Advertisement

Decision Making in Ill-Structured Environments and with Multiple Criteria

  • Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann

Abstract

In Multi Criteria Decision Making one is generally concerned with decisions under certainty, i. e. decisions for which the “state” is assumed to be known with certainty. Multi Criteria Decision Making under risk or uncertainty would imply the super-imposition of the problem structures of classical MCDM and that of single criteria decision making under risk, i. e., for instance, the combinations of goal programming with stochastic programming. This would, obviously, become very involved mathematically! In this paper we are not concerned with uncertainties (probabilities) of the Kolmogroroff type but rather with uncertainties as they are considered in the theory of fuzzy sets, possibility theory and the like. It will be shown that for this type of uncertainty (vagueness) which is assumed to be more relevant for MCDM, models and methods exist, which are also adequate for MCDM and which are computationally still feasable.

Keywords

Membership Function Fuzzy Number Triangular Fuzzy Number Fuzzy Environment Fuzzy Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baas, M.S. and Kwakernaak, H. (1977), “Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets”, Automatica, 13, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J.F. and Guild, N.C.F. (1979), “Comparison of fuzzy sets on the same decision space”, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 2, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L,A. (1970), “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment”, Mgt. Sc., 17, B141–164.Google Scholar
  4. Bortolan, G. and Degani, R. (1985), “A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 15, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chames, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1961), Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, S.H. (1985), “Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1984), “Criteria aggregation and ranking of alternatives in the framework of fuzzy set theory”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 209–240.Google Scholar
  9. Hannan, E.L. (1981), “Linear programming with multiple fuzzy goals”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang, Ch.-L. and Yoon,K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Hwang, Ch.-L., Masud, A.S. (1979), Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Jain, R. (1977), “Procedure for multi-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets”, Int. Journal Systems Science, 8, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahne, H.W. and Tucker, A.W. (1951), “Nonlinear Programming”, in J. Neyman (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.Google Scholar
  14. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983), “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leberling, H. (1981), “On finding compromise solutions in multi-criteria problems using the fuzzy min-operator”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roy, B. (1986), “Partial Preference Analysis and Decision Aid; The Fuzzy Outranking Relation Concept”, SEMA, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Rubin, P.A. and Narasimhan, R. (1984), “Fuzzy goal programming with rested priorities”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 14, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saaty, Th.L. (1978), “Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saaty, Th.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Siskos, J., Lochard, J. and Lombard, J. (1984), “A multicriteria decision making methodology under fuzziness: appreciation to the evaluation of radiological protection in nuclear power plants”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 261–284.Google Scholar
  21. Tong, R.M. and Bonissone, P.P. (1984), “Linguistic solutions to fuzzy decision problems”, in H.-J. Zimmermann et al. ( 1984 ), 323–334.Google Scholar
  22. Werners, B. (1984), Interaktive Entscheidungsunterstützung durch ein flexibles mathematisches Programmierungssystem, Mühchen.Google Scholar
  23. Yager, R.R. (1978), “Fuzzy decision making including unequal objectives”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zadeh, L.A. (1977), “ Linguistic characterization of preference relations as a basis for choice in social systems”, Memo UCB/ERL M77/24, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  25. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1976), “Description and optimization of fuzzy systems, Internat. J. Gen. Systems, 2, 209–215.Google Scholar
  26. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1978), “Fuzzy programming and linear program-ming with several objective functions”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zimmermann, H.-J. and Zysno, P. (1983), “Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimmermann, H.-J., Zadeh, L.A. and Gaines, B.R. (eds.) (1984), Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis, North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1985), Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
  30. Zimmermann, H.-J. (1987), Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of TechnologyR.W.T.H. AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations