Some Common Problems and Pitfalls in Intraoperative Monitoring of Evoked Potentials

  • A. R. Møller
Conference paper

Summary

This chapter reviews and suggests remedies for some of the common problems and pitfalls that may be encountered when sensory evoked potentials are recorded in the operating room to monitor the auditory and somatosensory system, and when electromyographic potentials are recorded intraoperatively for monitoring of cranial motor nerves.

In a new discipline such as that encompassing the use of evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring, problems and pitfalls are many. Therefore this chapter naturally cannot provide complete coverage of what can go wrong in the operating room and how recordings can be misinterpreted, but it must instead focus on a small sample of the problems that can be encountered by the neurophysiologist performing intraoperative monitoring of evoked potentials.

Keywords

Retina Assure Dial Stim Neuroma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cedzich C, Schramm J, Mengedoht CF, Fahlbusch R (1988) Factors that limit the use of flash visual evoked potentials for surgical monitoring. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 71: 142–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiappa KH (1983) Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Levine RA, Ojemann RG, Montgomery WW, McGaffigan PM (1984) Monitoring auditory evoked potentials during acoustic neuroma surgery. Insights into the mechanisms of hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93: 116–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lueders H, Gurd A, Hahn J, Andrish J, Weiker G, Klem G (1982) A new technique for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function: Multichannel recording of spinal cord and subcortical evoked potentials. Spine 7: 110–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lueders H, Lesser R, Hahn J, Little J, Klem G (1983) Subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation. Brain 106: 341–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Møller AR (1987) Electrophysiological monitoring of cranial nerves in operations in the skull base. In Sekhar LN, Schramm VL (eds) Tumors of the Cranial Base: Diagnosis and Treatment. Futura Publ., Mt. Kisco, New York, pp 123–132Google Scholar
  7. Møller AR (1988a) Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Monitoring. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  8. Møller AR (1988b) Use of zero-phase digital filters to enhance brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 71: 226–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1983) Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg 59: 493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1984) Preservation of facial function during removal of acoustic neuromas: Use of monopolar constant-voltage stimulation and EMG. J Neurosurg 61: 757–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ojemann RG, Levine RA, Montgomery WM, McGaffigan PM (1984) Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal. J Neurosurg 61: 938–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sekhar LN, Møller AR (1986) Operative management of tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 64: 879–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Møller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations