Influence of MHC and Non-MHC Genes on Tumorigenesis and the Use of the Recombinant Congenic Strains as a Novel Tool for the Genetic Analysis of Tumor Susceptibility
One of the main developments in the contemporary biology is the rapid progress in the structural analysis of the mammalian genome, concentrated mainly on two species - the human and the mouse. A specific potential of the analysis of the mouse genome resides in the possibility of combining the structural analysis with the study of the genetic determination of various functional traits. This contribution of mouse studies is especially valuable in view of the limited possibilities of direct biological experiments in humans.
KeywordsLeukemia Adenoma Glucocorticoid Urethane Papillary Tumor
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Falconer DS (1963) Quantitative inheritance. In: Burdette WJ (ed) Methodology in Mammalian Genetics. Holden-Day, San Francisco, pp 193–216Google Scholar
- Fleiszer D, Hilgers J, Skamene E (1987) Multigenic control of colon carcinogenesis in mice treated with 1,2-dimethyl-hydrazine. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 137: 243–249Google Scholar
- Lathrop AEC, Loeb L (1913–1914) The incidence of cancer in various strains of mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 11: 34–38Google Scholar
- Lilly F, Boyse EA, Old LJ (1964) Genetic basis of susceptibility to viral leukemogenesis. Lancet ii: 1207–1209Google Scholar
- Miyashita N, Moriwaki K (1987) H-2-controlled genetic susceptibility to pulmonary adenomas induced by urethane and 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide in A/Wy congenic strains. Jpn J Cancer Res (Gann) 78: 494–498Google Scholar
- Rehm S, Ward JM, ten Have-Opbroek AAW, Anderson LM, Singh G, Katyal SL, Rice JM (1988) Mouse papillary lung tumors transplacentally induced by N-Nitrosoethylurea: Evidence for alveolar type II cell origin by comparative light microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical studies. Cancer Res 48: 148–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roderick TH, Schlager G (1966) Multiple factor inheritance. In: Green EL (ed) Biology of the Laboratory Mouse. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 151–164Google Scholar