Laser”, Technical Digest OFC’90, San Francisco, 22–26 Jan. 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Glance, O. Scaramucci, T. L. Koch and J. Stone, “Optical Frequency Synthesizer”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 17, Aug. 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Glance and O. Scaramucci, “Optical Heterodyne Receiver Providing Random Channel Selection”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 25, No. 19, Sept. 1989.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Stone, “Optical-fibre Fabry-Perot Interferometer With Finesse of 300”, Elect. Letters, Vol. 21, No. 11, May 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Glance, J. Stone, K. J. Pollock, P. J. Fitzgerald, C. A. Burrus, B. L. Kasper and L. W. Stulz, “Densely Spaced FDM Coherent Star Network With Optical Signals Confined to Equally Spaced Frequencies”, Journal of Lightwave Techn., Vol. 16, No. 11, November 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Glance
    • 1
  • O. Scaramucci
    • 1
  1. 1.Crawford Hill LaboratoryAT & T Bell LaboratoriesHolmdelUSA

Personalised recommendations