Relations Between Perception and Action: Unity in Diversity

  • E. Scheerer


Professor Bieri has no story of his own to tell about perception and action. Nor do I. What is more, I do not even have an axe to grind. Having been raised in the information-processing approach myself, I saw nothing objectionable in its adoption by some of the contributors to this book. But now that Bieri has alerted us to its dangers and insufficiencies, I believe that a few words are in order, not in defense of the overall approach, but on some specific points raised by my co-commentator.


Motor Program Efference Copy Neural Oscillator Common Code Motor Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ach, N. (1905). Über die Willenstcitigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  2. Ach, N. (1935). Analyse des Willens. Berlin: Urban Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  3. Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brozek, J. (1979). F.C. Donders (1818–1889) and the timing of mental operations. Psychological Reports, 26, 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danto, A.C. (1965). Basic actions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 141–148Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (1976). Hierarchical organization: A candidate principle for ethology. In: P.P.G. Bateson R.A. Hinde (Eds.). Growing points in ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dennett, D.C. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dretske, F. (1988). The stance stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 511–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallistel, C.R. (1980). The organization of action: A new synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, A.R. Gardner, B.T. (1988). Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethólogical alternative to the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 429–494.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton–Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Hatfield, G. (1988). Representation and content in some (actual) theories of perception. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 19, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In: L.A. Jeffress (Ed.) Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, (pp. 112–146 ). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Lotze, R.H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  15. MacKay, D.G. (1973). Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacKay, D.G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.Google Scholar
  19. Pattee, H.H. (1977). Dynamic and linguistic modes of complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 3, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo–motor action. In: H. Heuer A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on Perception and Action, (pp. 47–76 ) Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Pylyshyn, Z.M. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reed, E.S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 98–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roitblat, H.L. (1982). The meaning of representation in animal memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 353–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheerer, E. (1984). Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In: W. Prinz A.F. Sanders (Eds.) Cognition and motor processes, (pp. 77–98 ). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheerer, E. (1988). Muscle sense and innervation feelings: A chapter in the history of perception and action. In: H. Heuer A.F. Sanders (Eds.) Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 171–194 ). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Scheerer, E. (1988). Towards a history of cognitive science, international Social Science Journal, 40 (1), 7–20.Google Scholar
  27. Von Hoisten, C., Rönnqvist, L. (1988). Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 610–621.Google Scholar
  28. Von Holst, E. (1939). Die relative Koordination als Phänomen und als Methode zentralnervöser Funktionsanalyse. Ergebnisse der Physiologie, 42, 228–306.Google Scholar
  29. Von Holst, E., Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das Reafferenzprinzip ( Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie ). Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476.Google Scholar
  30. Von Uexküll, J. (1973). Theoretische Biologie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (original woik published 1920 ).Google Scholar
  31. Von Weizsäcker, V. (1973). Der Gestaltkreis. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp (original work published 1940 ).Google Scholar
  32. Weiss, P. (1941). Self-differentiation of the basic patterns of coordination. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 77 (4). 387Google Scholar
  33. Wundt, W. (1911). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (6th ed.), Vol. 3. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Scheerer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations