Prototypical Features of the Inhibitory Synapses in the Frog Spinal Cord as Revealed Pharmacologically
Inhibitory synapses of the spinal cord modulate excitatory synaptic transmission and control the tones of agonistic and antagonistic muscles to ensure smooth movements of limbs and fingers. Thus terrestrial vertebrates which are destined to move with their limbs under high gravity are expected to have well organized inhibitory synapses as well as excitatory ones. During studies on the functions of inhibitory synapses in the spinal cord of frog, which is the most primitive terrestrial vertebrate, we encountered many prototypical features. For instance bicuculline and strychnine, well-known antagonists for GABA and glycine in mammalian central nervous system, respectively, showed little antagonism of the GABA- and glycine-induced membrane potential changes in amphibians . Interestingly, we found that these drugs block the effect of taurine which exerts biphasic effects on primary afferent terminals . We have also found that diazepam did not influence GABA binding on synaptic membranes prepared from frog spinal cord . Taurine seems to be a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the spinal cord of this species. These results give the impression that the inhibitory systems in frog spinal cord are prototypical as compared with those in mammalian central nervous system.
KeywordsSucrose Polyethylene Glycine CaCl Alanine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Braestrup C, Honore T, Nielsen M, Petersen EN, Jensen LH (1983) Benzodiazepine receptor ligands with negative efficacy chloride channel coupling. Ad Biochem Psychpharmacol 38: 29–36Google Scholar
- 3.Krnjevic K (1979) Inhibitory action of GABA and GABA-mimetics on vertebrate neurons. In: Roberts E, Chase TN, Tower DB (eds) GABA in nervous system function. Raven Press New York pp 269–281Google Scholar
- 9.Sturman JA, Gaull GE (1976) Taurine in the brain and liver of the development human and Rhesus monkey. In: Huxtable R, Barbeau A (eds) Taurine. Raven Press, New York pp 73–84Google Scholar