The Starvation-Predation Trade-Off And Some Behavioural and Ecological Consequences

  • John M. McNamara
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 20)

Abstract

There are a variety of ways in which an animal may increase the amount of food it obtains at the expense of an increase in predation risk. I give some examples:
  1. (a)

    The most obvious way to increase the amount of food gained is to increase time spent foraging. Since foraging will typically be a more risky activity than, say resting. An increase in time spent foraging will increase the probability of being taken by a predator.

     
  2. (b)

    Some areas of food give a higher yield but are more risky (Sih, 1980,1982).

     
  3. (c)

    Decreasing the level of vigilance will increase the rate of gain but increase predation risk (Pulliam, Pyke & Caraco, 1982; Milinski & Heller, 1978).

     
  4. (d)

    A bird can decrease its probability of starvation by carrying extra fat reserves. Lima (1986) and McNamara & Houston (in press, a) consider two different mechanisms by which increasing fat reserves, and hence body mass, increases predation risk. Increasing body mass results in increased metabolic costs, especially for flight. This means that more food must be obtained to maintain body weight and hence more time must be spent foraging. Thus the bird is exposed to predators for a greater time each day (cf (a)). Increasing body mass may also decrease a bird’s manoeverability and hence increase the bird’s chances of being taken by a predator.

     

Keywords

Migration Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caraco T, Martindale S, Whittam TS (1980) An empirical demonstration of risk sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 28: 820–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Houston ÀI, Kacelnik A, McNamara JM (1982) Some learning rules for acquiring information. In: Functional Ontogeny, ed McFarland DJ. Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  3. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1986) Evaluating the selection pressure on foraging decisions. In: Relevance of models and theories in ethology, ed Campan R, Zayan R. Privat, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  4. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1987) Singing to attract a mate - a stochastic dynamic game. J Theor Biol 129: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1988aì A framework for the functional analysis of behaviour. Benav and Brain Sci 11: 117–163.Google Scholar
  6. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1988b) Fighting for food: a dynamic version of the Hawk-Dove game. Evolutionary Ecology 2: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Houston AI, McNamara JM (1989) The value of food: effects of open and closed economies. Anim Behav 37: 546–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kagel JH, Green L, Caraco T (1986) When foragers discount the future: Constraint or adaptation? Anim Behav 34: 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lack D (1954) The Regulation of Animal Numbers. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Lima SL (1986) Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology 67: 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McNamara JM (in press) The policy which maximises long term survival of an animal faced with the risks of starvation ana predation. J Appi Prob.Google Scholar
  12. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1980) The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. J Theor Biol 85: 673–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1986) The common currency for behavioural decisions. Am Nat 127: 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1987a) A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour. Acta Biotheoretica 36: 3–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1987b) Starvation and predation as factors limiting population size. Ecology 68, 1515–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McNamara JM, Houston AI (in press, a) The value of fat reserves and the trade off between starvation ana predation. Acta Biotheoretica.Google Scholar
  17. McNamara JM, Houston AI (in press, b) Starvation and predation in a patchy environment. In: Living in Patchy Environment, ed Shorrocks B, Swingland I. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. McNamara JM, Houston AI (in press, c) State dependent ideal free distributions.Google Scholar
  19. Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) Nature 275: 642–644.Google Scholar
  20. Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T (1982) The scanning behaviour of juncos: a game-theoretical approacn. J Theor Biol 95: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sih A (1980) Optimal behaviour: can foragers balance two conflicting demands ? Science 210: 1041–1043.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63: 786–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. McNamara
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations