Summary
Monitoring personnel should consider techniques to be flexible. A variety of options are available for specific evoked potential (EP) techniques. Somewhat different techniques should be applied whenever monitoring situations require such variation in technique. Informed users should understand the various ways in which such flexibility of technique can be helpful.
Stimulus site, type, rate, recording site, filter, and other technical parameters can be altered to best suit a particular patient’s circumstances. Averaging can also be performed in several ways. During the baseline portion of an operation, the monitoring team should choose the technique that best suits the particular patient and procedure.
Artifacts and other technical problems are common in the operating room. The monitoring personnel should understand their own equipment and the artifacts present in the operating room so that they can identify the technical problems and minimize them. The monitoring team can assess the adequacy of their own recordings by applying some general quality-assurance standards, assessing reproducibility, and noisiness of the recordings. The overall technical goal of monitoring should be the rapid production of high-quality EP signals, while minimizing baseline variability in latency and amplitude of the major EP peaks. Knowledgeable users should be able to achieve this technical goal in most cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Harper CM, Daube, J (1989) Surgical monitoring with evoked potentials: The Mayo Clinic experience. In Desmedt JE (ed) Neuromonitoring in Surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–301
Jones SJ, Edgar MA, Ransford AO (1982) Sensory nerve conduction in the human spinal cord: Epidural recordings made during scoliosis surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 45: 446–451
Levine AL (1988) Surgical monitoring applications of the brainstem auditory evoked response and electrocochleography. In Owen JH, Donohoe CD (eds) Clinical Atlas of Auditory Evoked Potentials. Grune & Stratton, Orlando, Florida, pp 103–116
Lueders H, Gurd A, Hahn J, Andrish J, Weiker G, Klem G (1982) A new technique for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function: Multichannel recording of spinal cord and subcortical evoked potentials. Spine 7: 110–115
Molaie M (1986) False negative intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials with simultaneous bilateral stimulation. Clin Electroenceph 17: 6–9
Nuwer MR (1986) Evoked Potential Monitoring in the Operating Room. Raven Press, New York
Nuwer MR, Dawson E (1984a) Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord: Enhanced stability of cortical recordings. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 59: 318–327
Nuwer MR, Dawson E (1984b) Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord: A restricted filter, scalp method during Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis. Clin Orthop 183: 42–50
Sgro J A, Emerson RG, Pedley TA (1985) Real-time reconstruction of evoked potentials using a new two-dimensional filter method. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 62: 372–380
Tamaki T, Tsuji H, Inoue S, Kobayashi H (1981) The prevention of iatrogenic spinal cord injury utilizing the evoked spinal cord potential. Int Orthop 4: 313–317
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nuwer, M.R. (1991). Technical Parameters, Artifacts, and Quality Assessment of Intraoperative Evoked Potentials. In: Schramm, J., Møller, A.R. (eds) Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Neurosurgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75750-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75750-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75752-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75750-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive