Advertisement

New Perspectives on the Hexactinellid Genus Dactylocalyx Stutchbury

  • H. M. Reiswig

Abstract

In spite of its important position in the early taxonomic history of the Hexactinellida, Dactylocalyx remains a poorly known genus. As Schulze (1887) pointed out, D. pumiceus was most likely the first hexactinellid referred to in 1780; when described by Stutchbury in 1841, it was the first dictyonine and the fourth recognized species of the group that eventually formed the class Hexactinellida. It served repeatedly as the basis for the Dactylocalycidae in the taxonomic schemes of Gray (1867) and Ijima (1903), although the type specimen was never depicted and its characters barely appreciated. Dactylocalyx pumiceus remains important as the largest and most common hexactinellid throughout the western tropical Atlantic. Interest in the genus was renewed with Reid’s (1957, 1962) resurrection of the Dactylocalycidae and the surprising transfer of the group to the Lychniscosa. I provide here a short review of the history of the genus, and present result of skeletal and soft-tissue investigations on recently collected specimens.

Keywords

Type Specimen Chamber Wall British Museum Philos Trans Fibrous Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowerbank JS (1858) On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae. Part 1: On the spicules. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 148:279–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowerbank JS (1862) On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae. Part III. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 152:1087–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowerbank JS (1869) A monograph of the siliceo-fibrous sponges. (Part I). Proc Zool Soc Lond 1869:66–100Google Scholar
  4. Carter H J (1873) On the Hexactinellidae and Lithistidae generally, and particularly on the Aphrocallistidae, Aulodictyon, and Farreae, together with facts elicited from their deciduous structures and descriptions respectively of three new species. Ann Mag Nat Hist (4) 12:349–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray JE (1859) Description on MacAndrewia andMyliusia, two new forms of sponges. Proc Zool Soc Lond XXVII:437–440Google Scholar
  6. Gray JE (1867) Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the description of some new genera. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1867:492–558Google Scholar
  7. Ijima I (1903) Studies on the Hexactinellida. Contribution III. (Placosoma, a new Euplectellida; Leucopsacidae and Caulophacidae). J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo 18:1–124Google Scholar
  8. Ijima I (1927) The Hexactinellida of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga Exped Reports vol 6. p 383Google Scholar
  9. Mackie GO, Singla CL (1983) Studies on hexactinellid sponges. I. Histology of Rhabdocalyptus dawsoni (Lambe 1873). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 301:365–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mothes de Moraes B (1977) Ocorrencia de Dactylocalyx pumiceus Stutchbury, 1841, no litoral do Rio Grande do Sul (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Inheringia (Zool) 50:41–50Google Scholar
  11. Reid REH (1957) Notes on hexactinellid sponges. II. Dactylocalyx Stutchbury and the family Dactylocalycidae Gray. Ann Mag Nat Hist (12) 10:821–826Google Scholar
  12. Reid REH (1962) Notes on hexactinellid sponges. IV. Nine cretaceous Lychniscosa. Ann Mag Nat Hist (13) 5:33–45Google Scholar
  13. Reiswig HM, Browman HI (1987) Use of membrane filters for microscopic preparations of sponge spicules. Trans Am Microsc Soc 106:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reiswig HM, Mackie GO (1983) Studies on hexactinellid sponges. III. The taxonomic status of Hexactinellida within the Porifera. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 301:419–428Google Scholar
  15. Schulze FE (1887) Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Rep Sci Res Challenger Zool vol 21. p 513Google Scholar
  16. Sollas WJ (1879) Observations onDactylocalyx pumiceus, with a description of a new variety, D. stutchburyi. J R Microsc Soc 2:122–133Google Scholar
  17. Stutchbury S (1841) Description of a new sponge from Barbados. Proc Zool Soc Lond 9:86–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Reiswig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations