Marker Variables for Early Identification of Physically Awkward Children
The Motor Development Clinic at the University of Alberta is in its 8th year of operation. It was designed as a clinical intervention programme for physically awkward children who have difficulty coping in group learning and performance settings in the school and community. The children are referred to the clinic by various professionals including paediatricians, psychologists, social workers, special educators and classroom teachers. A comprehensive assessment and interview process ensues before clinic attendance is recommended. Results of this assessment and interview are recorded in a detailed report which is sent to the parents and the referral agency. The children then take part in a twice weekly after-school programme of free play, fitness activities, individualised instruction and group games. At the conclusion of the programme, the staff meet with the parents and the child to discuss progress made in the clinic and to make recommendations for involvement in suitable community-based programmes. The conclusions drawn from this leisure counselling session are detailed in a second written report to the parents.
KeywordsMarker Variable Implicit Theory Late Talking Developmental Review Reading Disable Child
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cadman D, Walter S, Chambers L, Ferguson R, Szatmari P, Johnson N, McNamee J (1988) Predicting problems in school performance from preschool health, developmental and behavioural assessments. Can Med Assoc J 139:31–36Google Scholar
- Engelman L, Hartigan JA (1975) PKM K-means clusteringGoogle Scholar
- Fry P (1984) Changing conceptions of intelligence and intellectual functioning: current theory and research. In: Fry P (ed) Changing conceptions of intelligence and intellectual functioning: current theory and research. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Howell J (1989) Developmental review. Developmental Review Conference: Somewhere between screening and assessment. EdmontonGoogle Scholar
- Ireton H (1988) Developmental review. In: Lichtenstein R, Ireton H (eds) Preschool screening: identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- Keogh J, Sugden D, Reynard C, Calkins J (1979) Identification of clumsy children: comparisons and comments. J Hum Movement Stud 5:32–41Google Scholar
- McBogg J (1989) Principles and practicality of developmental review programs. Developmental Review Conference: somewhere between screening and assessment, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
- Sternberg R (1986) Implicit theories: an alternative to modeling cognition and its development. In: Bizanz J, Brainerd CJ, Kail R (eds) Formal methods in developmental psychology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Taylor MJ (1984 a) Assessing physical awkwardness: a learning disability. In: Brown A, Brickell D, Groves L, McLeish E, Morris P, Sugden D (eds) Adapted physical activities. Lee, Bishop’s Stortford, pp 43–58Google Scholar
- Taylor MJ (1984 b) A motor development approach to physical awkwardness. Association for Children and Adults with Learning Disabilities, YellowknifeGoogle Scholar
- Wall AE (1982) Physically awkward children: a motor development perspective. In: Das JP, Mulcahy R, Wall AE (eds) Theory and research in learning disabilities. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wall AE, McClements J, Bouffard M, Findlay H, Taylor MJ (1985) A knowledge-based approach to motor development: implications for the physically awkward. Adapt Phys ActivQ (2)1:21–42Google Scholar