Skip to main content

Quality of Life, Clinical Trials, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Conceptual Issues with Hypertension as an Example

  • Chapter
Costs and Benefits in Health Care and Prevention
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

In the minds of many health researchers, quality of life assessment is still a marketing gimmick: a newfangled outcome measure which can be tacked onto a traditional clinical trial. Inclusion of these trendy instruments shows concern for the “softer” values in therapy on the part of the investigator or sponsor and, with a little luck, might actually demonstrate a difference favoring the experimental group. Such a narrow view does not reflect the maturity of today’s quality of life assessment techniques. More importantly, it fails to acknowledge the central importance of patients’ values in health care decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Read, J.L. (1988): The new era of quality of life assessment. In: Walker, SR., Rosser, R.M. (eds): Quality of life: assessment and application. MTP Press Limited, Lancaster Boston The Hague Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  2. Read, J.L. (1988): From medical to socioeconomic evaluation of drug therapy. In: Eimeren van W., Horisbert, B (eds): Socioeconomic evaluation of drug therapy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Read, J.L. (1988): Health outcomes should be viewed as an area under the curve. Drug Information Journal 22 (23): 395–406

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick, D.L., Bush, J.W., Chen, M.M. (1973): Toward an operational definition of health. J Health Soc Behav 14: 6–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan, R..M., Bush, J.W., Berry, C.C. (1976): Health Status: Types of validity for an index of well- being. Health Serv Res 11: 478–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan, R.M., Bush, J.W. (1982): Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol 1: 61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan, R.M., Anderson, J.P., Wu, A., Kozin, F., Orenstein, D. (1988): The quality of well-being scale: applications in aids, cystic fibrosis and arthritis. In: Advances in Health Status Assessment Conference, Menlo Park CA February 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Balaban, D.J., Fagi, P.C., Goldfarb, N.I., Nettler, S. (1986): Weights for scoring the quality of well- being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. Med Care 24 (11): 973–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Read, J.L., Quinn, R.J., Hoeffer, M.A. (1987): Measuring overall health: An evaluation of three important approaches. J Chron Dis 40: 7S–21S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. Washington DC: American Psychological Association 1974

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein, M.C., Feinberg, H. (1980): Clinical decision analysis. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein, M.C., Stason, W.B. (1976): Hypertension: A policy perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Read, J.L. (1990). Quality of Life, Clinical Trials, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Conceptual Issues with Hypertension as an Example. In: Laaser, U., Roccella, E.J., Rosenfeld, J.B., Wenzel, H. (eds) Costs and Benefits in Health Care and Prevention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75781-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75781-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-52708-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75781-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics