Skip to main content

Salvage Procedures for Failed Total Hip Prostheses Implanted After Tumor Resection

  • Conference paper
Limb Salvage
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

In our program of limb-saving surgery, we are constantly comparing the possibilities and results of replacing large postresection defects of bone by either allografts or endoprostheses. Endoprostheses as cervicocapital replacement for the proximal femur (Austin Moore type) have had a long history. After resection of a tumor around the hip, total hip replacement by a special long-stem and usually custommade endoprosthesis was started in the late 1960s and was developed further after 1970. Some of our first results have been reported previously [1, 2]. Currently, total hip replacement after tumor resection has become a reliable procedure and gives better results than does replacement of other joints. The immediate results of total hip replacement after tumor resection may be excellent or good in most patients. With prolonged survival, the rate of late complications increases in direct relation to the length of survival and the activity of the patient.

From the Orthopaedic Clinic, Bulovka, Prague, Czechoslovakia

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Matejovsky Z (1973) Results of arthroplasty in tumors affecting the hip. In: Chapchal G (ed) Arthroplasty of the hip. Thieme, New York, pp 226–231

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matejovsky Z (1983) Hip and knee replacement after tumor resection in Czechoslovakia. In: Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design and application. Thieme, Stratton, New York, pp 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) (1983) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design and application. Thieme Stratton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scales JT, Wright KWJ (1983) Major bone and joint replacement using custom implants. In: Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design and application. Thieme, Stratton, New York, pp 149–168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burssens A, Mulier JC, Bosquet M, Hoogmartens M (1983) Treatment of tumors and tumor-like conditions of bone with major prosthetic replacement. In: Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design an application. Thieme, Stratton, New York, pp 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zichner LP, Heipertz W (1983) Replacement of the proximal femur in primary and secondary tumors. In: Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design and application. Thieme, Stratton, New York, pp 195–205

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sim FH, Chao EYS (1983) Segmental prosthetic replacement of the hip and knee. In: Chao EYS, Ivins JC (eds) Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction: the design and application. Thieme, Stratton, New York, pp 247–266

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnsson R, Carlsson A, Kisch K, Moritz U, Zetterström R, Persson BM (1985) Function following mega total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty and healthy matched controls. Clin Orthop 192: 159–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zäger M, Löffler L, Kohn D (1985) Tumorprothese des Hüftgelenkes (Indikation und Ergebnisse). Z Orthop 123: 808–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sim FH, Bowman WE Jr, Wilkins RM, Chao EYS (1985) Limb salvage in primary malignant bone tumors. Orthopedics 8: 574–581

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobbs HS, Scales JT, Wilson IN, Kemp HBS, Burrows HJ, Sneath RS (1981) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur and acetabulum: a survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63: 219–214

    Google Scholar 

  12. Okada Y, Suka T, Sim FH, Gorski JP, Chao EYS (1988) Comparison of replacement prostheses for segmental defects of bone: different porous coatings for extracortical fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70: 160–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carpenter EB (1979) Resection of the proximal third of the femur for chondrosarcoma in a child: replacement with a metallic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61: 628–630

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP (1983) Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65: 474–479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis MM (1986) The use of an expandable and adjustable prosthesis in the treatment of childhood malignant bone tumors of the extemity. Cancer 57: 499–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matejovsky, Z. (1991). Salvage Procedures for Failed Total Hip Prostheses Implanted After Tumor Resection. In: Langlais, F., Tomeno, B. (eds) Limb Salvage. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75881-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75879-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics