Advertisement

Radio-Adaptive Response: A Novel Chromosomal Response in Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro

  • T. Ikushima

Abstract

When exposed to various DNA damaging stresses, a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells exhibit induction of an adaptation mechanism. The adaptive response was first reported by Samson and Cairns (1977) in Escherichia coli as an inducibile form of DNA repair acting on alkylation damage, in which the bacterial cells that had been exposed to low levels of alkylating agents became less susceptible to the subsequent high doses of the same and other compounds. In this adaptive response, the induction of adaptation proteins, DNA glycosylase and DNA alkyltransferase are involved (Karran et al. 1979; Evensen and Seeberg 1982), which is distinct from the SOS response, another inducible effect resulting from DNA damage (Jeggo et al. 1977). An analogous adaptive response has also been observed in some higher mammalian systems (e.g., Samson and Schwartz 1980; Laval and Laval 1984) and in higher plants (Rieger et al. 1982). Interestingly, the adaptive response has been recently found to occur in human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (Olivieri et al. 1984; Shadley and Wolff, 1987; Sankaranarayanan et al. 1989). A pretreatment with “conditioning” or “adapting” low doses of either tritium β-mys or X-rays resulted in a reduction in the yield of chromosomal aberrations induced by a subsequent (“challenge”) higher dose. Such a clastogenic radio-adaptive response has also been observed in the induction of micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in proliferative Chinese hamster V79 cells (Ikushima 1987, 1989), and of chromosomal aberrations in Vicia faba root tip cells (Heindorff et al. 1987). It is now clear that the radio-adaptive response can occur in cells from a rather universal range of eukaryotes. While the network of the adaptive response to alkylating agents in bacteria is well understood at the molecular level (for a review, see Lindahl et al. 1988), very little is known about the mechanisms responsible for the radio-adaptive response in higher eukaryotes.

Keywords

Adaptive Response Human Lymphocyte Sister Chromatid Exchange Relative Biological Effectiveness Reactor Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin RC, Gill DM (1980) Poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis in vitro programmed by damaged DNA. A comparison of DNA molecules containing different types of strand breaks. J Biol Chem 255: 10502–10508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosi A, Olilvieri G (1989) Variability of the adaptive response to ionizing radiations in humans. Mutat Res 211: 13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chatterjee S, Bhattacharjee SB, Bhattacharya N, Bhaunk G (1984) UV non-mutable mutant from V-79 Chinese hamster cells. Mol Gen Genet 193: 251–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Criessen D, Shall S (1982) Regulation of DNA ligase activity by poly(ADP-ribose). Nature 196: 271–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demple B, Haibrook J (1983) Inducible repair of oxidative DNA damage in Escherichia coli. Nature 304: 466–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eastman A (1983) Characterization of the aducts produced by cis-diamine dichloroplatinum(II) and cis-dichloro(ethylene-diamine) platinum(II). Biochemistry 22: 3927–3933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evensen G, Seeberg E (1982) Adaptation to alkylation resistance involves the induction of DNA glycosylase. Nature 296: 773–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haseltine WA (1983) Ultraviolet light repair and mutagenesis revisited. Cell 33: 13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heindorff K, Rieger R, Michaelis A, Takehisa S (1987) Clastogenic adaptation triggered by S-phase-independent clastogens in Vicia faba. Mutat Res 190: 131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ikushima T (1972) Relative biological effectiveness of heavy particles from the reaction 10B (n, α)7Li for cytogenetic effects in a ploidy series of the genus Triticum. Jpn J Genet 47: 401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ikushima T (1977) Role of sister chromatid exchanges in chromatid aberration formation. Nature 268: 325–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ikushima T (1987) Chromosomal response to ionizing radiation reminiscent of an adaptive response in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 180: 215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ikushima T (1989) Radio-adaptive response: characterization of a cytogenetic repair induced by low-level ionizing radiation in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 227: 241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikushima T, Wolff S (1974) Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxy-uridine and 5-iodo-deoxyuridine substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 87: 15–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeggo P, Defais M, Samson L, Schendel P (1977) An adaptive response of E. coli to low levels of alkylating agent: comparison with previously characterized DNA repair pathways. Mol Gen Genet 157: 1 - 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karran P, Lindahl T, Griffin B (1979) Adaptive response to alkylating agents involves alteration in situ of 06-methylguanine residues in DNA. Nature 280: 76–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laval F, Laval J (1984) Adaptive response in mammalian cells: crossreactivity of different pretreatments on cytotoxicity as contrasted to mutagenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1062–1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leenhouts HP, Broertjes C, Sijsma MS, Chadwick KH (1982) Radiation stimulated repair in Saint-paulia: its cellular basis and effect on mutation frequency. Environ Exp Bot 22: 301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindahl T, Sedgwick B, Sekiguchi M, Nakabeppu Y (1988) Regulation and expression of the adaptive response to alkylating agents. Annu Rev Biochem 57: 133–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olivieri G, Bodycote J, Wolff S (1984) Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science 223: 594–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa methods for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251: 156–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rieger R, Michaelis A, Nicoloff H (1982) Inducible repair processes in plant root tip meristems. “Below additivity effects” of unequally fractionated clastogen concentrations, Biol 101: 125–138Google Scholar
  23. Samson L, Cairns J (1977) A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Nature (Lond) 267: 281–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Samson L, Schwartz JL (1980) Evidence for an adaptive DNA repair pathway in CHO and human skin fibrobrast cell lines. Nature 287: 861–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanderson BJS, Morley A A (1986) Exposure of human lymphocytes to ionizing radiation reduces mutagenesis by subsequent ionizing radiation. Mutat Res 164: 347–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sankaranarayanan K, Duyn AV, Loos MJ, Natarajan AT (1989) Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low-level radiation from radioisotopes or X-rays. Mutat Res 211: 7–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shadley JD, Wiencke JK (1989) Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. Int J Radiat Biol 56: 107–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shadley JD, Wolff S (1987) Very low doses of X-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis 2: 95–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shadley JD, Afzal V, Wolff S (1987) Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of X-rays to human lymphocytes. Radiat Res 111: 511–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singer B (1975) The chemical effects of nucleic acid alkylation and their relation to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.Prog Nucl Acid Res Mol Biol 15: 219–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomasz M, Mercado CM, Olson J, Chatterjee N(1974) The mode of interaction of mitomycin with deoxyribonucleic acid and polynucleotides in vitro. Biochemistry 13: 4878–4887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vijayalaxmi, Burkart W (1989) Resistance and crossresistance to chromosome damage in human blood lymphocytes adapted to bleomycin. Mutat Res 211: 1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waldstein F, Cao AE, Setlow RB (1982) Adaptive resynthesis of 06-methylguanine-accepting protein can explain the difference between mammalian cells proficient and deficient in methyl excision repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 5117–5121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ward JF (1988) DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation and repairability. Prog Nucl Acid Res Mol Biol 35: 95–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiencke JK, Afzal V, Olivieri G, Wolff S (1986) Evidence that the [3H]thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of X-rays involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1: 375–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolff S, Afzal V, Wiencke JK, Olivieri G, Michaeli A (1988) Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 53: 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolff S, Wiencke JK, Afzal V, Youngblom J, Cortes F (1989) The adaptive response of human lymphocytes to very low doses of ionizing radiation: a case of induced chromosomal repair with the induction of specific proteins. In: Baverstock KF, Stather JW (eds) Low dose radiation: biological basis of risk assessment. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 446–454Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Ikushima
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Reactor InstituteKyoto UniversityKumatori-cho, Sennan-gun, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations