Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Duodenal Ulcer Disease

  • Conference paper
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

It is clear from the literature that many factors contribute to peptic ulcer disease. Whilst it would be convenient to attribute the aetiology of duodenal ulcer (DU) to a single factor, there can be little doubt that this is a multifactorial disease, not only for a given population, but also probably for the majority of individual sufferers. This makes it particularly difficult to unravel the different factors, so that the aetiology of peptic ulcer disease is still unknown. It follows that, although treatments are improving dramatically, ignorance of its aetiology has meant that it is still impossible to cure peptic ulcer disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Graham DY (1989) Campylobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterology 96:615–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnevie O (1985) Changing demographics of peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci 30:(11):85–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawai K, Shirakawa K, Misaki F, Hayashi K, Watanabe Y (1989) Natural history and epidemiologic studies of peptic ulcer disease in Japan. Gastroenterology 96:581–585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaneko E, Ooi S, Ito G, Honda N (1989) Natural history of duodenal ulcer detected by the gastric mass surveys in men over 40 years of age. Scand J Gastroenterol 24:165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Somerville K, Faulkner G, Langman M (1986) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bleeding peptic ulcer. Lancet I:462–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walt R, Katschinski B, Logan R, Ashley J, Langman M (1986) Rising frequency of ulcer perforation in elderly people in the United Kingdom. Lancet I::489–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurata JH, Honda GD, Frankl H (1982) Hospitalization and mortality rates for peptic ulcers: a comparison of a large health maintenance organization and United States data. Gastroenterology 83:1008–1016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurata JH (1989) Ulcer epidemiology: an overview and proposed research framework. Gastroenterology 96:569–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Khuroo MS, Mahajan R, Zargar SA, Javid G, Munshi S (1989) Prevalence of peptic ulcer in India: an endoscopic and epidemiological study in urban Kashmir. Gut 30:930–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tovey FI, Tunstall M (1975) Duodenal ulcer in black populations in Africa south of the Sahara. Gut 16:564–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mengistu M (1983) The diagnosis of duodenal ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia on the basis of symptomatology. In: Tsega E (ed) Non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastritis in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Research and Publications Office, Addis Ababa University

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kang JY, Labrooy SJ, Yap I, Guan R, Lim K, Math V, Tay HH (1987) Racial differences in peptic ulcer frequency in Singapore. J Gastroent Hepatology 2:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tovey FI (1979) Peptic ulcer in India and Bangladesh. Gut 20:329–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rydning A, Berstad A (1986) Dietary fibre and peptic ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 21:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant HW, Palmer KR, Kelly RW, Wilson NH (1988) Dietary linoleic acid, gastric acid, and prostaglandin secretion. Gastroenterology 94:955–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tovey FI, Jayaraj AP, Lewin MR, Clark CG (1989) Diet: its role in the genesis of peptic ulceration. Dig Dis 7:309–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Langman MJS (1987) The changing face of peptic ulceration. Scand J Gastroenterol 22 [Suppl. 136]::37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dwyer B, Nanxiong S, Kaldor J et al (1988) Antibody response to Campylobacter pylori in an ethnic group lacking peptic ulceration. Scand J Infect Dis 20:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rouvroy D, Bogaerts J, Nsengium O, Omar M (1987) Campylobacter pylori, gastritis and peptic ulcer disease in central Africa. Br Med J 295:1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lachlan GW, Gilmour H, Jass JJ (1988) Campylobacter in Central Africa. Br Med J 296:66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wyatt JI, De Caestecker J, Rathbone BJ, Heatley RV (1987) Campylobacter pyloridis in tropical Africa. Gut 28:A1409

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yong-yi Feng, Ya Wang (1988) Campylobacter pylori in patients with gastritis, peptic ulcer, and carcinoma of the stomach in Lanzhou, China. Lancet I:1055–1056

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Colin-Jones, D.G. (1991). Epidemiology of Duodenal Ulcer Disease. In: Menge, H., Gregor, M., Tytgat, G.N.J., Marshall, B.J., McNulty, C.A.M. (eds) Helicobacter pylori 1990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75726-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75726-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75728-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75726-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics