Advertisement

In Vitro Chromosomal Aberration Test — Current Status

  • M. IshidateJr.

Abstract

The majority of chemical mutagens and/or carcinogens interact with cellular DNA and are extremely potent in inducing chromosome damage in mammalian cells. A recent review of chromosomal aberration tests in vitro, on 951 chemical substances, from over 240 published papers indicated that about 93% (91/98) of well-known carcinogens were positive (clastogenic) in the system with or without metabolic activation, using either primary cultured cells or established cell line cells (Ishidate et al. 1988). Of the substances which were positive in the gene mutation assays in bacteria (Ames test), about 97% (176/181) were also positive in the chromosome test, while of those negative in the Ames test, about 90% (122/135) were positive in the chromosome test (Table 1).

Keywords

Chromosomal Aberration Chinese Hamster Ovary Ames Test Micronucleus Test Polyploid Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashby J, de Serres FJ, Draper M, Ishidate M Jr, Margolin BH, Matter BE, Shelby MD (1985) Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens. Progress in mutation research vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–174Google Scholar
  2. Barry DJ, Litchfield MH (1985) A review of the current regulatory requirements for mutagenicity testing. In: Ashby J, de Serres JF et al. (eds) Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens. Mutation Research vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 727–740Google Scholar
  3. Cifone MA, Myhr B, Eiche A, Bolcsfoldi G (1987) Effect of pH shifts on the mutant frequency at the thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK+/- cells. Mutat Res 189: 39–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans H, O’Riordan ML (1975) Human peripheral blood lymphocytes for the analysis of chromo-some aberrations in mutagen tests. Mutat Res 31: 135–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans HJ, Ishidate M Jr., Leng M, Miller CT, Mitelman F, Vogel E (1980) Cytogenetic damage as an endpoint in short-term assay systems for detecting environmental carcinogens, Reprt 8, in long-term and short-term screening assays for carcinogens: a critical appraisal. IARC/WHO Monograph, Suppl 2,1 ARC, Lyon, pp 227–244Google Scholar
  6. Galloway SM, Bloom AD, Resnich M, Margolin BH, Nakamura F, Archer P, Zeiger E (1985) Development of a standard protocol for in vitro cytogenetic testing with Chinese hamster overy cells: comparison of results from 22 compounds in two laboratories. Environ Mutagen 7: 1–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galloway SM, Armstrong MT, Reuben S et al. (1987) Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells: evaluations of 108 chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 10: 1–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ISCN (1985) An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Birth Defeats: Original Article Series, Vol 21, No 1, National Foundation -Merch of Dimes, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishidate M Jr (ed) (1988) Data book of chromosomal aberration tests in vitro. LIC/Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishidate M Jr, Sofuni T (1985) The in vitro chromosomal aberration test using Chinese hamster lung (CHL) fibroblast cells in culture. In: Ashby J, de Serres FJ et al. (eds) Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens. Progress in Mutation Research, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 427–432Google Scholar
  11. Ishidate M Jr, Sofuni T, Yoshikawa K, Hayashi M, Nohmi T, Sawada M, Matsuoka A (1984) Primaray mutagenicity screening of food additives currently used in Japan. Fd Chem Toxic 22: 623–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishidate M Jr, Harnois MC, Sofuni T (1988) A comparative analysis of data on the clastogenicity of 951 chemical substances tested in mammalian cell cultures. Mutat Res 195: 151–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Koyama H, Utakoji T, Ono T (1970) A new cell line derived from newborn Chinese hamster lung tissue. Gann 61: 161–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (1985) Requirements for safety evaluation of agricultural chemical. Plant Protection Division, Agricultural Production BureauGoogle Scholar
  15. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan (1986) Guidelines for screening, toxicity testings of chemicals, law concerning the examination and regulation of manufacture, etc. of chemical substances. Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Health and WelfareGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan (1984, 1989) Information on the guidelines of toxicity studies required for applications for approval to manufacture (import) drugs (part 1). Notification No. 118 of Pharmaceutical Affairs BureauGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Labour of Japan (1979) On the standards of the mutagenicity test using micro-organisms in the labour safety and hygiene law. Labour Standard BureauGoogle Scholar
  18. Natarajan AT, Tates AD, Buul PPW van, Meijers M, de Vogel N (1976) Cytogenetic effects of mutagens/carcinogens after activation in a microsomal system in vitro. Mutat Res 37: 83–90Google Scholar
  19. OECD (1988) Introduction to the OECD guidelines on genetic toxicology testing and guidance on the selection and application of assays, genetic toxicology. OECDGoogle Scholar
  20. Sawada M, Ishidate M Jr (1978) Colchicine-like effect of diethylstilbestrol (DES) on mammalian cells in vitro. Mutat Res 57: 175–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sofuni T, Matsuoka A, Sawada M, Ishidate M Jr, Zeiger E, Shelby MD (1989) A comparison of chromosome aberration induction in the CHO and CHL cell systems by 25 compounds, Mutat Res (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Thust R, Mendel J, Schwarz H, Warzok R (1980) Nitrosated urea pesticide metabolites and other nitrosamides. Activity in clastogenicity and SCE assays, and aberration kinetics in Chinese hamster V79-E cells. Mutat Res 79: 239–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. UKEMS Guideline (1983, 1989) Metaphase chromosome aberration assays in vitro. In: Scott D, Danford N, Dean B, Kirklan D, Richardson C (eds) UKEMSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. IshidateJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Genetics and MutagenesisNational Institute of Hygienic SciencesSetagaya-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations