Advertisement

Sound Cues to Distance: The Perception of Range

  • P. K. McGregor

Abstract

A major theme of this book is that the perceptual abilities of a species have evolved in relation to the specific demands of information gathering in the species’ environment. It follows, therefore, that we must identify the nature of the information that is important and salient to the study species when exploring its perceptual and sensory abilities. Without such information it will be difficult to design appropriate experiments and to interpret the capabilities which they reveal.

Keywords

Song Type Acoustic Communication Test Male Behav Ecol Playback Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brémond JC (1968) Recherches sur la sémantique et les elements vecteurs d’information dans les signaux acoustiques du rougegorge (Erithacus rubecula L.). Terre Vie 2: 109–220Google Scholar
  2. Brémond JC, Aubin T (1992) The role of amplitude modulation in distress-call recognition by the blackheaded gull Larus ridibundus. Ethol Ecol Evol 4: 187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brindley EL (1991) Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping. Anim Behav 41: 503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brindley EL (1992) Variation in Robin (Erithacus rubecula) song: Effects of season, sex and habitat acoustics. Thesis, University of Nottingham, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooke M, Birkhead TR (1991) The Cambridge encyclopedia of ornithology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Chappius C (1971) Un example de l’influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des oiseaux: l’évolution des chants on forêt équatoriale. Terre Vie 25: 183–202Google Scholar
  7. Cosens SE, Falls JB (1984) A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15: 161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dabelsteen T (1992) Interactive playback: a finely tuned response. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 97–110Google Scholar
  9. Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (1991) A portable digital sound emitter for interactive playback of animal vocalizations. Bioacoustics 3: 193–206Google Scholar
  10. Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pedersen SB (1993) Habitat induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effect of communication sounds and bird location on blurring, excess attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 2206–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Shepherd M, Whittaker X, Pedersen SB (1993) Overlapping and signalling in interactive playback experiments (submitted)Google Scholar
  12. Dawkins MS (1986) Unravelling animal behaviour. Longman, Harlow, EssexGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawkins MS, Guilford T (1991) The corruption of honest signalling. Anim Behav 41: 865–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falls JB (1982) Individual recognition by sounds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Evolution and ecology of acoustic communication in birds, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 237–278Google Scholar
  15. Falls JB, Krebs JR (1975) Sequences of songs in repertoires of western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta). Can J Zool 53: 1165–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falls JB, Krebs JR, McGregor PK (1982) Song matching in the Great tit (Parus major): the effect of similarity and familiarity. Anim Behav 30: 997–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gill FB (1990) Ornithology, Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Gish SL, Morton ES (1981) Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina Wren songs. Z Tierpsychol 56: 74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Handford P (1988) Trill rate dialects in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in northwestern Argentina. Can J Zool 66: 2658–2670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen P (1979) Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation and a hypothesis on its evolution. Anim Behav 27: 1270–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoelzel AR (1986) Song characteristics and response to playback of male and female robins, Erithacus rubecula. Ibis 128: 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horn AG, Falls JB (1988) Repertoires and countersinging in western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta). Ethology 77: 337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter ML, Krebs JR (1979) Geographical variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. J Anim Ecol 48: 759–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1987) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 111–133Google Scholar
  26. Krebs JR, Dawkins R (1984) Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 380–402Google Scholar
  27. Krebs JR, Kroodsma DE (1980) Repertoires and geographical variation in bird song. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Beer C, Busnell M-C (eds) Advances in the study of behaviour, vol 11. Academic Press, New York, pp 143–177Google Scholar
  28. Krebs JR, Ashcroft R, van Orsdol K (1981) Song matching in the great tit ( Parus major L. ). Anim Behav 29: 918–923Google Scholar
  29. Lambrechts M, Dhondt A A (1987) Differences in singing performance between male great tits. Ardea 75: 43–52Google Scholar
  30. Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 271–290Google Scholar
  31. Marten K, Quine D, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 291–302Google Scholar
  32. McGregor PK (1989) Pro-active memory interference in neighbour recognition by a song bird. Int Ornithol Congr XIX: 1391–1397Google Scholar
  33. McGregor PK (1991a) The singer and the song: on the receiving end of bird song. Biol Rev 66: 57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGregor PK (1991b) The Loughborough Sound Images speech workstation: spectrum analysis for a PC. Bioacoustics 3: 223–234Google Scholar
  35. McGregor PK (1992) Quantifying responses to playback: one, many or multivariate composite measures? In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  36. McGregor PK, Avery MI (1986) The unsung songs of great tits (Parus major): learning neighbours’ songs for discrimination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18: 311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGregor PK, Falls JB (1984) The response of Western Meadowlarks ( Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of degraded and undegraded songs. Can J Zool 62: 2125–2128Google Scholar
  38. McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1982) Song types in a population of great tits: their distribution abundance and acquisition by individuals. Behaviour 52: 126–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1984) Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit ( Parus major) song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16: 49–56Google Scholar
  40. McGregor PK, Krebs JR, Ratcliffe LM (1983) The response of great tits (Parus major) to the playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type. Auk 100: 898–906Google Scholar
  41. McGregor PK, Dabelsteen T, Shepherd M, Pedersen SB (1992) The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments. Anim Behav 43: 987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meddis R (1984) Statistics using ranks. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Michelsen A (1978) Sound perception in different environments. In: Ali MA (ed) Perspectives in sensory ecology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 345–373Google Scholar
  44. Michelsen A (1992) Hearing and sound communication in small animals: Evolutionary adaptations to the laws of physics. In: Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) The evolutionary biology of hearing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioural physiology. Roots and growing points. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 321–331Google Scholar
  46. Morton ES (1970) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Thesis, Yale University, NewhavenGoogle Scholar
  47. Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109: 17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morton ES (1980) The ecological background for the evolution of vocal sounds used at close range. Int Ornithol Congr XVII: 737–741Google Scholar
  49. Morton ES (1982) Grading, discreteness, redundancy and motivational-structural rules. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Evolution and ecology of acoustic communication in birds, vol. I. Academic Press, New York, pp 183–212Google Scholar
  50. Morton ES (1986) Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour 99: 65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nottebohm F (1975) Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: some possible ecological correlates. Am Nat 109: 605–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pedersen SB, Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON (1993) A digital technique for noise-compensated quantification of the degradation of transmitted sounds signals, (submitted)Google Scholar
  53. Potts WK (1984) The chorus-line hypothesis of manoeuvre coordination in avian flocks. Nature 309: 344–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richards DG (1981) Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina wren. Auk 98: 127–133Google Scholar
  55. Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115: 381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Römer H (1992) Ecological constraints for the evolution of hearing and sound communication in insects. In: Webster DB, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) The evolutionary biology of hearing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schroeder DJ, Wiley RH (1983) Communication with shared themes in tufted titmice. Auk 100: 414–424Google Scholar
  58. Shy E, Morton ES (1986) The role of distance, familiarity, and time of day in Carolina wrens responses to conspecific songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19: 393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shy E, McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1986) Discrimination of song types by male great tits. Behav Proc 13: 1–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith WJ (1977) The behavior of communicating: an ethological approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  61. Weary DM (1988) Experimental studies on the song of the great tit. Thesis, University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Weary DM (1992) Bird song and operant experiments: a new tool to investigate song perception. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 201–210Google Scholar
  63. Weary DM, Krebs JR (1992) Great tits classify songs by individual voice characteristics. Anim Behav 43: 282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wiley RH, Godard R (1992) Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers Opororrtis formosus reduces the possibilities for interference in territorial interactions. Abstr IVth Int Behav Ecol Congr T54c. Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3: 69–94Google Scholar
  66. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Evolution and ecology of acoustic communication in birds, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. McGregor
    • 1
  1. 1.Behaviour and Ecology Research Group, Department of Life ScienceUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations