Skip to main content

The Literature on Joseph A. Schumpeter. A Historical Assessment (1907–1989)

  • Chapter
Joseph Alois SCHUMPETER
  • 127 Accesses

Abstract

This essay follows the evolution of the sum total of the literature on Joseph A. Schumpeter — it covers the last eighty years. A brief quantitative analysis of the data collected for this catalogue opens the discussion. The major historiographic trends concerning Schumpeter and the various general interpretations of his works are then mapped out. Lastly, a broad review of the critical literature on Schumpeter’s contributions to various specific fields of interest and research is presented according to a division into several categories considered the most significant. Within each category, trends in scholarly interest in specific themes under discussion are analyzed.

I would like to thank E. Addis, P.F. Asso, R. Faucci and G. Pavanelli for having kindly looked over an earlier draft of this essay and provided useful suggestions and ideas. My special thanks go out to D. Giva who took the time to discuss the structure and content of this essay at length with me and whose collaboration in classifying the bibliographical entries was extremely valuable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • DEMARIA, G. Le “forme della conoscenza in Schumpeter” (1951, 291).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. SPIETHOFF, “Joseph Schumpeter: In Memoriam” (1949, 224).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. WERNER, “Das Verhaeltnis von Theorie und Geschichte bei Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1958, 558).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.-H. BOUSQUET, “Les tendances nouvelles de-l’école autrichienne” (1924, 55).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. HABERLER, “Joseph Alois Schumpeter: 1883–1950” (1950, 250).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. BAYER, “J. Schumpeter et l’école économique autrichienne” (1951, 283).

    Google Scholar 

  • GATTEI, G, “Schumpeter e reterno ritorno dell’accumulazione originaria” (1970, 778).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEEZY, P.M, “Professor Schumpeter’s Theory of Innovation” (1943, 179).

    Google Scholar 

  • USHER, A.P, “Historical Implications of the Theory of Economic Development” (1951, 340).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEEZY, P.M, “Introduction.” In J.A. Schumpeter. Imperialism and Social Classes (1951, 333).

    Google Scholar 

  • WEILLER, J, “L’économie sociologique de Schumpeter” (1951, 341).

    Google Scholar 

  • EISERMANN, G, “Joseph Schumpeter als Soziologe” (1965, 689).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Schumpeter as a Teacher and Economic Theorist” (1951, 326).

    Google Scholar 

  • TINBERGEN, J, “Schumpeter and Quantitative Research in Economics” (1951, 337).

    Google Scholar 

  • FELS, R, “Introduction.” In J.A. Schumpeter. Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (1964, 675).

    Google Scholar 

  • COZZI, T. Teoria dello sviluppo economico (1972, 836).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOSLABINI, P, “Le problème des cycles économiques de longue durée” (1950, 270).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENCE, R.V. and DOODY, F.S. The Schumpeterian System (1950, 238).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERROUX, F, “Les trois analyses de l’évolution et la recherche d’une dynamique totale chez Joseph Schumpeter” (1951, 322).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARRINER, D, “Schumpeter and the Conception of Static Equilibrium” (1931, 96).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHUMPETER, J.A, “Eine “dynamische” Theorie des Kapitalzinses: Eine Entgegnung” (1913, S.74).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOEHM-BAWERK von, E, “Eine dynamische Theorie des Kapitalzinses: Schlussbemerkungen” (1913, 23).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURCHARDT, F. Beitraege zum Problem der Statik bei Schumpeter (1927, 70).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBBINS, L, “On a Certain Ambiguity in the Conception of Stationary Equilibrium” (1930, 91).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Introduzione.” (In J. A. Schumpeter. processo capitalistico. Cicli economici (1977, 955).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOOPMANS, J.G, “De Zin der Bankpolitiek: Schumpeter contra Keynes” (1925, 64).

    Google Scholar 

  • BENNION, E.G, “Unemployment in the Theories of Schumpeter and Keynes” (1943, 167).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M. (Ed. by) Moneta e produzione. Torino: Einaudi, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Il trattato sulla moneta di J.A. Schumpeter” (1978, 971).

    Google Scholar 

  • VICARELLI, F, “Introduzione.” (In Capitale industriale e capitale finanziario. Il caso italiano (1979, 1024).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARBURTON, C, “Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System” (1953, 401).

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMABE, N, “Schumpeter taikei ni okeru kahei to keizai hendo” (1954, 437).

    Google Scholar 

  • EGIDI, M. Schumpeter. Lo sviluppo come trasformazione morfologica (1981, 1074).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEK, R.L, “Is Economics Biased? A Heretical View of a Leading Thesis in Schumpeter’s History” (1957, 528).

    Google Scholar 

  • GIVA, D, “Storia dell’analisi economica e teoria dello sviluppo. Note su Schumpeter” (1977, 953).

    Google Scholar 

  • BATSON, H, “Schumpeter, J.A.” (1930, 87).

    Google Scholar 

  • SPIETHOFF, A, “Josef Schumpeter: In Memoriam” (1949, 224).

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERLER, G, “Joseph Alois Schumpeter: 1883–1950” (1950, 250).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEONTIEF, W, “Joseph A. Schumpeter: 1883–1950” (1950, 256).

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITHIES, A, “Memorial: Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883–1950” (1950, 268).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUSQUET, G.-H, “Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1883–1950” (1950, 235).

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGENSTERN, O, “Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1883–1950” (1951, 319).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Schumpeter as a Teacher and Economic Theorist” (1951, 326).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEIMANN, E, “Joseph Schumpeter” (1950, 251).

    Google Scholar 

  • LACHMANN, L.M, “Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1883–1950” (1950, 253).

    Google Scholar 

  • TOBATA, S, “Schumpeter kyojuyuku” (1950, 273).

    Google Scholar 

  • COLE, A.H, “Joseph Schumpeter and the Research Center in Entrepreneurial History” (1950, 239).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYMANS, A, “Le “Research Center in Entrepreneurial History’””(1950, 272).

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERLER, G, “Schumpeter, Ministre des Finances: 15 mars-17 octobre 1919” (1950, 249).

    Google Scholar 

  • FRISCH, R, “Quelques souvenirs personnels sur un grand homme” (1950, 246).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, E, “Schumpeter tei que je l’ai connu” (1950, 267). T

    Google Scholar 

  • RIFFIN, R, “Schumpeter, souvenirs d’un étudiant” (1950, 275).

    Google Scholar 

  • TRITSCH, W, “Schumpeter avant 1925 livré au hasard de ma mémoire” (1953, 399).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOODY, E, “Bibliography of the Writings of Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (1950, 234).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHAEDER, R, “Schumpeter Joseph A.” (1956, 509).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERLIN, E.H, “Schumpeter, Joseph Alois” (1962, 647).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Schumpeter, Joseph A.” (1968, 760).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (1974, 899).

    Google Scholar 

  • PAGANI, A, “II “Center in Entrepreneurial History” e la teoria schumpeteriana dell’innovazione” (1963, 667).

    Google Scholar 

  • TSURU, S, “Schumpeter” (1964, 686).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Memories” (1969, 776).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Joseph Schumpeter” (1970, 799).

    Google Scholar 

  • MANN, F.K, “Zu Schumpeters Leben und Werk” (1971–1972, 823).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLSON, V, “The Education of an Economist Before the Great Depression. Harvard“s Economics Department in the 1920”s” (1968, 749).

    Google Scholar 

  • ITO, M, “Schumpeter no shosetsu” (1968, 753)

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, E. Joseph A. Schumpeter: Leben und Werk eines grossen Sozialoekonomen (1970, 801).

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSTON, W.M. The Austrian Mind. An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938 (1972, 843).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNARD, M. Banques et banquiers en Autriche au debut du 20e siècle (1976, 923).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEISSNER, F, “The Schumpeters and Industrialization of Trest” (1979, 1013).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIONOYA, Y, “The Schumpeter Family in Trest.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 30, 1989, No. 2, 157–166, which the author kindly forworded me when this catalog is already sent to print.

    Google Scholar 

  • VEROSTA, S, “Josef Schumpeter gegen das Zollbuendnis der Donaumonarchie mit Deutschland und gegen die Anschlusspolitik Otto Bauers, 1916–1919” (1976, 941).

    Google Scholar 

  • FETTER, F.W, “An Early Memory of Joseph Schumpeter” (1974, 888).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter chosaku mokuroku” (1976, 929).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter chosaku mokuroku. Dai 3 han” (1987, 1725).

    Google Scholar 

  • AUGELLO, M.M, “La fortuna critica di Schumpeter: Un inventario bibliografico, 1907–1983” (1984, 1366).

    Google Scholar 

  • AUGELLO, M.M, “Joseph A. Schumpeter nella letteratura economica internazionale” (1985, 1507).

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENSON, M.I. Joseph Alois Schumpeter. A Bibliography, 1905–1984 (1985, 1599).

    Google Scholar 

  • REALFONZO, R, “Una “bibliografìa ragionata” per lo studio dell’influenza di Schumpeter sul pensiero economico italiano (1907–1939)” (1989, 1899).

    Google Scholar 

  • JESSUA, C, “Schumpeter (Joseph Alois) 1883–1950” (1979, 1005).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E, “Schumpeter Joseph Alois (1883–1950)” (1979, 1010).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A, “Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1883–1950)” (1987, 1718).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIDL, C, “J.A. Schumpeter” (1989, 1901).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUSQUET, G.-H, “Un week-end chez I. Fisher en compagnie de J. Schumpeter” (1981, 1070).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUSQUET, G.-H, “Souvenirs et réflexions sur Schumpeter, 1883–1950” (1982, 1111).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M, “Schumpeter: L’uomo che ho conosciuto” (1983, 1240).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M. — MINSKY, H.P. and SYLOS LABINI, P, “Intervista su Schumpeter” (1987, 1713–1737–1760).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E, “Joseph A. Schumpeter as Minister of Finance of the First Republic of Austria, March 1919-October 1919” (1982, 1144).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE VECCHI, N, “Scarsità in inflazione. Ritratto di un economista da Ministro delle Finanze” (1983, 1210).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Schumpeter und die deutschen und oesterreichischen Sozialisierungsversuche von 1918/19. Festvortrag” (1984, 1481).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F. and SEIDL, C, “Einleitung: Schumpeters politische und wirtschaftspolitische Schriften” (1985, 1600).

    Google Scholar 

  • STREISSLER, E, “Schumpeter’s Vienna and the Role of Credit in Innovation” (1982, 1161).

    Google Scholar 

  • PIERA LABRA, J.A, “Viena en tiempos de Schumpeter” (1983, 1295).

    Google Scholar 

  • GUIDI, M.E.L, “Schumpeter a Vienna: La lettura di Marx” (1984, 1400).

    Google Scholar 

  • MIZUTA, H, “Wien no tasogare: J.A. Schumpeter” (1984, 1438).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E, “Persoenliche Erinnerungen an Joseph A. Schumpeter als akademischen Lehrer” (1983, 1275).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIDL, C, “Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Character, Life, and Particulars of his Graz Period” (1984, 1469).

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON, E.S, “The Harvard Department of Economics from the Beginning of World War II” (1982, 1146).

    Google Scholar 

  • STALEY, C.E, “Schumpeter’s 1947 Course in the History of Economic Thought” (1983, 1328).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOSLABINI, P, “Il mio professore Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (1983, 1336).

    Google Scholar 

  • DATE, K, “Schumpeter to Thomas Mann” (1983, 1209).

    Google Scholar 

  • GALLEGATI, M, “Materiali per una storia della “Nuova Collana di Economisti”: Lettere di italiani a Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1931–1949” (1983, 1236).

    Google Scholar 

  • YAGI, K, “Hilferding to Schumpeter: Chuo sairyo no sedai no bunki to kosaku” (1983, 1352).

    Google Scholar 

  • TRITSCH, W, “A Conversation Between Joseph Schumpeter and Max Weber” (1985, 1603).

    Google Scholar 

  • DATE, K, “Schumpeter to saisho no fujin” (1983, 1208)

    Google Scholar 

  • ALLEN, L.R. The Life and Work of Joseph Schumpeter (1989, 1860).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEDBERG, R, “Introductv.” In J.A. Schumpeter. The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism (1989, 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • RICCI, U, “Rassegna del movimento scientifico. Economia: J.A.S., Ueber die mathematische Methode der theoretischen Oekonomie” (1907, 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • SPANN, O, “Die mechanisch-mathematische Analogie in der Volkswirtschaftslehre” (1910, 14).

    Google Scholar 

  • WIESER von, F, “Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationaloekonomie: Kritische Glossen” (1911, 17).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAISER, R. Zur Kritik der metodisehen Ansichten Joseph Schumpeters (1925, 63).

    Google Scholar 

  • HONEGGER, H, “Zur Krisis der statischenationaloekonomik” (1924, 57).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKASHIMA, Z, “Schumpeter no keizai seigaku” (1926, 66).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURCHARDT, F. Beitraege zum Problem der Statik bei Schumpeter (1927, 70).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBBINS, L, “On a Certain Ambiguity in the Conception of Stationary Equilibrium” (1930, 91).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARRINER, D, “Schumpeter and the Conception of Static Equilibrium” (1931, 96).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOHN-RETHEL, A. Von der Analytik des Wirtschaftens zur Theorie der Volkswirtschaft. Methodologische Untersuchung mit besonderem Bezug auf die Theorie Schumpeters (1936, 122).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARIA, G, “Saggio sugli studi di dinamica economica” (1930, 89).

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEWE, A. Economics and Sociology: A Plea for Co-operation in the Social Sciences (1935, 116).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERROUX, F, “I concetti di statica e dinamica secondo Giuseppe Schumpeter” (1935, 119).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Dynamics, Statics and the Stationary State” (1943, 177).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAMURA, M, “Keizaigaku ni okeru jittai gainen to kankei gainen: Marx to Schumpeter” (1948, 209).

    Google Scholar 

  • AOYAMA, H, “Shakai kagaku teki ninshiki no kyakkansei to sono jisshitsu teki joken” (1949, 211).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAWASAKI, M, “Kagaku no kaikyusei to sinrisei” (1949, 218).

    Google Scholar 

  • KONDO, Y, “Riron to jissen tono renkan” (1949, 219).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARIA, G, “Le forme della conoscenza in Schumpeter” (1951, 291).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACHLUP, F, “Schumpeter’s Economic Methodology” (1951, 312).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHABERT, A, “Schumpeter et la méthode économique” (1950, 237).

    Google Scholar 

  • TINBERGEN, J, “Schumpeter and Quantitative Research in Economics” (1951, 337).

    Google Scholar 

  • WATERS, W.R. Entrepreneurship, Dualism and Causality: An Appreciation of the Work of Joseph A. Schumpeter (1953, 402).

    Google Scholar 

  • MUKERJI, D.P, “Rationality in Economic Science and the Contributions of Robbins, Keynes, Marx and Schumpeter” (1955, 463).

    Google Scholar 

  • STARK, W, “Joseph Schumpeters Umwertung der Werte. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit seiner History of Economic Analysis” (1955, 475).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEK, R.L, “Is Economics Biased? A Heretical View of a Leading Thesis in Schumpeter’s History” (1957 528).

    Google Scholar 

  • AUFRICHT, H, “The Methodology of Schumpeter’s History of Economic Analysis” (1958, 539).

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLFSON, R.J, “The Economic Dynamics of Joseph Schumpeter” (1958, 559).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACHLUP, F, “Static and Dynamics: Kaleidoscopic Words” (1959, 572).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAMANOI, Y. (Ed.)Schumpeter. Shakai Kagaku no Kako to Mirai (1972, 858).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIES, M.R, “J.A. Schumpeter and the Methodology of the Social Sciences” (1972, 837).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Shakai kagaku toriwake keizaigaku no hatten ni tsuite: Schumpeter no shosetsu wo chushin to shite” (1980, 1041).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEHNIS, F. Der Beitrag des spaeten Schumpeter zur Konjunkturforschung. Interpretation und methodologische Wuerdigung der “Business Cycles” (1960, 606)

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEK, R.L, “Economics and Ideology” (1967, 737).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAWATA, T, “Gakusetsu narabini haho: J.A. Schumpeter” (1969, 771).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEDOW, P. Conceptual and Methodological Problems in Applying Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development to Non-Market Economies (I960, 611).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE KLERCK, W, “De Wetenschappelijkheid van Schumpeters theorie over de essentie en de werking van de kapitalistische economie” (1970, 784).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARPREAU, R, “De wetenschappelijkheid van Schumpeters theorie. Naschrift” (1970, 783).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE KLERCK, W, “De Wetenschappelijkheid van Schumpeters theorie. Repliek op een naschrift” (1970, 785).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Hoho ronso” to Weber, “Schumpeter no hohoron teki kosatsu” (1970, 808).

    Google Scholar 

  • GIVA, D, “Storia dell’analisi economica e teoria dello sviluppo. Note su Schumpeter” (1977, 953).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Hoho ronso to shakai kagaku no hatten: G. Schmoller to J. Schumpeter” (1979, 1007).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLTERER, J, “Natural Law and Economics: Reflections on Desan, Rahner and Schumpeter” (1976, 940).

    Google Scholar 

  • BEACH, E.F, “A Modified Schumpeterian Process” (1981, 1067).

    Google Scholar 

  • XENOS, N, “Democracy as Method: Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1981, 1105).

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, E.E. and CHAPMAN FINDLAY, M, “A Reconsideration of the Rationality Postulate: “Right Hemisphere Thinking” in Economics” (1981, 1104).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEINE, W. Methodologischer Individualismus. Zur geschichtsphilosophischen Begruendung eines sozialwissenschaftlichen Konzeptes. C. Meriger, J.A. Schumpeter, M. Weber, F.A. v. Hayek, K.R. Popper (1983, 1251).

    Google Scholar 

  • BARRERE, A, “Keynes y Schumpeter, o la heterodoxia de los fundamentos analíticos” (1983, 1186).

    Google Scholar 

  • KREGEL, J.A, “Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes: Tre discepoli ortodossi di A. Smith” (1983, 1269)

    Google Scholar 

  • EGIDI, M, “Forme della razionalità e fondamenti macroeconomici della microeconomia nell’analisi schumpeteriana” (1982, 1122).

    Google Scholar 

  • CALZONI, G, “Introduzione.” In J.A. Schumpeter. L’essenza e i principi dell’economia teorica (1982, 1115).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEILBRONER, R.L, “Economics and Political Economy: Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter” (1984, 1406).

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMON, H.A, “On the Behavioral and Rational Foundation of Economic Dynamics” (1984, 1475).

    Google Scholar 

  • ARENA, R, “Rationalité microéconomique et circulation macroéconomique: Keynes et Schumpeter” (1985, 1506).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAHMEN, E, “Schumpeterian Dynamics: Some Methodological Notes” (1984, 1380).

    Google Scholar 

  • NAGATOMO, I, “Schumpeter no seizui wo ikasu keizai hatten ron no tame ni” (1984, 1440).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZINN, K.G. (Ed.) Beitraege zu Schumpeters Theorie der dynamischen Wirtschaft (1984, 1502).

    Google Scholar 

  • PANEDA FERNANDEZ, C, “La filosofia de la ciencia en la “Historia del analisis economico” de J.A. Schumpeter” (1983, 1293).

    Google Scholar 

  • BETHUNE, J.J., Joseph A. Schumpeter and His Methodology in His “History of Economic Analysis”: Do as I Do vs Do as I Say (1987, 1702).

    Google Scholar 

  • JENSEN, H.E, “New Lights on J.A. Schumpeter’s Theory of the History of Economics” (1987, 1721).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAGUEUX, M, “Hétérodoxie et scientificité chez Marx, Keynes et Schumpeter” (1985, 1561).

    Google Scholar 

  • LARCENEUX, A, “La genèse du concept de macroéconomie: Schumpeter, Marx, Keynes” (1985, 1563).

    Google Scholar 

  • SUFRIN, S.C, “Schumpeter — Walras and Pragmatism” (1987, 1759).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIONOYA, Y, “Schumpeter, Schmoller, Weber: Rekishi ninshiki no hoho ron” (1988, 1847).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, B.M, “Schumpeter’s Dynamic Economics” (1915, 32).

    Google Scholar 

  • OPPENHEIMER, F, “Das Bodenmonopol. (Zu Schumpeters “Das Grundprinzip der Verteilungslehre”)” (1917–1918, 38).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARKSEN, H. Der Streit ueber das Bodenmonopol zwischen Oppenheimer und Schumpeter vom Standpunkt der Liefmannschen Wirtschaftstheorie aus gesehen (1928, 79).

    Google Scholar 

  • ABEKEN, G. Der Kapitalprofit in der fortschreitenden Volkswirtschaft. (1927, 67).

    Google Scholar 

  • ENGLAENDER, O, “Kapitalzins und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Kritisches zur Lehre Joseph Schumpeters” (1928, 78).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARIA, G, “Studi sull’attività dell’imprenditore moderno” (1929, 86).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAEUSSERMANN, E. Der Unternehmer: Seine Funktion, seine Zielsetzung, sein Gewinn (1932, 100).

    Google Scholar 

  • HUG, R. Der Gedanke der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung bei Schumpeter und seine Aufnahme in der oekonomischen Theorie (1933, 104).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERROUX, F, “Introduction.” In J.A. Schumpeter. Théorie de l’évolution économique (1935, 118).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSIAUX, M, “La notion et le role du capital selon Schumpeter” (1937, 126).

    Google Scholar 

  • LANGE, O, “A note on Innovations” (1943, 173).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEEZY, P.M, “Professor Schumpeter’s Theory of Innovation” (1943, 179).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYMANS, A, “George(s) Tarde and Joseph A. Schumpeter: A Similar Vision” (1949, 225).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENCE, R.V. and DOODY, F.S. The Schumpeterian System (1950, 238).

    Google Scholar 

  • VARGA, E, “Schumpeter et le probleme du risque” (1950, 276).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLO, C.S, “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian Theory” (1951, 329).

    Google Scholar 

  • REDLICH, F, “Entrepreneurship in the Initial Stages of Industrialization” (1955, 466).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERLIN, E.H, “The Impact of Recent Monopoly Theory on the Schumpeterian System” (1951, 287).

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON, E.S, “Schumpeter on Monopoly and the Large Firm” (1951, 317).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, Y, “Schumpeter no dogaku teki dokusen riron” (1952, 377).

    Google Scholar 

  • FURTADO, C, “Formacao de Capital e Desenvolvimento Economico” (1952, 355).

    Google Scholar 

  • SINGER, H.W, “Obstacles to Economic Development” (1953, 398).

    Google Scholar 

  • BONNE, A, “Towards a Theory of Implanted Development in Underdeveloped Countries” (1956, 488).

    Google Scholar 

  • WALLICH, H.C, “Some Notes Towards a Theory of Derived. I Development” (1958, 557).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAKAMOTO, J, “Marx to Schumpeter no shihon riron” (1952, 370).

    Google Scholar 

  • BROZEN, Y, “Business Leadership and Technological Change” (1954, 411).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLIN, E.A, “Schumpeter’s Constructed Type: The Entrepreneur” (1956, 491).

    Google Scholar 

  • OKAZAKI, Y, “Dokusen to keizai hatten: Schumpeter no dogaku teki dokusen ron no ginmi” (1957, 532).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIBAYAMA, K, “Dokusen to keizai hatten: Schumpeter riron no hihan wo tegakari to shite” (1957, 534).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Schumpeter no dokusen ron ni tsuite” (1957, 537).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Schumpeter taikei to dokusen” (1957, 538). KONISHI, T, “Schumpeter no dokusen kigyo ron” (1959, 569).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIRASUGI, S, “Schumpeter no dokusen riron: Saikin ni okeru dokusen kotei no sho riron” (1959? 585).

    Google Scholar 

  • GEIGER, R. Die Entwicklungstendenzen des Kapitalismus bei Keynes, Schumpeter und Burnham (1959, 565).

    Google Scholar 

  • RUTTAN, V.W, “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change” (1959, 582).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACDONALD, R. A Comparison of the Theories of Entrepreneurial Expectations of Keynes and Schumpeter (1960, 608).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZALDUENDO, E.A, “El empresario en la obra de Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (I960, 619).

    Google Scholar 

  • AMES, E, “Research, Invention, Development and Innovation” (1961, 621).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIMMER, D, “Schumpeter and the Underdeveloped Countries” (1961, 637).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAUMAS, P.S, “Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development and Underdeveloped Countries” (1962, 652).

    Google Scholar 

  • WILES, R.C, “Schumpeter and Underdeveloped Countries: Comment” (1963, 671).

    Google Scholar 

  • WILES, R.C, “Professor Joseph Schumpeter and Underdevelopment” (1967, 746).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAKAMOTO, J, “Schumpeter taikei ni okeru kigyosha to kakushin ni kansuru ichi kosatsu: Max Weber no charisma teki shihaisha to no hikaku wo megutte” (1961, 640).

    Google Scholar 

  • VITELLO, V, “Teoria dello sviluppo capitalistico. L’analisi di J. Schumpeter: Analogie e differenze rilevanti con quella di K. Marx” (1963, 670).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYAMI, T, “Schumpeter to Keynes no rijun gainen no hikaku” (1965, 690).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKAHASHI, T, “Rijun gainen ni okeru Keynes to Schumpeter” (1966, 724).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARKHAM, J.W, “Market Structure, Business Conduct and Innovation” (1965, 700).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHERER, F.M, “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and the Output of Patented Inventions” (1965, 704).

    Google Scholar 

  • PHILLIPS, A, “Market Structure, Innovation and Investment” (1965, 702).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVKIN, R.M, “O nekotoryh prijomah apologetiki monopolij v rabotah J. Shumpetera” (1961, 638).

    Google Scholar 

  • KORCHEK, L, “Vlijanie J.A. Schumpeter na sovremennuju apologetick gosudarstvenno-monopolisticheskogo Kapitalizma”(1965, 696).

    Google Scholar 

  • EN DRESS, R. Unternehmer, Manager oder Staatsfunktionaer? Die Bedeutung der S chump et erschen Entwicklungsprognosen fuer die Gegenwart (1971, 787).

    Google Scholar 

  • HOJO, Y, “Kakushin ni okeru kigyosha kodo to shinyo sozo no yakuwari ni tsuite: Schumpeter no keizai hatten no riron wo chushin to shite” (1976, 926).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’NEILL, M.P. An Analysis of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: A Synthesis of Schumpeter, Hagen, and McClellan (1977, 962).

    Google Scholar 

  • GATTEI, G, “Schumpeter e l’eterno ritorno dell’accumulazione originaria” (1970, 788).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’DONNELL, L.A, “Rationalism, Capitalism and the Entrepreneur: The Views of Veblen and Schumpeter” (1973, 873).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Weber no charisma teki shidosha to Schumpeter no kigyosha” (1970, 807).

    Google Scholar 

  • CACCIARI, M, “All’origine del concetto di innovazione, Weber e Schumpeter” (1977, 946).

    Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, F.M. and TEMIN, P, “Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?” (1973, 867).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHERER, F.M, “Research and Development Returns to Scale and the Schumpeterian Hypothesis: a Comment” (1973, 879).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNULTY, P.J, “On Firm Size and Innovation in the Schumpeterian System” (1974, 896).

    Google Scholar 

  • RODRIGUEZ, C.A, “A Comment on Fisher and Temin on the Schumpeterian Hypothesis” (1979, 1019).

    Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, F.M. and TEMIN, P, “The Schumpeterian Hypothesis: Reply” (1979, 997).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSENBERG, J.B, “Research and Market Share: A Reappraisal of the Schumpeter Hypothesis” (1976–1977, 936).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter no keizai hatten ron to kigyosha” (1973, 870).

    Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R.R. and WINTER, S.G, “Simulation of Schumpeterian Competition” (1977, 961)

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTMAN, R.S. and VHEELER, D.R, “Schumpeterian Wages of Innovation and infrastructure Development in Great Britain and the United States: The Kondratieff Cycle Revisited” (1979, 1002).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALBACH, H, “Die Rolle des Schumpeter-Unternehmers heute. Mit besonderer Beruecksichtigung der Innovationsdynamik in der mittelstaendischen Industrie in Deutschland” (1984, 1362).

    Google Scholar 

  • KIYOKAWA, Y, “Entrepreneurship and Innovations in Japan. An Implication of the Experience of Technological Development in the Textile Industry” (1984, 1413).

    Google Scholar 

  • PATNAIK, P, “Market Question and Capitalist Development in India” (1984, 1450).

    Google Scholar 

  • CALZONI, G. and ROSSI, E. Credito, innovazioni e ciclo economico: Un modello di sviluppo schumpeteriano (1980, 1027).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARTIN, J.D. The Innovative Personality and the Process of Socioeconomic Change (1980, 1049).

    Google Scholar 

  • EGIDI, M. Schumpeter. Lo sviluppo come trasformazione morfologica (1981, 1074).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E, “Die Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung von Joseph A. Schumpeter in ihrer Beziehung zum Marxschen System” (1980, 1048).

    Google Scholar 

  • OKADA, H, “Gijutsu shinpo no ni keitai. Rijun ritsu teikaku keiko no hihan teki ginmi: Schumpeter vs Marx” (1980, 1053).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAKRAVARTY, S. Alternative Approaches to a Theory of Economic Growth: Marx, Marshall and Schumpeter (1982, 1117).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G, “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change” (1982, 1121).

    Google Scholar 

  • IWAI, K, “Schumpeter keizai dogaku (1): Kakushin to moho no dotai teki model” (1981, 1084).

    Google Scholar 

  • LUNN, J. “Research and Development and the Schumpeterian Hypothesis: Alternate Approach” (1982, 1142).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHN, M. and SCOTT, J.T, “Scale Economies in Research and Development: The Schumpeterian Hypothesis” (1981–1982, 1137).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAMIEN, M.I. and SCHWARTZ, N.L. Market Structure and Innovation (1982, 1136).

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C. The Economics of Industrial Innovation (1982, 1125).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Aspects of Schumpeter’s Theory of Evolution” (1982, 1159).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A, “Schumpeter’s Model of the Decay of Capitalism” (1982, 1132).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J.E, “Schumpeter and the Theory of Capitalist Economic Development” (1983, 1227).

    Google Scholar 

  • PIERA LABRA, J.A, “La inestabilidad del capitalismo segun Schumpeter” (1983, 1296).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M, “Credito e innovazione in Marx, Keynes e Schumpeter” (1983, 1281).

    Google Scholar 

  • GATTEI, G, “Lo “sciame” tra Keynes e Schumpeter” (1984, 1395).

    Google Scholar 

  • BLAUG, M, “Marx, Schumpeter y la Teoria del Empresario.” (1983, 1192).

    Google Scholar 

  • AONUMA, Y, “Keieisha kakumei to taisei mondai: Schumpeter to Marx, Keynes no shosetu ni kanren shite” (1984, 1365).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, J, “The Entrepreneur in Marx and Schumpeter. A Post-Keynesian Perspective” (1986, 1693).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEMMLER, W, “A propos de la concurrence, du surplus-profit temporain et du changement technique chez Marx and Schumpeter” (1984, 1471).

    Google Scholar 

  • KALMBACH, P. and KURZ, H.D, “Economic Dynamics and Innovation: Ricardo, Marx and Schumpeter on Technological Change and Unemployment” (1986, 1644).

    Google Scholar 

  • PUGNO, M, “Kaldor vs Schumpeter on Economic Growth and Structural Change” (1986, 1673).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMMOND, P.J, “Must Monopoly Power Accompany Innovation?” (1984, 1403).

    Google Scholar 

  • METCALFE, J.S, “Technological Innovation and the Competitive Process” (1986, 1663).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEINKNECHT, A, “Prosperity, Crisis and Innovation Patterns” (1984, 1414).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHERER, F.M. Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives (1984, 1463).

    Google Scholar 

  • CASTEJON MONTIJANO, R, “El empresario schumpeteriano y la historia empresarial” (1983, 1201).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWOBODA, P, “Schumpeter’s Entrepreneur in Modern Economic Theory” (1984, 1484).

    Google Scholar 

  • URSPRUNG, H.W, “Schumpeterian Entrepreneurs and Catastrophe Theory or a New Chapter to the Foundations of Economic Analysis” (1984, 1494).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRETON, Y, “La theorie schumpeterienne de l’entrepreneur ou le problème de la connaissance économique” (1984, 1374).

    Google Scholar 

  • DU ERR, E, “Der Schumpeter’sche Unternehmer in der Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung” (1987, 1707).

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, M.D, “Schumpeterian Perspectives on Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: A Commentary” (1987, 1761).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E, “Schumpeter’s Concept of the Entrepreneur” (1989, 1893).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRABOWSKI, H.G, “Vernon J.M.: Pioneers, Imitators, and Generics. A Simulation Model of Schumpeterian Competition” (1987, 1714).

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan (1987, 1710).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEINKNECHT, A. Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity. Schumpeter’s Long Cycle Reconsidered (1987, 1728).

    Google Scholar 

  • KATHURIA, S, “Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey of Empirical Studies of Schumpeterian Hypothesis” (1987, 1726).

    Google Scholar 

  • TILLY, R.H, “Financing Industrial Enterprise in Great Britain and Germany in the Nineteenth Century: Testing Grounds for Marxist and Schumpeterian Theories?” (1986, 1686).

    Google Scholar 

  • PAPAHRISTODOULOU, C. Inventions, Innovations and Economic Growth in Sweden: An Appraisal of the Schumpeterian Theory (1987, 1745).

    Google Scholar 

  • BIDKAR, I.R, “The Paradox of Indian Economic Development: A Schumpeterian Perspective” (1988, 1780).

    Google Scholar 

  • BREMS, H, SHAN, W., “Schumpeterian Sweden” (1989, 1869), Technological Change and Strategic Cooperation: Evidence from Commercialization of Biotechnology (1987, 1756).

    Google Scholar 

  • BROUWER, M.T, “A Schumpeterian Approach to Technical Innovation and Market Structures with an Application to Semi Conductors and Computers” (1988, 1783).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHADEAU, E, “Schumpeter, the State and the Capitalists. Entrepreneurship in the French Aircraft Industry, 1900–1980” (1988, 1786).

    Google Scholar 

  • HANUSCH, H. (Ed.). Evolutionary Economics. Applications of Schumpeter’s Ideas (1988, 1803).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELIASSON, G, “Schumpeterian Innovation, Market Structure, and the Stability of Industrial Development” (1988, 1792).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A, “Schumpeter and Technical Change” (1988, 1804).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHERER, F.M, “Enterprise Ownership and Managerial Behavior” (1988, 1840).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Development: Theory and Empirical Evidence” (1988, 1850).

    Google Scholar 

  • BROUWER, M.T. Market Structures and Economic Evolution: A Schumpeterian View (1989, 1870).

    Google Scholar 

  • OAKLEY, A. Schumpeter’s Theory of Capitalist Motion: A Critical Exposition and Re-assessment (1989, 1897).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOS LABINI, P. Nuove tecnologie e disoccupazione (1989, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  • TALELE, C.J, “Schumpeterian Financing of Economic Development” (1988, 1851).

    Google Scholar 

  • WELFENS, P.J.J, “Reale und Monetaere Faktoren in der Wirtschaftsentwicklung: Anmerkungen zu vernachlaessigten Aspekten von J.A. Schumpeters Wirtschaftstheorie” (1988, 1855).

    Google Scholar 

  • RAHMEYER, F, “An Evolutionary Approach to Inflation: Prices, Productivity, and Innovation” (1988, 1832).

    Google Scholar 

  • DELFAUD, P, “Schumpeter, Keynes et les nouveauxz ressorts du capitalisme” (1989, 1873).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A, “Schumpeter, Keynes and Technical Change” (1989, 1886).

    Google Scholar 

  • VITRY, D, “Schumpeter et Keynes: Deux conceptions du profit de la croissance” (1989, 1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOEHM-BAWERK von, E, “Eine “dynamische” Theorie des Kapitalzinses” (1913, S.74).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEL VECCHIO, G, “Lineamenti generali della teoria dell’interesse” (1915, 33).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDERSON, B.M. The Value of Money (1917, 37).

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERLER, G, “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Schumpeters Geldtheorie” (1924, 56).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOOPMANS, J.G, “De Zin der Bankpolitiek: Schumpeter contra Keynes” (1925, 64).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENS, H. Schumpeters Kapitalzinstheorie (1927, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • ENGLAENDER, O, “Kapitalzins und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. Kritisches zur Lehre Joseph Schumpeters” (1928, 78).

    Google Scholar 

  • OKAHASHI, T, “Schumpeter no kahei honshitsu kan to kahei suryo setsu” (1932, 101).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEINZE, G. Statische oder dynamische Zinstheorie? Versuch einer kritischen Beleuchtung der Casselschen und Schumpetersehen Zinstheorie (1928, 80). BARBARINO, O. Gibt es in der statischen Wirtschaft einen Kapitalzins? Kritisches und positives im Anschluss an Schumpeter (1934, 108).

    Google Scholar 

  • FANNO, M, “Cicli di produzione, eieli di credito e fluttuazioni industriali” (1931, 94).

    Google Scholar 

  • VITO, F, “II risparmio forzato e la teoria dei cicli economici” (1934, 111).

    Google Scholar 

  • GAMBINO, A, “La creazione dei crediti bancari” (1935, 113).

    Google Scholar 

  • WIEN-CLAUDI, F. Austrian Theories of Capital, Interest and the Trade-cycle (1936, 124).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIS, H.S. German Monetary Theory, 1905–1933 (1937, 127).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARGET, A.W. The Theory of Prices: A Re-Examination of the Central Problems of Monetary Theory (1938–1942, 161).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Monetary Equilibrium and Business Cycle Theory” (1943, 178).

    Google Scholar 

  • HATANO, K, “Shinyo to keiki hendo no mondai: Schumpeter oyobi Hahn no riron no ginmi” (1934, 109).

    Google Scholar 

  • POLLACK, W.L. Albert Hahns volkswirtschaftliche Theorie des Bankkredits (1937, 132).

    Google Scholar 

  • LUGLI, L, “La funzione dinamica del credito in Schumpeter-Hahn” (1939, 139).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARGET, A.W. ‘The Monetary Aspects of the Schumpeterian System7’ (1951, 315).

    Google Scholar 

  • HABERLER, G, “Schumpeter’s Theory of Interest” (1951, 298).

    Google Scholar 

  • FANNO, M, “Schumpeter et la vitesse de circulation de la monnaie” (1950, 245).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Schumpeter taikei to rei rishi ritsu” (1951, 345).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARBURTON, C, “Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System” (1953, 401).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKAHASHI, T, “Keizai hatten to kin’yu kiko: Schumpeter “Keizai Hatten no Riron” wo chushin toshite” (1958, 555).

    Google Scholar 

  • ISHIDA, K, “Kahei rironniokeru Keynes to Schumpeter” (1956, 496).

    Google Scholar 

  • MASAI, K, “Kahei shihon ni okeru rishi hassei no konkyo: Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes no tachiba wo megutte” (1957, 527).

    Google Scholar 

  • EGAN, J.J. Qualitative Economic Changes in Secular Inflation: An Examination of Schumpeter’s Thesis of Innovation and Autodeflation during Development (1961, 625).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEDIO, A, “L’interesse nella teoria dello sviluppo economico di Joseph Schumpeter” (1968, 756)

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKATSU, H, “Schumpeter ni okeru futatsu no rishi ron” (1961, 643).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYAMI, T, “Schumpeter to Keynes no rishi gainen no hikaku” (1965, 691).

    Google Scholar 

  • HIROE, T, “J.A. Schumpeter to rishi riron” (1965, 692).

    Google Scholar 

  • IWANO, S, “Schumpeter shinyo riron ni kansuru oboegaki” (1963, 664).

    Google Scholar 

  • MANN, F.K, “Einfuehrung”. In J.A Schumpeter. Das Wesen des Geldes (1970, 790).

    Google Scholar 

  • KULLA, B, “Spiethoff, Schumpeter, und “Das Wesen des Geldes”” (1989, 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Paradoxes of Schumpeter’s Zero Interest Rate” (1971, 828).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITAKER, J.K, “The Schumpeterian Stationary State Revisited.” (1971, 832).

    Google Scholar 

  • CALZONI, G. and ROSSI, E, “Credito bancario e processo innovativo in un modello schumpeteriano di sviluppo economico” (1974, 886).

    Google Scholar 

  • HICKEL, R, “Einleitung: Krisenprobleme des ’verschuldeten Steuerstaats”. In R. Goldscheid and J.A. Schumpeter. Die Finanzkrise des Steuerstaats. Beitraege zur politischen Oekonomie der Staatsfinanzen (1976, 925).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Il trattato sulla moneta di J.A. Schumpeter” (1978, 971).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Moneta senza crisi” (1983, 1242).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M, “Moneta senza crisi: Un commento” (1983, 1283).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M, “Credito e innovazione in Marx, Keynes e Schumpeter” (1983, 1281).

    Google Scholar 

  • BELLOFIORE, R, “Moneta e sviluppo nell’analisi di Schumpeter” (1983, 1190).

    Google Scholar 

  • BELLOFIORE, R, “Les aspects monétaires de la théorie de Schumpeter” (1985, 1514).

    Google Scholar 

  • NICCOLI, A, “Il ruolo del credito in Schumpeter” (1984, 1444).

    Google Scholar 

  • PORTA, P, “Osservazioni sulla teoria dinamica dell’interesse” (1985, 1586).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E. Oesterreichische Bankpolitik in der Zeit der grossen Wende 1913–1923. Am Beispiel der Creditanstalt fuer Handel und Gewerbe (1981, 1093).

    Google Scholar 

  • STREISSLER, E, “Schumpeter’s Vienna and the Role of Credit in Innovation” (1982, 1161).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE VECCHI, N, “Introduzione.” In J. A. Schumpeter. Stato e inflazione (1983, 1211).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, F.W, “Fiscal and Monetary Policy in the Context of Development: A Schumpeterian Approach” (1983, 1329).

    Google Scholar 

  • CALLE SAIZ, R, “En el centenario de Schumpeter: Crisis fiscal y su legitimación politica” (1983, 1197).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIDL, C, “The Tax State in Crisis: Can Schumpeterian Public Finance Claim Modem Relevance?” (1984, 1467).

    Google Scholar 

  • WITTMANN, W, “Die Krise des Steurstaates” (1987, 1768).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIMMERMANN, H, “Fiscal Pressure on the Tax State” (1988, 1859).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMARIA, G, “Le teorie complete dell’interesse di Schumpeter e di Keynes” (1983, 1213).

    Google Scholar 

  • SPAHN, H.P, “Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes. Drei Fragmente ueber Geld, Zins und Profit” (1984, 1476).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M, “Innovation et profit chez Marx, Schumpeter et Keynes” (1985, 1578).

    Google Scholar 

  • VERCELLI, A, “Money and Production in Schumpeter and Keynes. Two dichotomies” (1985, 1605).

    Google Scholar 

  • MINSK Y, H.P, “Money and Crisis in Schumpeter and Keynes” (1986, 1665).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE VECCHI, N. (Ed.) La teoria austriaca del capitale e dell’interesse: Fondamenti e discussione (1984, 1382).

    Google Scholar 

  • TANAKA, T, “Mitchell to Schumpeter: Ippan kinko riron no juyo to hinin” (1983, 1339).

    Google Scholar 

  • BELLOFIORE, R. and PICOLLO F, “Schumpeter e Wicksell: Note per un confronto” (1985, 1515).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOYER de, J, “Taux d’intérêt et quantité de monnaie. Note sur la distinction entre deux sphères de circulation chez T. Tooke, K. Wicksell, J.M. Keynes et J.A. Schumpeter” (1985, 1518).

    Google Scholar 

  • YAGI, K, “Austria ni okeru kaheiteki keizai ron no taido: Mises, Schumpeter, Hilferding” (1986, 1692).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEL VECCHIO, G, “Sulla teoria economica delle crisi” (1914, 31).

    Google Scholar 

  • ADAMS, A.B. Economics of Business Cycles (1925, 61).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERSONS, W.M. “Theories of Business Fluctuations” (1927, 74).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAB ERLER, G. Prosperity and Depression. A Theoretical Analysis of Critical Movements (1937, 129).

    Google Scholar 

  • FANNO, M, “Cicli di produzione, cicli di credito e fluttuazioni industriali” (1931, 94).

    Google Scholar 

  • VITO, F, “Il risparmio forzato e la teoria dei cicli economici” (1934, 111).

    Google Scholar 

  • HATANO, K, “Shinyo to keiki hendo no mondai: Schumpeter oyobi Hahn no riron no ginmi” (1934, 109).

    Google Scholar 

  • MIYAGAWA, M, “Schumpeter no “keizai junkan” ni tsuite” (1937, 130).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUSQUET, G.-H, “La théorie des cycles de Schumpeter” (1940, 141).

    Google Scholar 

  • KUZNETS, S, “Schumpeter’s Business Cycles” (1940, 144).

    Google Scholar 

  • FERRANTE, R.U, “Variazioni cicliche e storia economica nel pensiero di J.A. Schumpeter” (1941, 155).

    Google Scholar 

  • ESTEY, J.A. Business Cycles. Their Nature, Cause, and Control (1941, 154).

    Google Scholar 

  • DU PRIEZ, L.H. Des mouvements économiques généraux (1947, 196).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANGELL, J.W. Investment and Business Cycles (1941, 152).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “Monetary Equilibrium and Business Cycle Theory” (1943, 178).

    Google Scholar 

  • BENNION, E.G, “Unemployment in the Theories of Schumpeter and Keynes” (1943, 167).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAAVELMO, T, “Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories” (1943, 172).

    Google Scholar 

  • FELS, R, “The Long-Wave Depression, 1873–97” (1949, 214).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOS LABINI, P, “Le problème des cycles économiques de longue durée” (1950, 270).

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, R.A, “Business Cycles in the Interwar Period.“The Quantitative Historical” Approach” (1949, 215).

    Google Scholar 

  • PREDOEHL, A, “Gesetz und Gestalt: Methodologische Bemerkungen zu Schumpeters “Business Cycles”” (1950, 263).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEMENCE, R.V. and DOODY, F.S. The Schumpeterian System (1950, 238).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHELBY, G.D. An Analysis of Schumpeter’s Business Cycle Theory (1955, 470).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNHAUER, E. Eine Interpretation der Konjunkturtheorie Joseph Schumpeters (1958, 542).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEHNIS, F. Der Beitrag des spaeten Schumpeter zur Konjunkturforschung. Interpretation und methodologische Wuerdigung der “Business Cycles” (1960, 606).

    Google Scholar 

  • HANSEN, A.H, “Schumpeter’s Contribution to Business Cycle Theory” (1951, 301).

    Google Scholar 

  • TSURU, S, “Business Cycle and Capitalism: Schumpeter vs Marx” (1952, 374).

    Google Scholar 

  • KUTSUMI, I, “Kin’yu shijo no riron: Schumpeter Keiki ron no kenkyu” (1951, 310).

    Google Scholar 

  • DATE, K, “Shogeki no mondai to tekio kiko no mondai; Schumpeter keiki junkan rirono chushiunishite” (1955, 445).

    Google Scholar 

  • WARBURTON, C, “Money and Business Fluctuations in the Schumpeterian System” (1953, 401).

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMABE, N, “Schumpeter taikei ni okeru kahei to keizai hendo” (1954, 437).

    Google Scholar 

  • EYCKEN van der, H, “Equilibre général et theorie du cycle: Hicks et Schumpeter” (1955, 449).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMAZAKI, M. Schumpeter Keizaigaku no Kihon Mondai (1955, 451).

    Google Scholar 

  • STRASSMANN, W.P, “Creative Destruction and Partial Obsolescence in American Economic Development” (1959, 587).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURKE, W, “Mitchell — a Schumpeterian Criticism” (1961, 622).

    Google Scholar 

  • DATE, K, “Schumpeter model ni okeru junkan to susei” (1960, 597).

    Google Scholar 

  • NAGATOMO, I, “Schumpeter no keiki hendo riron” (1960, 613).

    Google Scholar 

  • IWANO, S, “Schumpeter keiki junkan riron no ichi kosatsu” (1961, 628).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, S, “Schumpeter no keiki junkan riron: Sono hihan teki kosatsu” (1965, 701).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, S, “Schumpeter no keiki junkan ron hihan” (1966, 720).

    Google Scholar 

  • NEUMARK, F, “Zyklen in der Geschichte oekonomischer Ideen” (1975, 914).

    Google Scholar 

  • GROSSI, M, “Il movimento dei prezzi e delle altre quantità economiche secondo la teoria delle fluttuazioni economiche di Joseph Schumpeter” (1971, 813).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Introduzione,” In J.A. Schumpeter. Il processo capitalistico. Cicli economici (1977, 955).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSTOW, W.W, “Kondratieff, Schumpeter, and Kuznets: Trend Periods Revisited” (1975, 918).

    Google Scholar 

  • HAWLEY, J.B, “The Schumpeterian Model of the Cyclical Process in the Evolution of American Capitalism, 1786–1939” (1978, 972).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARTMAN, R.S. and VHEELER, D.R, “Schumpeterian Wages of Innovation and Infrastructure Development in Great Britain and the United States: The Kondratieff Cycle Revisited” (1979, 1002).

    Google Scholar 

  • ITO, M, “Sengo Nihon keizai no keiki junkan: Schumpeter Keiki junkan ron ni yoru kosatsu” (1980, 1038).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J.E, “Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism’s Creative Destruction: A Comparative Restatement” (1980, 1031).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter to keizai-shakaigaku: “Keiki junkan ron” ni okeru riron to rekishi ni tsuite” (1980, 1040).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEEZY, P.M, “Why Stagnation?” (1982, 1163).

    Google Scholar 

  • NARDOZZI, G, “Schumpeter, la teoria della crescita e i problemi attuali” (1982, 1147).

    Google Scholar 

  • PAWLOWSKI, P, “J. Schumpeter o zaleznosci pomiedzy cyklem koniunkturalnym a trendem wzrostu. Opis i analiza krytyczna” (1982, 1151).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROJO, L.A, “Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes y la Gran Depresion.” (1983, 1252).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHERF, H, “Marx, Schumpeter, Keynes: Gibt es eine zeitunabhaengige oekonomische Krisentheorie?” (1983, 1314).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOMBACH, G, “Keynes, Marx, Schumpeter — und die Wirtschaftskrise von heute” (1983, 1195).

    Google Scholar 

  • IKI, M, “Kakushin to choki junkan ron no fukken” (1983, 1254). SCREPANTI, E, “Il modello neoschumpeteriano delle onde lunghe” (1983, 1317).

    Google Scholar 

  • TZUR, E, “Kondratieffs Long Cycles Theory (Part C) — From Kondratiefif to Schumpeter” (1984, 1492).

    Google Scholar 

  • LOW, W, “Discoveries, Innovations, and Business Cycles” (1984, 1426).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTH WELL, R, “Innovaciones tecnológicas y ciclos largos en el desarrollo economico” (1984, 1457).

    Google Scholar 

  • TICHY, G, “Die endogene Innovation als Triebkraft in Schumpeters Konjunkturtheorie” (1985, 1602).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEINKNECHT, A, “Innovationsschuebe und Lange Wellen. Was bringen “neo-schumpeterianische” Kriseninterpretationen?” (1984, 1415).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOSLABINI, P, “New Aspects of the Cyclical Development of the Economy” (1984, 1486).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZINN, K.G, “Zyklus, Stabilitaet, und Geldneutralitaet. Eine lehrgeschichtliche Ergaenzung zum Problem der potentialorientierten Geldpolitik auf der Grundlage von Schumpeters Entwicklungstheorie” (1983, 135).

    Google Scholar 

  • TICHY, G, “Schumpeter’s Business Cycle Theory. Its Importance for our Time” (1984, 1489).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAHL, J, “Creative Destruction: The Significance of Schumpeter’s Economic Doctrines” (1985, 1546).

    Google Scholar 

  • BALDWIN, W.L, “Creative Destruction” (1987, 1699).

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTGOMERY, E. and WASCHER, W, “Creative Destruction and the Behavior of Productivity over the Business Cycles” (1988, 1821).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERELMAN, M, “Schumpeter, David Wells and Creative Destruction” (1988, 1830).

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C, “Schumpeter’s “Business Cycles” Revisited” (1988, 1795).

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEINKNECHT, A. Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity. Schumpeter’s Long Cycle Reconsidered (1987, 1728).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M, “Growing in Long and Short Waves — Schumpeter” (1988, 1800).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M, “Towards a Theory of Long Waves” (1989, 1879).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M, “Steady State and Growth Cycles: Von Neumann and Schumpeter” (1989, 1880).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIESE, H, “Keynes, Schumpeter und die Krise” (1986, 1675). and WOLF, J, “Les fluctuations économiques chez Schumpeter et Keynes” (1989, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARGOLIN, S.O, “Kapitalizm I imperializm (Po povodu raboty Schumpeter “Zur Soziologie der Imperialismen”.)” (1922, 51).

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEWE, A, “Zur oekonomischen Theorie des Imperialismus” (1924, 58).

    Google Scholar 

  • WINSLOW, E.M, “Marxian, Liberal, and Sociological Theories of Imperialism” (1931, 97).

    Google Scholar 

  • BECKERATH von, H, “Joseph A. Schumpeter as a Sociologist” (1950, 233).

    Google Scholar 

  • VUILLEMIN, J, “Les classes sociales chez Schumpeter et dans la réalité” (1950, 277).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEEZY, P.M, “Introduction.” In J.A. Schumpeter. Imperialism and Social Classes (1951, 333).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, O.H, “Schumpeter and Marx: Imperialism and Social Classes in the Schumpeterian System” (1951, 335).

    Google Scholar 

  • WEILLER, J, “L’économie sociologique de Schumpeter” (1951, 341).

    Google Scholar 

  • KARRER, H, “Schumpeters Beitrag zur Soziologie” (1951–1952, 362).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEIMANN, E, “Schumpeter and the Problems of Imperialism” (1952, 359).

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENE, M, “Schumpeter’s Imperialism: A Critical Note” (1952, 356).

    Google Scholar 

  • KNORR, K, “Theories of Imperialism” (1952, 363).

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUGER, D.H, “Hobson, Lenin, and Schumpeter on Imperialism” (1955, 457).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEUTSCH, K.W, “Joseph Schumpeter as an Analyst of Sociology and Economic History” (1956, 493).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZOTTMANN, A, “Schumpeters soziologische, dogmenhistorische und biographische Aufsaetze” (1955, 483).

    Google Scholar 

  • GUIHENEUF, R, “Psycologie individuelle et psycologie sociale dans l’oeuvre de Schumpeter “Capitalisme, socialisme et démocratie”” (1952, 357).

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLTERER, J, “Quadragesimo Anno: Schumpeter’s Alternative to the Omnipotent State” (1951, 330).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, H.B, “Schumpeter as Sociologist” (1960, 599).

    Google Scholar 

  • EISERMANN, G, “Joseph Schumpeter als Soziologe” (1965, 689).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAUTSKY, J.H, “J.A. Schumpeter and Karl Kautsky: Parallel Theories of Imperialism” (1961, 630).

    Google Scholar 

  • NASR, Z, “Deux théoriciens de l’imperialisme. J. Schumpeter et A. Loewe” (1962, 656).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, S, “Teikokushugi ron: Schumpeter to Lenin” (1967, 740).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACDONALD, R, “Schumpeter and Max Weber: Central Visions and Social Theories” (1965, 698).

    Google Scholar 

  • STASSEN, J.L, “Sociaal-economische en staatkundige opvattingen van Schumpeter” (1965, 706).

    Google Scholar 

  • MUSSCHE, G, “Le système de Schumpeter et la sociologie économique” (1968, 757).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T, “Shihonshugi hatten to shakai kozo no henka ni tsuite: Schumpeter no shihonshugi hokai ron” (1970, 793).

    Google Scholar 

  • WATERS, W.R, “Schumpeter’s Contribution and Catholic Social Thought” (1961, 644).

    Google Scholar 

  • NITSCH, T.O, “Schumpeter and Catholicism: A Comment” (1964, 679).

    Google Scholar 

  • CRAMER, D.L. and LEATHERS, C.G, “Veblen and Schumpeter on Imperialism” (1977, 949).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T, “Schumpeter to keizai shakaigaku no konpon mondai” (1970, 794).

    Google Scholar 

  • GUILHON-ALBUQUERUQUE, J.A, “Notes sur le système du sous-developpement, le role de l’Etat et le concept de classes moyennes modernes” (1972, 841).

    Google Scholar 

  • CASTELLANO, L, “Innovazione tecnologica e conflitto di classe” (1977, 947).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEATHERS, C.G, “Intellectual Activism: A Schumpeterian Threat to the New Industrial State” (1971, 820).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZALD, M.N. and MCCARTHY, J.D, “Organizational Intellectuals and the Criticism of Society” (1975, 921).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZNANIECKI, F, “Spoleczne role uczonych a historyczne cechy wiedzy” (1976, 924).

    Google Scholar 

  • BACHRACH, P. The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (1967, 725).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOPPINO, M, “Democrazia e classe politica: Un confronto tra Schumpeter e Mosca” (1973, 881).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARTORI, G, “Anti-Elitism Revisited” (1978, 980).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEAHY, W.H. and McKEE, D.L., “On Goldfields, Libraries, Cities and Schumpeter” (1974, 891).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEAHY, W.H. and McKEE, D.L., “A Note on Urbanism and Schumpeter’s Theory of Development” (1976, 932).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter to keizai-shakaigaku: “Keiki junkan ron” ni okeru riron to rekishi ni tsuite” (1980, 1040).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKAHASHI, K, “Kigyosha kino to kanryoseika ni kansuru ichi cosatsu: Schumpeter no kigyosha kino chinpuka ron wo megutte” (1980, 1056).

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMAGUCHI, M, “Gijutsu kakushin to shakai kakumei: Schumpeter no gendai teki imi” (1982, 1166).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARINELLI, A, “La sociologia dell’imperialismo in J.A. Schumpeter” (1982, 1145).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter taikei to teikokushugi no mondai” (1983, 1260).

    Google Scholar 

  • VESTUTI, G, “Schumpeter e la teoria dell’imperialismo” (1984, 1496).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Kyosei no naka no shakai kaikyu” (1983, 1257).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Keizai hatten to shakai kaikyu: Schumpeter no shakai shinka ni kansuru rekishi kaishaku no hoho” (1984, 1412).

    Google Scholar 

  • ETHERINGTON, N, “Reconsidering Theories of Imperialism” (1982, 1123).

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLFF, J, “El imperialismo en Schumpeter y Lenin” (1983, 2351).

    Google Scholar 

  • LATOUCHE, S, “Les ruses de la raison et les surprises de l’histoire: Marx, Keynes et Schumpeter, théoriciens de l’impérialisme” (1985, 1564).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, L.E. and HUTTENBACK, R.A, “Imperialism and Social Class (Apologies to Marx and Schumpeter): Imperial Investors in the Age of High Imperialism” (1986, 1625).

    Google Scholar 

  • FERRERA, M, “J.A. Schumpeter, la teoria competitiva e il dibattito sull’elitismo democratico” (1985, 1535).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALBERTONI, E.A, “Teoria de las elites y elitismo” (1987, 1697).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDIC, F.M. and ANDIC, S, “An Exploration into Fiscal Sociology: Ibn Khaldun, Schumpeter, and Public Choice” (1984–1985, 1504).

    Google Scholar 

  • JENSEN, H.E, “J.A. Schumpeter on Economic Sociology” (1985, 1554).

    Google Scholar 

  • PERMAN, D, “Schumpeter’s Sociology of Economics: The Role of the “Competent Economist”” (1985, 1584).

    Google Scholar 

  • DYER, A.W, “Schumpeter as an Economic Radical: An Economic Sociology Assessed” (1988, 1791).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A. (Ed.). Schumpeter’s Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy after Forty Years (1981, 1082).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOTTOMORE, T, “The Decline of Capitalism, Sociologically Considered” (1981, 1069).

    Google Scholar 

  • ACHAM, K, “Schumpeter — The Sociologist” (1984, 1360).

    Google Scholar 

  • MARTINELLI, A, “Analisi economica e analisi sociologica nel sistema teorico di Schumpeter” (1985, 1574).

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLINS, R, “Weber and Schumpeter” (1986, 1621).

    Google Scholar 

  • PORTIS, E.B, “Charismatic Leadership and Cultural Democracy” (1987, 1748).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIONOYA, Y, “Schumpeter on Schmoller and Weber: A Methodology of Economic Sociology or Institutional Economics” (1989, 1902).

    Google Scholar 

  • SWEDBERG, R, “Joseph A. Schumpeter and the Tradition of Economic Sociology” (1989, 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • SALIN, E, “Nochmals: Ein dritter Weg? (Bemerkungen zu J. Schumpeters Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy)” (1944, 185).

    Google Scholar 

  • HARDY, C.O, “Schumpeter on Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1945, 187).

    Google Scholar 

  • WEILLER, J, “Capitalisme, Socialisme and Democracie d’après J. Schumpeter” (1946, 195).

    Google Scholar 

  • LENEL, H.O. and ROEPKE, W, “Muss der Sozialismus kommen? Zu Josef Schumpeters Buch “Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie”” (1948, 208).

    Google Scholar 

  • BECKERATH von, E, “Groesse und Verfall des Kapitalismus, Betrachtungen zu Schumpeters Buch ueber “Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie”” (1950, 232).

    Google Scholar 

  • AYRES, C.E, “Capitalism in Retrospect, with a Comparison of Two Recent Works: J.A. Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy and H. von Beckerath’s In Defense of the West” (1943, 165).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACHLUP, F, “Capitalism and Its Future Appraised by Two Liberal Economists” (1943, 175).

    Google Scholar 

  • JOEHR, W.A, “Sozialismus? Kritische Bemerkungen zu den Buechern von Schumpeter und Hayek” (1945, 188).

    Google Scholar 

  • MINEO, M, “Considerazioni su Marx e Schumpeter” (1946, 191).

    Google Scholar 

  • HILFERDING, P, “Schumpetere Marx” (1949, 217).

    Google Scholar 

  • FAIN, G, “Une “expérience intellectuelle” de Schumpeter: Capitalisme, Socialisme et Démocratie” (1951, 294).

    Google Scholar 

  • ORTLIEB, H.D, “Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie”. “Die Grundgedanken des Buches von Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1956, 507).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAINGUY, Y, “Capitalisme, socialisme et… neo-liberalisme” (1951, 313).

    Google Scholar 

  • WRIGHT, D.M, “Schumpeter’s Political Philosophy” (1951, 342).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEWEY, D, “Professor Schumpeter on Socialism: The Case of Britain” (1950, 241).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAKAMOTO, J, “Shakaishugi hitsuzen ron ni okeru Sweezy, Dobb, Schumpeter” (1952, 371).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRAUNREUTHER, K, “Der moderne Bourgeoissozialismus des Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (1957, 507).

    Google Scholar 

  • KUMAGAI, H. and ONO, T, “Schumpeter taikei to shakaishugi no mondai” (1957, 525).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHLESINGER, J.R. and PHILLIPS, A, “The Ebb Tide of Capitalism? Schumpeter’s Prophecy Re-examined” (1959, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • DOWNS, A. An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957, 521).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE SCHWEINITZ, K. jr, “Free Enterprise and Democracy” (1953, 385).

    Google Scholar 

  • BECKER, G.S, “Competition and Democracy” (1958, 541).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOTTLIEB, M, “The Ideological Influences of Schumpeter’s Thought” (1959, 566).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAUDE, H, “Schumpeter si curentul reformist din Franta” (1958, 545).

    Google Scholar 

  • MPANTALOUKAS, K.B. E Tuxi tes Kefalaiokratia kata tous Marx kai Schumpeter (1953, 395).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Shihonshugi hatten no ronri: Marx to Schumpeter” (1954, 438).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAVINA, S, “Czenaucnaja teorija schodstua dvuch sisteh” (1963, 663).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAGA, V.F. Sovremennye psevdonaucnye teorii socializma (1966, 709).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVKIN, R.M, “Kritika teorii transformacii kapitalizma J. Schumpeter” (1959, 580).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVKIN, R.M, “Shumpeterovskaja teorija “samolikvidacii kapitalizma”, orudie burzhuaznoj apologetiki” (1963, 668).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVKIN, R.M, “Kritika antimarksistskoy teorii “samolikvidacii kapitalizma” Schumpeter” (1964, 683).

    Google Scholar 

  • BELL, D, “The Prospects of American Capitalism: On Keynes, Schumpeter, and Galbraith” (1960, 591).

    Google Scholar 

  • BURNS, E.M, “Twentieth Century Conservatism” (1960, 595).

    Google Scholar 

  • SIEVERS, A.M. Revolution, Evolution and the Economic Order (1962, 659).

    Google Scholar 

  • PLAMENATZ, J.P, “Some American Images of Democracy” (1968, 758).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEISEL, J.H. The Myth of the Ruling Class: Gaetano Mosca and the Elite (1958, 551).

    Google Scholar 

  • BACHRACH, P. The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (1967, 725).

    Google Scholar 

  • LICHTMAN, R, “The Facade of Equality in Liberal Democratic Theory” (1969, 772).

    Google Scholar 

  • MIETH, G. Schumpeter zur Wirtschaftsrechnung im Sozialismus. Eine theoretische Auseinandersetzg und historische Widerlegung (1961, 663).

    Google Scholar 

  • STRATIGHIOU, M. Kapitalismus und Sozialismus bei Schumpeter: Eine vergleichende Darstellung und Kritik von Schumpeter und Marx (1961, 642).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOELLNER, L, “Wissens- und geldsoziologische Bemerkungen zu Karl Marx und Josef Schumpeter” (1964, 676).

    Google Scholar 

  • LUKAWER, E, “Marks i Schumpeter o gospodarce socjalistycznej” (1967, 734).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOPPINO, M, “Democrazia e “classe politica”: Un confronto tra Schumpeter e Mosca” (1973, 881).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’ALIMONTE, R, “Sulla teoria della democrazia competitiva” (1977, 950).

    Google Scholar 

  • OTOOLE, L.J. jr, “Schumpeter’s “Democracy”: A Critical View” (1977, 970).

    Google Scholar 

  • SARTORI, G, “Anti-Elitism Revisited” (1978, 980).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T. Schumpeter Taikei Kenkyu: Shihonshugi no Hatten to Hokai (1971, 824).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T. (Ed.) Shihonshugi to Shakaishugi (1973, 876).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T, “Schumpeter to Marx: Keizai hatten no ronri ni tsuite” (1970, 795).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALDRUP, D, “Schumpeter und der Marxismus” (1971, 809).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T, “Schumpeter to keyzai seisaku no mondai” (1972, 853).

    Google Scholar 

  • TOJO, T, “Sangyo shakai no riron to seisaku: Keynes to Schumpeter no kontei ni aru mono” (1972, 859).

    Google Scholar 

  • KRJLOVA, N.A, “Kritika burzuazmos modeli socializma u rabotach Schumpeter” (1975, 911).

    Google Scholar 

  • KRJLOVA, N.A, “Burzuaznaya koncepciya socializma v rabotach J. Schumpeter” (1978, 976).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOTTOMORE, T, “Introduction.” In J.A. Schumpeter. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1976, 924).

    Google Scholar 

  • GROENEWEGEN, J, ““Capitalism is Change”: Joseph Alois Schumpeter” (1981, 1079).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTHSCHILD, K.W, “Schumpeter and Socialism” (1982, 1155).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEERTJE, A. (Ed.). Schumpeter’s Vision: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy after Forty Years (1981, 1082).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEILBRONER, R.L, “Was Schumpeter Right?” (1981, 1083).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMBERS, H.W, “The Vision” (1981, 1090).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1981, 1099).

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITHIES, A, “Schumpeter Predictions” (1981, 1100).

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAASEN, E.M, “La marcha hacia el socialismo” (1983, 1204).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOTANI, Y, “Schumpeter ni okeru shi honshugi no unmei” (1983, 1268).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONO, T, “Schumpeter to shihonshugi no shorai” (1983, 1291).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIONOYA, Y, “Shihonshugi bunmei no suitai to shakaisugi” (1983, 1323).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELS, W.J, “A Critique of Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy” (1985, 1591).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J.E, “Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism’s Creative Destruction: A Comparative Restatement” (1980, 1031).

    Google Scholar 

  • FOSTER, J.B, “Theories of Capitalist Transformation: Critical Notes on the Comparison of Marx and Schumpeter” (1983, 1234).

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLIOTT, J.E, “Schumpeter and Marx on Capitalist Transformation” (1983, 1228).

    Google Scholar 

  • FELLNER, W.J, “March into Socialism, or Viable Postwar Stage of Capitalism?” (1981, 1076).

    Google Scholar 

  • WILES, P, “A Sovietological View” (1981, 1103).

    Google Scholar 

  • DILLARD, D, “Schumpeter, the Marx of the Upper Classes” (1983, 1215).

    Google Scholar 

  • IWAI, K, “Schumpeter: Okurete kita Marx” (1983, 1255).

    Google Scholar 

  • BARRERE, C, “Marx et Schumpeter: Deux personnages en quete d’une fin (crises, limites et fin du capitalisme)” (1985, 1512).

    Google Scholar 

  • KEBABDJIAN, G, “Marx, Schumpeter et la question de la transition au socialisme” (1985, 1557).

    Google Scholar 

  • KOIKE, M.-TAKEUCHI, Y.-HAYASAKA, T.-FUKUOKA, M. and MARUYAMA, T, “Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter: Shihonshugi no shorai” (1983, 1267).

    Google Scholar 

  • REQUEIJO GONZALES, J, “Très visiones del capitalismo” (1983, 1302).

    Google Scholar 

  • TSURUTA, M, “Shihonshugi no unmei: Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter wo megutte” (1983, 1344).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAIRE, G, “Marx, Keynes, Schumpeter: Trois visions du capitalisme” (1985, 1520).

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODWIN, R.M, “The M-K-S System: The Functioning and Evolution of Capitalism” (1986, 1636).

    Google Scholar 

  • XENOS, N, “Democracy as Method: Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1981, 1105).

    Google Scholar 

  • RAPAPORT, E, “Is Democracy Possible?” (1982, 1153). CRAMER, D.L. and LEATHERS, C.G, “The Schumpeterian Foundation of Down’s Economic Theory of Democracy: A Critical Evaluation” (1983, 1205).

