Evoked Potential Patterns in Chronic Spinal Cord Lesions

  • M. Sarzyńska
  • I. Haftek
  • J. Haftek
Conference paper

Abstract

Evoked potential recordings are widely used for evaluation of the central nervous system status. They seem to be particularly useful in evaluating spinal cord function in acute and chronic spinal cord lesions (Wise 1984, Rowed 1982, Greenberg and Ducker 1982). Moreover, SEP have been proved to be an early detector of disturbances of spinal cord function during surgeries (Schramm 1985).

Keywords

Ischemia Astrocytoma Dura Paraplegia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deecke L, Tator CH (1973) Neurophysiological assessment of afferent and efferent conduction in the injured spinal cord of monkeys. J Neurosurg 39: 65–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodman R, Wachs K, Keller S, Black P (1985) Spontaneous spinal cord “injury potential” in the rat. Neurosurgery 17: 757–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenberg RP, Ducker TB (1982) Evoked potentials in clinical neurosciences. J Neurosurg 56: 1–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowed DW (1982) Value of somatosensory evoked potentials for prognosis in partial cord injuries. In: Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schramm J (1985) Spinal cord monitoring: current status and new developments. Central Nervous System Trauma 3: 207–227Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schramm J, Hashizume K, Fukushima T, Takahashi H (1979) Experimental spinal cord injury produced by slow, graded compression. J Neurosurg 50: 48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schramm J, Shigeno T, Brock M (1983a) Clinical signs and evoked response alterations associated with chronic experimental cord compression. J Neurosurg 58: 734–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schramm J, Krause R, Shigeno T (1983b) Experimental investigation on the spinal cord evoked injury potential. J Neurosurg 59: 485–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shinomiya KI, Furuya K, Yamamura I, Kaneda A, Yokoyama M (1985) Clinical study of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using evoked spinal cord potentials. In: Schramm J, Jones SJ (eds) Spinal cord monitoring Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 290–301Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stegeman DF, Van Oosterom A, Colon EJ (1987) Far field components induced by a propagating generator: computational evidence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67: 176–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tamaki T, Noguchi T, Takano H, Tsuji H, Nakagawa T, Imai K, Inoue S (1984) Spinal cord monitoring as a clinical utilization of the spinal evoked potential. Clin Orthop 184: 58–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Young W (1982) Correlation of somatosensory evoked potentials and neurological findings in spinal cord injury. In: Tator CH (ed) Early management of acute spinal cord injury. Raven Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sarzyńska
    • 1
  • I. Haftek
  • J. Haftek
  1. 1.Electrophysiological Lab.Metropolitan Rehabilitation CenterKonstancinPoland

Personalised recommendations