Evaluation of the Severity of Ventricular Rhythm Disturbances: Value of Electrophysiological Testing and Recording of Late Potentials

  • L. Seipel
  • G. Breithardt
  • M. Borggrefe
Conference paper

Abstract

Sudden death is one of the major risks in patients suffering from coronary heart disease especially after myocardial infarction. In most instances this final event is caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Many studies have shown that ventricular premature beats are the harbingers of sudden death in these patients [1]. The prerequisite for the induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias is the arrhythmogenic electrophysiological substrate. The presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate is, however, not sufficient to develop ventricular tachycardia. Instead, some additional factors (such as ventricular premature beats) are necessary to initiate a reentrant tachycardia. Ventricular premature beats can be recorded by Holter monitoring and exercise tests. However, they have been shown to have a low predictive value for sudden death [2, 3]. The presence or absence of an arrhythmogenic substrate can be assessed by means of programmed stimulation (ventricular “vulnerability”). Of course, the fibrillation threshold cannot be measured in man. However, in experimental studies a good correlation between the fibrillation threshold and repetitive ventricular responses was found [4].

Keywords

Radionuclide Cardiomyopathy Cardiol Hunt Dial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moss AJ (1980) Clinical significance of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 23:33–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong WF, McHenry PL (1985) Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring: can we predict sudden death? J Am Coll Cardiol 5:13B–16BPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kostis JB, Byington R, Friedman LM, Goldstein S, Furberg C (1987) Prognostic significance of ventricular ectopic activity in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matta RJ, Yerrier R, Lown B (1976) The repetitive extrasystole as an index of vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation. Am J Physiol 230: 1461Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abendroth RR, Breithardt G, Biese HP, Yeh HL, Seipel L (1981) Häufigkeit, Reproduzierbarkeit und prognostische Bedeutung ventrikulärer Echoschläge bei Patienten mit und ohne koronare Herzkrankheit. Z Kardiol 70: 889–894Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breithardt G, Seipel L, Meyer T, Abendroth RR (1982) Prognostic significance of repetitive ventricular response during programmed ventricular stimulation. Am J Cardiol 49: 693–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breithardt G, Becker R, Seipel L, Abendroth RR, Ostermeyer J (1981) Non-invasive detection of late potentials in man - a new marker for ventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 2:1 –11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Haerten K, Seipel L (1986) Value of electrophysiologic testing, recording of late potentials by averaging techniques and Holter monitoring for the identification of high risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. In: Kulbertus HE (ed) Medical management of cardiac arrhythmias. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 228–245Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Karbenn U, Abendroth RR, Yeh HL, Seipel L (1982) Prevalence of late potentials in patients with and without ventricular tachycardia: correlation with angiographic findings. Am J Cardiol 49: 1932–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Quantius B, Karbenn U, Seipel L (1983) Ventricular vulnerability assessed by programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with and without late potentials. Circulation 68: 275–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breithardt G, Schwarzmaier J, Borggrefe M, Haerten K, Seipel L (1983) Prognostic significance of late ventricular potentials after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 4:487– 495Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breithardt G, Broggrefe M (1986) Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical significance of ventricular late potentials. Eur Heart J 7: 364–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denniss AR, Richards DA, Cody DV, Russell PA, Young AA, Ross DL, Uther JB (1987) Correlation between signal-averaged electrocardiogram and programmed stimulation in patients with and without spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 59:586– 590Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Leiter ER, Oeff M, Loock D, Jahns B, Schröder R (1983) Value of non-invasively detected delayed ventricular depolarization to predict prognosis in post myocardial infarction patients (abstr). Circulation 68 [Suppl III]: 831Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmermann M, Adamec R, Simonin P, Richez J (1985) Prognostic significance of ventricular late potentials in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 109: 725–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cripps T, Bennet D, Camm J, Ward D (1988) Prospective evaluation of clinical assessment, exercise testing and signal-averaged electrocardiogram in predicting outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 62: 995–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cripps T, Bennet ED, Camm AJ, Ward DE (1988) High gain signal averaged electrocardiogram combined with 24 hour monitoring in patients early after myocardial infarction for bedside prediction of arrhythmic events. Br Heart J 60: 181–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gomes JA, Winters SL, Stewart D, Horowitz S, Milner M, Barreca P (1987) A new non-invasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 349–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL (1987) Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol 9: 531–538Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borbola J, Ezri MD, Denes P (1988) Correlation between the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and electrophysiologic study findings in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Am Heart J 115: 816–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buxton AE, Simson MB, Falcone RA, Marchlinski FE, Doherty JU, Josephson ME (1987) Results of signal-averaged electrocardiography and electrophysiologic study in patients with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia after healing of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 60: 80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindsay BD, Ambos HD, Schechtman KB, Cain ME (1986) Improved selection of patients for programmed ventricular stimulation by frequency analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms. Circulation 73: 675–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nalos PC, Gang ES, Mandel WJ, Ladenheim ML, Lass Y, Peter T (1987) The signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a screening test for inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia in high risk patients: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 9: 539–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turitto G, Fontaine JM, Ursell SN, Cares EB, Henkin R, El-Sherif N (1988) Value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a predictor of the results of programmed stimulation in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 61: 1272–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winters SL, Stewart D, Gomes JA (1987) Signal averaging of the surface QRS complex predicts inducibility of ventricular tachycardia in patients with syncope of unknown origin: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 775–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhandari AK, Hong R, Kotlweski A, Mcintosh N, Au P, Sankooriskal A, Rhaimtoola S (1989) Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 61: 410–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marchlinski FE, Buxton AE, Waxman HL, Josephson ME (1983) Identifying patients at risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction. Value of the response to programmed stimulation, degree of ventricular ectopic activity and severity of left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 52: 1190–1196Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Santarelli P, Bellocci F, Lperfido F, Mazzari M, Mongiardo R, Montenero AS, Manzoli U, Denes P (1985) Ventricular arrhythmias induced by programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 55: 391–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hamer A, Vohra J, Hunt D, Sloman G (1982) Prediction of sudden death by electrophysiologic studies in high risk patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 50: 223–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Richards DA, Cody DV, Dennis AR, Russel PA, Young AA, Uther JB (1983) Ventricular electrical instability: a predictor of death after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 51 (1983) 75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Denniss RA, Richards DA, Cody DV, Russel PA, Young A A, Cooper MJ, Ross DL, Uther JB (1986) Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 74: 731–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Seipel
  • G. Breithardt
  • M. Borggrefe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations