An early paper by Code (1937) describes histamine bioassays as “… methods involving as their final test one or more of the physiological responses to histamine to determine the tissue histamine equivalent”. Historically, the popularity of histamine determination by bioassays is twofold in origin, and stems from the favourable biological versus unfavourable chemical characteristics of histamine. Since its discovery (Dale and Laidlaw 1910), histamine has been found to be endowed with powerful biological effects, in contrast to its lack of useful light absorption or emission properties (Lewis et al. 1933). Consequently, satisfactory recovery for quantitative biological titration was possible, due to the high sensitivity of the final assays, while non-biological methods of measurement had to be based upon the properties of derivatives prepared by various chemical reactions, with unsatisfactory recovery for quantitative chemical titration.
KeywordsTitration Serotonin Histamine Prostaglandin Noradrenaline
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Büttner J, Borth R, Boutwell HJ, Broughton PMG, Bowyer RC (1980) Approved recommendation (1978) on quality control in clinical chemistry. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 18:78–88Google Scholar
- Gaddum JH (1953a) The technique of superfusion. Br J Pharmacol 8:321–326Google Scholar
- Koessler KK, Hanke MT (1919) A microchemical colorimetric method for estimating imidazole derivatives. J Biol Chem 39:497–505Google Scholar
- Schultz WH (1911) Reaction of smooth muscle from guinea pigs rendered tolerant to large doses of serum. J Pharmacol 2:221–229Google Scholar
- Shore PA, Burkhalter A, Cohn VH (1959) A method for the fluorimetric assay of histamine in tissue. J Pharmacol 127:182–186Google Scholar
- Vugman I, Rocha e Silva M (1966) Biological determination of histamine in living tissue and body fluids. In: Rocha e Silva M (ed) Histamine and anti-histaminics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 80–115 (Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol 18/1)Google Scholar