Concluding Remarks: Dispersal and Gene Flow
I wish to restrict my comments largely to one general area of the points which have been discussed during the conference, namely the extent to which birds can evolve different characteristics in different habitats. This problem has several inter-connected aspects concerning the rate of possible gene-flow between such habitats, the quality of individual birds and the associated problems of dispersal.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1974) On clutch-size and fitness. Ibis 116: 217–219Google Scholar
- Dhondt AA, Olaerts G (1981) Variations in survival and dispersal with ringing date as shown by recoveries of Belgian Great Tits, Parus major. Ibis 123: 96–98Google Scholar
- Garnett MC (1981) Body size, its heritability and influence on juvenile survival among Great Tits, Parus major. Ibis 123: 31–41Google Scholar
- Gosier AG (1990) On the use of greater covert moult and pectoral muscle as measures of condition in passerines with data for the Great Tit Parus major. Bird Study 37: in pressGoogle Scholar
- Kluyver HN (1951) The population ecology of the Great Tit, Parus m. major L. Ardea 39: 1–135Google Scholar
- Kluyver HN (1971) Regulation of numbers in populations of the Great Tit (Parus m. major). Proc Adv Study Inst Dynamics Numbers Popul (Oosterbeek 1970): 507–523Google Scholar
- McCleery RH, Perrins CM (1989) Great Tit. In Newton I (ed) Lifetime Reproduction in Birds. Academic Press, p 35–53Google Scholar
- Noordwijk AJ van, Balen JH van, Scharloo W (1980) Heritability of Ecologically important Traits in the Great Tit. Ardea 68: 193–203Google Scholar