Brood Defence in Great Tit (Parus Major) Pairs and the Concorde Fallacy

  • Wolfgang Windt
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 24)

Abstract

Theory predicts that an animal’s decision of how much to invest into an ongoing project should depend only on future benefits and not on past costs (Dawkins and Carlisle 1976, Boucher 1977). A Gosleriolation of this rule has become known as the Concorde fallacy. But past costs and future benefits are often closely correlated. This difficulty may be circumvented by uncoupling both, i.e. manipulating future benefits and leaving costs unchanged or vice versa (Robertson and Biermann 1979, Weatherhead 1982, Curio 1983, Carlisle 1985, Windt and Curio 1986).

Keywords

Cage Nylon Defend Vica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlisle TR (1985) Parental response to brood size in a cichlid fish. Animal behaviour 33: 234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Curio E (1983) Begehen Kohlmeisen den “Concorde-Fehler”? Journal für Ornithologie 124: 196–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curio E (1987) Brood defence in the Great Tit: The influence of age, number and quality of young. Ardea 75: 35–42Google Scholar
  4. Curio E, Regelmann K (1982) Fortpflanzungswert und “Brutwert” der Kohlmeise (Parus major). Journal für Ornithologie 123: 237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262: 131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1988) Effects of flight costs on the optimal diet: an experiment with pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca feeding nestlings. Omis Scandinavica 19: 111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindén M (1987) Clutch size and fitness in Great tits. Abstract ESEB Foundation Congress BaselGoogle Scholar
  8. Murphy MT (1983) Clutch size in the eastern king bird: factors affecting nestling survival. The Auk 100: 326–334Google Scholar
  9. Nur N (1984) The consequences of brood size for breeding Blue Tits II: nestling weight, offspring survival and optimal brood size. Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 497–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perrins CM (1979) British Tits. Collins, London, 213–214Google Scholar
  11. Pettifor RA, Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1988) Individual optimization of clutch size in great tits. Nature 336: 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Regelmann K, Curio E (1983) Determinants of brood defence in the Great Tit Parus major L. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robertson RJ, Biermann GC (1979) Parental investment strategies determined by expected benefits. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 50: 124–128Google Scholar
  14. Smith HG, Källander H, Nilsson JÅ (1988) The trade-off between offspring number and quality in great tits Parus major. In: Smith HG Reproductive costs and offspring quality: the evolution of clutch size in tits (Parus). Dissertation Lund University, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  15. Weatherhead PJ (1982) Risk taking by red-winged blackbirds and the concordefallacy. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 60: 199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Westmoreland D, Best LB (1987) What limits mourning doves to a clutch of two eggs. Condor 89: 486–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Windt W, Curio E (1986) Clutch defence in the Great Tit (Parus major) pairs and the Concorde Fallacy. Ethology 72: 236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Windt
    • 1
  1. 1.Arbeitsgruppe für VerhaltensforschungRuhr-Universität BochumBochum 1West Germany

Personalised recommendations