Skip to main content

Modelling Text Coherence: Events and Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • 66 Accesses

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 227))

Abstract

Traditionally, the object to be explained by both syntax and semantics is the sentence. For the artificial languages of logic, this is simply a feature built into their definitions. But to what extent do natural languages correspond to this view? The sentences of a formal language are usually independent of each other and form, at best, sets of sentences, whereas natural language sentences form texts and are usually context dependent. The answer to our question will thus depend on the degree of similarity or difference between a text and a set of sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Bäuerle, Rainer, 1988, Ereignisse und Repräsentationen, IBM Deutschland, LILOG-Report 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald, 1967, “The logical form of action sentences”, in: N. Rescher (ed.). The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: University Press, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans, 1981a, “A theory of truth and semantic representation” in: Groenendijk, Stokhof, Janssen (eds), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematical Centre Tracts, University of Amsterdam, repr. in: Groenendijk, Stokhof, Janssen (eds), 1984, Truth. Interpretation, and Information. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans, 1981b, “Evenements, representations discursives et reference temporelle”, in: Langages 64, 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans, und Christian Rohrer, 1983, “Tense in Texts”, in: Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning. Use and Interpretation of Language, Berlin de Gruyter, 250– 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard, 1987, “Algebraic semantics of event structures”, in: Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium. ITLI, University of Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Zeno, 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bäuerle, R. (1989). Modelling Text Coherence: Events and Scenarios. In: Brauer, W., Freksa, C. (eds) Wissensbasierte Systeme. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75182-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75182-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51838-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75182-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics