Advertisement

Herbivory and the Evolution of Nongeniculate Coralline Algae (Rhodophyta, Corallinales) in the North Atlantic and North Pacific

  • R. S. Steneck
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 22)

Abstract

A comparison of the crustose coralline (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) floras of the Boreal eastern North Pacific (Prince William Sound, Alaska to Pt. Conception, California) and Subarctic western North Atlantic (Cape Cod, Massachusetts to the Strait of Belle Isle, Newfoundland) provides an excellent means of comparison for identifying specific adaptations to herbivory. The floras of both regions have about the same number of genera (5) and abundant species (5–7) but no species are common to both regions and a few genera are found in only one region. Only chitons, limpets and sea urchins have species known to be capable of grazing corallines in these regions. The diversity of these coralline-grazers is greater in the Pacific Northwest (13 spp. total, 8 important) compared to the North Atlantic (4 spp. total, 2 important). Only the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, is found in both regions.

Given the apparent taxonomic dissimilarity between the two regions, the anatomical and morphological characteristics found under specific herbivore regimes of grazing frequency and grazing intensity are remarkably similar. In both regions, habitats having no coralline-grazers are dominated by corallines having thin unbranched thalli (i.e., without protuberances or excrescences), and raised conceptacles. Habitats having frequent low-intensity grazing from limpets or chitons are often dominated by thicker forms occasionally having a multi-layered epithallus. In regions where the most intense grazing is from sea urchins, the coralline flora is often dominated by plants having stout protuberances (excrescences), raised conceptacles and a single layered epithallus. Manipulative experiments demonstrate the adaptive nature of these characteristics. Such anatomical and morphological similarities corresponding to the specific herbivore environment suggest that herbivory is a powerful selective force in the evolution of corallines and possibly responsible for the apparent convergent evolution of these cold-water floras.

Keywords

Grazing Intensity Crustose Coralline Alga Coralline Alga Bite Mark Herbivore Biomass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, IA, Hollenberg, GJ (1976) Marine algae of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Adey WH (1964) The genus Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia 24: 277–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adey WH (1966) The genera Lithothamnium, Leptophytum (nov. gen.) and Phymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine. Hydrobiologia 28: 321–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adey WH (1970 a) The crustose corallines of the northwestern North Atlantic including Lithothamnium lemoineae n. sp. J Phycol 6: 225–229Google Scholar
  5. Adey WH (1970 b) A revision of the Foslie crustose coralline herbarium. K Norske Vidensk Selsk Skr 1: 1–46Google Scholar
  6. Adey WH (1971) The sublittoral distribution of crustose corallines on the Norwegian coast. Sarsia 46: 41–58Google Scholar
  7. Adey WH, Adey PJ (1973) Studies on the biosystematics and ecology of the epilithic crustose Corallinaceae of the British Isles, Br Phycol J 8: 343–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Adey WH, Johansen HW (1972) Morphology and taxonomy of Corallinaceae with special reference to Clathromorphum, Mesophyllum, and Neopolyporolithon gen. nov. (Rhodophyceae, Cryptonemiales). Phycologia 11: 159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Adey WH, Macintyre IG (1973) Crustose coralline algae: a re-evaluation in the geological sciences. Geol Soc Am Bull 84: 883–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Adey WH, Townsend RA, Boykins WT (1982) The crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae) of the Hawaiian Islands. Smithson Contr Mar Sci 15: 1–74Google Scholar
  11. Buss LW (1980) Competitive intensity and size frequency distribution of interacting populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 77: 5355–5359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosner EX (1978) A field guide to the Atlantic seashore. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Grime, J P (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagen N (1983) Destructive grazing of kelp beds by sea urchins in Vestifjorden, Northern Norway. Sarsia 68: 177–190Google Scholar
  15. Johnson JH (1961) Limestone building algae and algal limestones. Johnson, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen HW (1981) Coralline algae, a first synthesis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FlGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson JH (1957) Calcareous algae. Prof Pap U S Geol Surv 280: 209–246Google Scholar
  18. Johnson J H (1962) The algal genus Lithothamnium and its fossil representatives. Colo Sch Mines 515: 1–111Google Scholar
  19. Johnson JH (1963) The algal genus Archaeolithothamnion and its fossil representatives. J Paleont 37: 175–211.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson JH (1965) The genus Lithophyllum and its fossil representatives. In Johnson JH, Adey WH Studies of Lithophyllum and related algal genera. Colo Sch Mines Q 60: 1–105Google Scholar
  21. Johnson JH, Adey WH (1965) Studies of Lithophyllum and related algal genera. Colo Sch Mines Q 60: 1–105Google Scholar
  22. Johnson JH, Ferris BJ (1948) Eocene algae from Florida. J Paleontol 22: 764–766Google Scholar
  23. Johnson JH, Kaska H V (1965) Fossil algae from Guatamala. Prof Contr Colo Sch Mines 1: 1–52Google Scholar
  24. Kozloff EF (1973) Seashore life of Puget Sound, the Strait of Georgia, and the San Juan Archipelago. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kützing FT (1841) Ueber die’Polypiers calciféres’ des Lamouroux. F. Thiele, NordhausenGoogle Scholar
  26. Lebednik PA (1977) The Corallinaceae of northwestern North America. 1. Clathromorphum Foslie emend Adey. Syesis 9: 59–112Google Scholar
  27. Lemoine MP (1913) Mélobésiées. Revision des Mélobésiées antarctiques. In: Charcot J (ed.) Deuxéme Expédition antarctique française (1908–1910) Sciences Naturelles, Vol. 1 Botanique. Masson, Paris, p 1–67, 2 plGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindberg DR (1979) Variations in the limpet, Collisella ochracea, and the northeastern Pacific distribution of Notoacmaea testudinalis (Acmaeidae). The Nautilus 93: 50–56Google Scholar
  29. Mason LR (1953) The crustaceous coralline algae of the Pacific coast of the United States, Canada and Alaska. Univ Calif Publ Bot 26: 313–390Google Scholar
  30. Morris RH, Abbott DP, Haderlie EC (1980) Intertidal invertebrates of California. Stanford Univ. Press. Stanford, CaGoogle Scholar
  31. Paine RT (1980) Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. J Anim Ecol 49: 667–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paine R T (1984) Ecological determinism in the competition for space. Ecology 65: 1339–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poignant AF (1977) The Mesozoic red algae: a general survey. In: Flügel (ed) Fossil Algae Recent Results and Developments. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson, GG (1953) The major features of evolution. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Steneck RS (1978) Factors influencing the distribution of crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae) in the Damariscotta River estuary, Maine. MS thesis. Univ. Maine, OronoGoogle Scholar
  36. Steneck RS (1982a) A limpet-coralline alga association: adaptations and defenses between a selective herbivore and its prey. Ecology 63: 507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steneck RS (1982b) Adaptive trends in the ecology and evolution of crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae). Ph. D. Dissertation. Johns Hopkins Univ., BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  38. Steneck, RS (1983) Escalating herbivory and resulting adaptive trends in calcareous algal crusts. Paleobiology 9: 44–61Google Scholar
  39. Steneck RS (1985) Adaptations of crustose coralline algae to herbivory: patterns in space and time. In: Toomey DF, Nitecki MH (eds.) Paleoalgology. Springer-Verlag, p 352–366Google Scholar
  40. Steneck RS (1986) The ecology of coralline algal crusts: convergent patterns and adaptive strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17: 273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steneck RS, Paine RT (1986) Ecological and taxonomic studies of shallow-water encrusting Corallinaceae (Rhodophyta) of the boreal northeastern PacificGoogle Scholar
  42. Steneck RS, Watling L (1982) Feeding capabilities and limitations of herbivorous molluscs: a function group approach. Mar Biol 68: 299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woelkerling WJ (1985) A taxonomic reassessment of Spongites (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) based on studies of Kützing’s original collection. Phycologia 20: 125–153Google Scholar
  44. Woelkerling WJ (1988) The coralline red algae: an analysis of the genera and subfamilies of nongeniculate Corallinaceae. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Wray JL (1977) Calcareous Algae. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Steneck
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Darling Marine CenterUniversity of MaineWalpoleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Oceanography, Darling Marine CenterUniversity of MaineWalpoleUSA

Personalised recommendations