King David’s conquest of Jerusalem seems to have been an extraordinary deed. The Jebusite citadel survived conquest by the Israelites. Although the Amorite King of Jerusalem, heading a coalition of Amorite kings, was defeated in the field, the City of Jerusalem was not conquered. It defied even King Saul, whose main city was in Gibeah, about five kilometers to the north. One of the reasons that the Jebusites could withstand the assaults of the Israelite warriors was the topographical set up of their city. It was built on a hill surrounded by steep gorges on three sides. The fourth side was probably defended by a wall and a trench. Another reason might have been the water supply which enabled the city to withstand siege. One deep shaft was excavated from within the city walls to reach the water table of the spring of Gihon (“the emerging one”).
KeywordsFlare Cretaceous Silt Charcoal Gravel
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References Chapter 11
- 1.Aharoni, Y., The Archeology of the Land of Israel. Westminster, Philadelfia (1982) 344 pp.Google Scholar
- 2.Simmons, J. J., Jerusalem in the Old Testament by J.E. Brill. Leiden (1952) 517 pp.Google Scholar
- 3.Sasson, J., The Niqba inscription. Pal. Exp. J. (1982) 114: 111–117.Google Scholar
- 4.Amiran, R., The Water Supply of Jerusalem. In: Jerusalem Revealed. Shikmona, Jerusalem (1975) 134 pp.Google Scholar
- 5.Issar, A., The Evolution of the Ancient Water Supply System in the Region of Jerusalem. Isr. Expl. Jou. (1976) 26, 2–3: 130–131.Google Scholar
- 6.Sandstrom, G.E., Man the Builder. McGraw-Hill Books (1970) 280 pp.Google Scholar
- 7.Pritchard, J.B., Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Princeton (1955) 380 pp.Google Scholar
- 8.Arberry, A.J. (ed.), The Legacy of Persia. Oxford Press (1953) 419 pp.Google Scholar
- 9.Finegan, J., The Archaeology of World Religions. Princeton University Press (1952) I: 599 pp.Google Scholar
- 10.Doblhofer, E., Voices in Stone. Collier Books, New York (1961) 326 pp.Google Scholar