    Google Scholar 

  • FERRERA, M, “Schumpeter e il dibattito sulla teoria “competitiva” della democrazia” (1984, 1390).

    Google Scholar 

  • SEIDL, C, “Schumpeter contre Keynes: Politique “conomique par la consommation ou politique” conomique par les investissements?” (1983, 1319).

    Google Scholar 

  • MITCHELL, W.C, “Schumpeter and Public Choice” (1984, 1436–1437).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “The Relevance of Schumpeter’s Ideas for Economic Policy” (1984, 1478).

    Google Scholar 

  • BALABKINS, N.W, “Joseph A. Schumpeter. His Legacy for Economists and Economic Policy Makers in the 1980’s” (1983, 1181).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHINOHARA, M, “Schumpeter to gendai sekai” (1983, 1322).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEATHERS, C.G, “Thatcher — Reagan Conservatism and Schumpeter’s Prognosis for Capitalism” (1984, 1422).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHACHNER-BLAZIZEK, P, “The Current Relevance of Schumpeter’s Theory of Decay of Capitalism” (1984, 1462).

    Google Scholar 

  • PROTO, M, “Su Schumpeter e la scienza politica” (1984, 1453).

    Google Scholar 

  • URBANI, G, “Schumpeter e la scienza politica” (1984, 1493).

    Google Scholar 

  • BECKER, G.S, “Pressure Groups and Political Behavior” (1985, 1513).

    Google Scholar 

  • URBANI, G, “J.A. Schumpeter e la conoscenza empirica dei fenomeni politici” (1985, 1604).

    Google Scholar 

  • BRONFENBRENNER, M, “Schumpeter’s Contributions to the Study of Comparative Economic Systems” (1982, 1112).

    Google Scholar 

  • GIERSCH, H, “Schumpeter, and the Current and Future Development of the World Economy” (1982, 1128).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMBELET, J.-C, “Economic Cooperation, Countertrade and the Marketplace”. Schumpeter’s “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1982, 1139).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELSON, P.A, “The World Economy at Century’s End” (1983, 1309).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F. and SEIDL, C, “Einleitung: Schumpeters politische und wirtschaftspolitische Schriften” (1985, 1600).

    Google Scholar 

  • MAERZ, E. and KERNBAUER, H, “Die Aktualitaet der Schumpeterschen Thesenzur “Krise des Steuerstaates”” (1986, 1660).

    Google Scholar 

  • MINSKY, H.P, “The Crises of 1983 and the Prospects for Advanced Capitalist Economies” (1986, 1664).

    Google Scholar 

  • GIERSCH, H, “Economic Policies in the Age of Schumpeter” (1987, 1712).

    Google Scholar 

  • MUELLER, K, “Die Schumpeter-Renaissance. Eine aktuelle Erscheinungsform neokonservativer buergerlicher politischer Oekonomie” (1987, 1738).

    Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, P.M, “The Role of Government in Changing Industrial Societies: A Schumpeter Perspective” (1988, 1807).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNEIDER, F.M, “The Role of Government in Changing Industrial Societies. A Schumpeter Perspective: Discussion” (1988, 1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • GRUESKE, K.D, “The Role of Government in Changing Industrial Societies: A Schumpeter Perspective: Discussion” (1988, 1801).

    Google Scholar 

  • STOLPER, W.F, “J.A. Schumpeter: The Role of Government” (1989, 1904).

    Google Scholar 

  • ALBERTONI, E.A, “Teoria de las elitesy elitism” (1987, 1697).

    Google Scholar 

  • ARGERI, D. La teoria della democrazia di J. A. Schumpeter (1988, 1777).

    Google Scholar 

  • LAMBELET, J.-C, “Schumpeter’s “Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy”: A Fresh Reading” (1987, 1732).

    Google Scholar 

  • BEAUGRAND, P, “Capitalisme et Socialisme: L’efflcacité compare des systèmes” (1989, 1866).

    Google Scholar 

  • HUTCHISON, T.W, “Schumpeter on Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1989, 1887).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOUSQUET, G.-H, “Les tendances nouvelles de Fècole autrichienne” (1924, 55).

    Google Scholar 

  • DEL VECCHIO, G, “Le odierne tendenze dell’economia politica” (1930, 88).

    Google Scholar 

  • FERRANTE, R.U. [FUBINI, R.] “Variazioni cicliche e storia economica nel pensiero di J.A. Schumpeter” (1941, 155).

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, R.A, “Business Cycles in the Interwar Period. The “Quantitative Historical” Approach” (1949, 215).

    Google Scholar 

  • USHER, A.P, “Historical Implications of the Theory of Economic Development” (1951, 340).

    Google Scholar 

  • LEDUC, G, “Schumpeter, disciple de Walras” (1950, 254).

    Google Scholar 

  • BAYER, H, “Joseph Schumpeter et Fècole économique autrichienne” (1951, 283).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYMANS, A, “Le “Research Center in Entrepreneurial History”” (1950, 272).

    Google Scholar 

  • VINER, J, “J.A.S. History of Economic Analysis” (1954, 435).

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBBINS, L, “J.A.S. History of Economic Analysis” (1955, 468).

    Google Scholar 

  • STARK, W, “Joseph Schumpeters Umwertung der Werte. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit seiner History of Economic Analysis” (1955, 475).

    Google Scholar 

  • SELAN, V, “II pensiero economico italiano nella visione di Joseph Schumpeter” (1956, 510).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE ROSA, L, “La “Storia dell’analisi economica” di Schumpeter e gli economisti italiani” (1961, 623).

    Google Scholar 

  • DE ROOVER, R, “Joseph A. Schumpeter and Scholastic Economics” (1957, 520).

    Google Scholar 

  • MEEK, R.L, “Is Economics Biased? A Heretical View of a Leading Thesis in Schumpeter’s History” (1957, 528).

    Google Scholar 

  • MANN, F.K, “Bemerkungen ueber Schumpeters Einfluss auf die amerikanische Wirtschaftstheorie” (1958, 549).

    Google Scholar 

  • AUFRICHT, H, “The Methodology of Schumpeter’s History of Economic Analysis” (1958, 539).

    Google Scholar 

  • TAKAHASHI, T., “Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Riron to rekishi to no setten” (1959, 588).

    Google Scholar 

  • MORI, G, “Premesse ed implicazioni di una recente specializzazione storiografica americana: La “Entrepreneurial History” (1960, 612).

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON, B.J, “Aristotle, Schumpeter, and the Metallist Tradition” (1961, 626).

    Google Scholar 

  • AOYAMA, H. and YOSHIDA, S, “Schumpeter Keizai bunseki no rekishi no rinkaku to mondaiten: Hoyaku no kansei ni chinande” (1966, 708).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAWATA, T, “Gakusetsu narabini haho: J.A. Schumpeter” (1969, 771).

    Google Scholar 

  • ESTAPE, F, “La historia del pensamiento economico segun Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1971, 811).

    Google Scholar 

  • KAUDER, E, “Austro-Marxism vs. Austro-Marginalism” (1970, 789).

    Google Scholar 

  • KANAZASHI, M, “Schumpeter keizaigaku no gensen: Boehm to Walrasno kankei wochushinni” (1971, 816).

    Google Scholar 

  • SYLOSLABINI, P, “Introduzione.” In J.A Schumpeter. Teoria dello Sviluppo Economico (1971, 831).

    Google Scholar 

  • GIVA, D, “Storia dell’analisi economica e teoria dello sviluppo. Note su Schumpeter” (1977, 953).

    Google Scholar 

  • CRAVER, E, “The Emigration of Austrian Economists” (1986, 1624).

    Google Scholar 

  • DONZELLI, F. “Schumpeter e la teoria economica neoclassica” (1983, 1219).

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, D, “Joseph Schumpeter and the Austrian School of Economics” (1983, 1326).

    Google Scholar 

  • ANDREWS, M.W, “Is Schumpeter Compatible with Neoclassical Economics? Response” (1986, 1611).

    Google Scholar 

  • SAMUELS, W.J, “The Influence of Friedrich von Wieser on Joseph A. Schumpeter” (1983, 1308).

    Google Scholar 

  • YOSHIDA, S, “Weber to Schumpeter: Doitsu rekishi gakuha to Osutoria gakuha wo koete” (1983, 1355).

    Google Scholar 

  • NEI, M, “Schumpeter shiso keisei ni okeru Marshall no juyoseinitsuite” (1986, 1669).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEFOLD, B, “Schumpeter as a Walrasian Austrian and Keynes as a Classical Marshallian” (1986, 1678).

    Google Scholar 

  • FEIWEL, G.R, “Schumpeter on Walras, Marshall, and Beyond” (1986, 1633).

    Google Scholar 

  • MESSORI, M, “Storia e teoria economica: Schumpeter, Keynes e il ciclo del capitalismo” (1983, 1282).

    Google Scholar 

  • TOJO, T, “Keynes, Schumpeter soshite mirai: 20 seiki no rekishi teki teii” (1984, 1491).

    Google Scholar 

  • JENSEN, H.E, “New Lights on J.A. Schumpeter’s Theory of the History of economics” (1987, 1721)

    Google Scholar 

  • ASSO, P.F. and BARUCCI, E, “On the History of the “History”. The Unpublished Introduction of Schumpeter’s History of Economic Analysis” (1989, 1863).

    Google Scholar 

  • SHIONOYA, Y, “Schumpeter, Schmoller, Weber: Rekishi ninshiki no hoho ron” (1988, 1847).

    Google Scholar 

  • BOEHM, S, “The Austrian Tradition: Schumpeter and Mises” (1989, 1867).

    Google Scholar 

  • JESSUA, C, “Tradition britannique et tradition continentale: Le cas de Schumpeter et de Keynes” (1989, 1888).

    Google Scholar 

  • SANTARELLI, E, “L’influsso dell’analisi schumpeteriana della funzione imprenditoriale e del credito nel pensiero economico italiano tra le due guerre” (1984, 1459)

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAZIANI, A, “Schumpeter and Italian Economic Thought in the Inter-war Period” (1989, 1884)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Augello, M.M. (1990). The Literature on Joseph A. Schumpeter. A Historical Assessment (1907–1989). In: Joseph Alois SCHUMPETER. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75999-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75999-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-76001-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75999-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics