Skip to main content

Reconstruction of Bone Defects

  • Conference paper
Book cover Limb Salvage
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

Today, thanks to more precise histological classifications and more detailed surgical staging, conservative operations of bone tumors are ever more frequent. Consequently, there is a growing need to reconstruct longer and larger portions of skeletal segments. Resected bone tissue can be restored by various techniques:

  1. 1.

    Through the use of prostheses which, however, are contraindicated for benign tumors or in young patients

  2. 2.

    Through the use of donor transplants which, however, can create problems of histocompatibility, delays in consolidation, infection, and serious fractures

  3. 3.

    Through the use of autografts (the most frequently used method), which, however, produce a weakening in the limb at the donor site, increase the risk of infection at the reconstruction site, lengthen surgical times, and, by their very nature limit bone stock availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Katthagen BD (1987) Bone regeneration with bone substitutes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop 74: 28–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferraro JW (1979) Experimental evaluation of ceramic calcium phosphate as a substitute for bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 63 (5): 634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Flatley TJ, Lynch KL, Benson M (1983) Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramic in the rabbit spine. Clin Orthop 179: 246–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S (1987) Natural history of autografts and allografts. Clin Orthop 225: 7–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lange T A, Zerwekh JE, Peek RD, Mooney V, Harrison BH (1987) Granular tricalcium phosphate in large cancellous defects. Ann Clin Lab Sci 16(6): 467–472

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manili M, Mattioli V, Tomei S, Santori FS (1989) Studio sperimentale e clinico sulla associazione di innesti ossei autoplastici con biomateriali osteoinduttivi nelle ricostuzioni ossee. Abstract of the XIV Congr Naz Soc Ital Ric Chir. Catania 16–18 March 1989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ghera, S., Manili, M., Astolfi, M., Stopponi, M., Santori, F.S. (1991). Reconstruction of Bone Defects. In: Langlais, F., Tomeno, B. (eds) Limb Salvage. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75881-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75879-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics