Intraoperative Monitoring of Evoked Potentials in Microvascular Decompression Operations: Influence on Surgical Strategy

  • P. J. Jannetta
Conference paper


Neurophysiologic monitoring of patients during microvascular decompression (MVD) operations to treat cranial nerve disorders in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) has become essential not only to the decrease in morbidity of these operations that now makes them a desirable option for patients with disorders such as hemifacial spasm and trigeminal neuralgia, but in some cases to the efficient completion of the procedure itself.

Because the surgeon must devote primary attention to events in the operative field, monitoring of evoked potentials during operations in the CPA must be the primary responsibility of another professional on the surgical team. When the electrophysiologist and the surgeon establish a collaborative relationship so that they communicate well and coordinate their efforts, solutions can be found to the many problems that arise during the performance and monitoring of surgical maneuvers in the CPA.

Specific situations in which intraoperative monitoring facilitates the surgical goals of MVD, and ways in which the surgical strategy may be altered because of monitoring, are discussed.


Cranial Nerve Facial Nerve Trigeminal Nerve Trigeminal Neuralgia Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett MH, Jannetta PJ (1980) Trigeminal evoked potentials in humans. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 48: 517–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett MH, Jannetta PJ (1983) Evoked potentials in trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 13: 242–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grundy BL, Lina A, Procopio PT, Jannetta PJ (1981) Reversible evoked potential changes with retraction of the eighth cranial nerve. Anesth Analg 60: 835–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jannetta PJ (1977) Observations on the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, acoustic nerve dysfunction, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Definite microsurgical treatment and results in 117 patients. Neurochirurgie (Paris) 20: 145–154Google Scholar
  5. Jannetta PJ (1981a) Trigeminal neuralgia. In Samii M, Jannetta PJ (eds) The Cranial Nerves, Springer, New York, pp 331–340Google Scholar
  6. Jannetta PJ (1981b) Hemifacial spasm. In Samii M, Jannetta PJ (eds) The Cranial Nerves, Springer, New York, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  7. Jannetta PJ (1984) Hemifacial spasm caused by a venule: Case report. Neurosurgery 14: 89–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1983) Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg 59: 493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1987) Monitoring facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression operations for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 66: 681–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Møller AR (1988) Evoked Potentials in Intraoperative Monitoring. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  11. Møller AR, Møller MB (1989) Does intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials reduce incidence of hearing loss as a complication of microvascular decompression of cranial nerves? Neurosurgery 24: 257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Jannetta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations