Advertisement

Electrophysiological Differentiation Between Muscle and Sensory Nerve Funiculi for Peripheral Nerve Repair

  • N. Nakata
  • H. Matsuda
  • A. Miyauchi
  • M. Seki
  • A. Shimazu
Conference paper

Summary

The purpose of this investigation was to differentiate the muscle funiculi from the sensory funiculi in the proximal stump of the peripheral nerve. Five cats anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital were used. An epidural electrode was inserted under the C7 lamina and needle electrodes were inserted at disc spaces C2–3, C3–4, C4–5 and C5–6. The amplitude of cortical somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) induced by stimulation of the superficial radial nerve, which has a sensory function, was usually larger than that of the deep radial nerve, which has a motor function. When a stimulus of less than 1.9 mA was applied through the needle electrode at the C5-6 disc space, a spike component suggesting orthodromic passage along the motor fibers was observed only from the muscle nerve. More intense stimulation (5.7 mA) under C7 lamina elicited two components from the sensory branch. The second component was almost completely abolished after intravenous injection of 0.5 mg/kg picrotoxin, hence it was considered to be the dorsal root reflex. Especially at C4–5 and C5–6 disc spaces, the amplitude of the positive component subsequent to the first negative component upon stimulation of the sensory nerve was higher than that following stimulation of the muscle nerve. These experiments may be clinically applicable to surgery of the funicular suture.

Keywords

Disc Space Radial Nerve Needle Electrode Sensory Evoke Potential Proximal Stump 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruber H et al. (1976) Identification of motor and sensory funiculi in cut nerves and their selective re-union. Br J Plast Surg 29: 70–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hakstian RW (1968) Funicular orientation by direct stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg 50-A: 1178–1186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halonen JP, Jones S, Shawkat F (1988) Contribution of cutaneous and muscle afferent fibers to cortical SEPs following median and radial nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71: 331–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashimoto T et al. (1980) Experimental study on the identification of sensory branch of the proximal stump at the site of nerve suture. Orthopedic Surgery 31: 1371–1374 (Jpn)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kondo N (1979) Clinical Study of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Orthopaedic Surgery. Int Orthop (SICOT) 1: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsuda H et al (1981) Funicular identification of a muscle-branch for the nerve repair; clinical application of somatosensory evoked potential. Orthopedic Surgery 32: 1594–1596 (Jpn)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sunderland S (1953) Funicular suture and funicular exclusion in the repair of severed nerves. Br J Surg 40: 580–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Nakata
    • 1
  • H. Matsuda
  • A. Miyauchi
  • M. Seki
  • A. Shimazu
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryOsaka City University Medical SchoolAbeno-ku, Osaka, 545Japan

Personalised recommendations