Skip to main content

Motor Evoked Potentials: Issues in Safety and Operative Monitoring

  • Conference paper
Book cover Spinal Cord Monitoring and Electrodiagnosis
  • 103 Accesses

Abstract

The monitoring of the motor system is an important goal for spinal cord evaluation. Ideally we need a safe procedure, easily used, reliable, and able to indicate problems with the upper or lower motor neuron pathways. Until a few years ago little was available in such a direction. However, the advent of both spinal cord stimulation and transcranial motor pathway stimulation has offered the opportunity to develop such testing. A particularly useful type of transcranial stimulation in the awake patient is the magnetic stimulator, first described in 1985 by Dr. Anthony Barker. This stimulator was initially limited by the large surface area of brain which it stimulated, and by the fact that it was just powerful enough to stimulate awake patients. Therefore it was often not reliable on an anesthetized patient with a higher stimulus threshold. The technology of these devices is evolving rapidly, and more powerful stimulators are being tested by Novametrix and Cadwell Labs, as well as some other groups. The one which has been initially evaluated for the operating room is the Cadwell MES-10. This can stimulate patients in the operating room under some conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnew, McCreery (1987) Safety in transcranial stimulation. Neurosurgery 20 (1): 100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet i: 1106–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridge SL, Delaney RC (1989) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: An Assessment of Cognitive and other cerebral effects. Neurology 39: 417–419, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown Rh, Nash CL, Lorig RA, Schatzinger LA (1977) Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine. Clin Orthop 126: 100–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edmunds HL, Paloheimo MPJ, Backman M, Johnson JR, Holt RT, Schields CB (1989) Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tcMMEP) for functional monitoring of motor pathways during scholiosis surgery. Spine 14: 683–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy WJ (1987) SEP vs MEP debate: the monitoring of motor pathways. Clin Neurosurg 34: 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levy WJ, McCaffrey M, York DH, Tanzer F (1984) Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. Neurosurgery 15: 214–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levy WJ, McCaffrey M, York DH, Tanzer F (1984) Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in cats. Neurosurgery 15: 287–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy WJ, Oro J, Tucker D (1989) Safety studies of electrical and magnetic stimulation for the production of motor evoked potentials. In: Magnetic stimulation in clinical neurophysiology. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moller AR (1987) Electrophysiological monitoring of cranial nerves in operations in the skull base. In: Sekar LN, Schramm V (eds) Tumors of the cranial base: diagnosis and treatment. Futura, Mt. Kisco

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1984) Preservation of facial nerve function during removal of acoustic neuromas. Use of monopolar constantp-voltage stimulation adn EMG. J Neurosurg 61: 757–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Monitoring of facial nerve function during removal of acoustic tumor. Am J Otol [November Suppl]: 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prass R, Luders H (1986) Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring Part 1. Neurosurgery 19: 392–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Raudzens PA (1982) Intraoperative monitoring of evoked potentials. In: BodisWollner I (ed) Evoked potentials. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 308–325

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Levy, W.J., Oro, J., Traad, M. (1991). Motor Evoked Potentials: Issues in Safety and Operative Monitoring. In: Shimoji, K., Kurokawa, T., Tamaki, T., Willis, W.D. (eds) Spinal Cord Monitoring and Electrodiagnosis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75744-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75744-0_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75746-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75744-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics