The Implications of Monopsony for Regional Technological Change

  • Michael Bradfield
Conference paper


Much of the economic literature, including that dealing with technological change, implicitly assumes competitive markets. To the extent that the literature introduces market imperfections, it focuses on the product market, largely ignoring factor markets. For example, Scherer (1980) devotes less than two per cent of his study of market structure to the analysis of monopsony. With respect to the impact of product market imperfections on technological change, the academic community is divided. The followers of Schumpeter argue that the scale advantages of oligopoly are required to support research and to reap its benefits before competitors have a chance to imitate innovations. Others argue that oligopoly power reduces the incentive to innovate because the excess profits generated by market power reduce the incentive for efficiency. This paper considers the impact of monopsony on the incentive to adopt technological change, focusing on process rather than product innovation.


Marginal Cost Technological Change Factor Price Supply Curve Average Total Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batra, R. and Scully, G.W. (1972) Technical Progress, Economic Growth, and the North-South Wage Differential, Journal of Regional Science, 12, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradfield, M. (1988) Regional Economics: Analysis and Policy in Canada, Toronto McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  3. Bradfield, M. (1987) Making the Economy Boom: Is Militarization the Answer for the Maritimes?, This Magazine, 21 (4), 25–27.Google Scholar
  4. Brusco S. and Sabel, C. (1981) Artisan Production and Economic Growth, in F. Wilkinson (ed.), The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation, Academic Press, London,99–113.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Regional Economic Expansion, undated Occasional Paper, Single-Industry Communities, DREE, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  6. Macdonald, Donald S., et al. (1985) Report of the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  7. Richardson, W. (1973) The Economics of Urban Size, Saxon House, Farnborough.Google Scholar
  8. Scherer, F.M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Houghton Mifflin Co., Second Edition, Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Scherer, F.M. (1984) Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Richardson, W. (1975) Regional Development Polite and Planning in Stain, Saxon House, Farnborough.Google Scholar
  11. Wheat, L. F. (1986) The Determinants of 1963–77 Regional Manufacturing Growth: Why the South and West Grow, Journal of Regional Science, 26 (4) 635–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Winch, D. M. (1960) Input and Output Determination Under Imperfect Competition, The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 26 (4), 631–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bradfield

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations